Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jan 4;79(1):18-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.10.031.
Transcatheter pulmonary valve (TPV) replacement (TPVR) has become the standard therapy for postoperative pulmonary outflow tract dysfunction in patients with a prosthetic conduit/valve, but there is limited information about risk factors for death or reintervention after this procedure.
This study sought to evaluate mid- and long-term outcomes after TPVR in a large multicenter cohort.
International registry focused on time-related outcomes after TPVR.
Investigators submitted data for 2,476 patients who underwent TPVR and were followed up for 8,475 patient-years. A total of 95 patients died after TPVR, most commonly from heart failure (n = 24). The cumulative incidence of death was 8.9% (95% CI: 6.9%-11.5%) 8 years after TPVR. On multivariable analysis, age at TPVR (HR: 1.04 per year; 95% CI: 1.03-1.06 per year; P < 0.001), a prosthetic valve in other positions (HR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.2-3.7; P = 0.014), and an existing transvenous pacemaker/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (HR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.3-3.4; P = 0.004) were associated with death. A total of 258 patients underwent TPV reintervention. At 8 years, the cumulative incidence of any TPV reintervention was 25.1% (95% CI: 21.8%-28.5%) and of surgical TPV reintervention was 14.4% (95% CI: 11.9%-17.2%). Risk factors for surgical reintervention included age (0.95 per year [95% CI: 0.93-0.97 per year]; P < 0.001), prior endocarditis (2.5 [95% CI: 1.4-4.3]; P = 0.001), TPVR into a stented bioprosthetic valve (1.7 [95% CI: 1.2-2.5]; P = 0.007), and postimplant gradient (1.4 per 10 mm Hg [95% CI: 1.2-1.7 per 10 mm Hg]: P < 0.001).
These findings support the conclusion that survival and freedom from reintervention or surgery after TPVR are generally comparable to outcomes of surgical conduit/valve replacement across a wide age range.
经导管肺动脉瓣(TPV)置换术(TPVR)已成为人造管道/瓣膜术后肺动脉流出道功能障碍的标准治疗方法,但关于该手术后死亡或再次介入的风险因素的信息有限。
本研究旨在评估大型多中心队列中 TPVR 后的中期和长期结果。
专注于 TPVR 后时间相关结果的国际注册处。
研究人员提交了 2476 名接受 TPVR 并随访 8475 患者年的患者的数据。TPVR 后共有 95 例患者死亡,最常见的死因是心力衰竭(n=24)。TPVR 后 8 年的死亡率累计发生率为 8.9%(95%CI:6.9%-11.5%)。多变量分析显示,TPVR 时的年龄(每增加 1 岁,风险比[HR]为 1.04;95%CI:1.03-1.06;P<0.001)、其他部位的人造瓣膜(HR:2.1;95%CI:1.2-3.7;P=0.014)和现有的经静脉起搏器/植入式心律转复除颤器(HR:2.1;95%CI:1.3-3.4;P=0.004)与死亡相关。共有 258 名患者接受了 TPV 再次介入治疗。8 年后,任何 TPV 再次介入的累积发生率为 25.1%(95%CI:21.8%-28.5%),手术 TPV 再次介入的累积发生率为 14.4%(95%CI:11.9%-17.2%)。手术再介入的危险因素包括年龄(每年增加 0.95[95%CI:0.93-0.97 年];P<0.001)、既往心内膜炎(2.5[95%CI:1.4-4.3];P=0.001)、TPVR 进入带支架的生物瓣(1.7[95%CI:1.2-2.5];P=0.007)和植入后梯度(每增加 10mmHg 1.4[95%CI:1.2-1.7 每 10mmHg]:P<0.001)。
这些发现支持这样的结论,即在广泛的年龄范围内,TPVR 后的生存率和免于再次介入或手术的生存率与外科管道/瓣膜置换术的结果相当。