Jeong Seongkyun, Kim Tae Hee
Department of Human Intelligence Robot Engineering, Sangmyung University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Jan;12(1):95-105. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-355.
To investigate the imaging findings and visibility of breast invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and compare quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) metrics of ILC and invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST) using a histogram analysis.
We performed an observational retrospective study of 629 consecutive women with pathologically proven ILC and invasive ductal carcinoma of NST, who underwent 3-T MRI including DWI, between January 2017 and August 2020.
After propensity score matching, 71 women were allocated to each group. On DWI, 9 (12.7%) lesions of ILC and 4 (5.6%) invasive carcinomas of the NST were not visualized. For the tumor visibility on DWI, tumor size, tumor ADC value, and background diffusion grade were significantly associated with the visibility score in both groups (all P<0.05), whereas the mean background ADC value was not significant (P>0.05). The mean ADC (1.226×10 1.052×10 mm/s, P<0.001), median ADC (1.222×10 1.051×10 mm/s, P=0.002), maximum ADC (1.758×10 1.504×10 mm/s, P<0.001), minimum ADC (0.717×10 0.649×10 mm/s, P=0.003), 90th percentile ADC (1.506×10 1.292×10 mm/s, P<0.001) and 10th percentile ADC (0.956×10 0.818×10 mm/s, P=0.008) were higher in ILC than in invasive carcinoma of NST. Additionally, the ADC difference value of the ILC was higher than that of invasive carcinoma of NST (1.04×10 0.855×10 mm/s, P=0.027).
On DWI, the visibility of ILC was lower compared to invasive carcinoma of NST. ILC showed higher quantitative ADC values and higher ADC difference values.
探讨乳腺浸润性小叶癌(ILC)在扩散加权成像(DWI)上的影像学表现及可视性,并使用直方图分析比较ILC与非特殊类型浸润性癌(NST)的定量表观扩散系数(ADC)指标。
我们对2017年1月至2020年8月期间连续629例经病理证实为ILC和NST浸润性导管癌且接受了包括DWI在内的3-T磁共振成像(MRI)检查的女性进行了一项观察性回顾性研究。
在倾向得分匹配后,每组分配71名女性。在DWI上,ILC的9个(12.7%)病灶和NST的4个(5.6%)浸润性癌未显示。对于DWI上的肿瘤可视性,两组的肿瘤大小、肿瘤ADC值和背景扩散等级均与可视性评分显著相关(均P<0.05),而平均背景ADC值无显著相关性(P>0.05)。ILC的平均ADC(1.226×10⁻³mm²/s比1.052×10⁻³mm²/s,P<0.001)、中位数ADC(1.222×10⁻³mm²/s比1.051×10⁻³mm²/s,P = 0.002)、最大ADC(1.758×10⁻³mm²/s比1.504×10⁻³mm²/s,P<0.001)、最小ADC(0.717×10⁻³mm²/s比0.649×10⁻³mm²/s,P = 0.003)、第90百分位数ADC(1.506×10⁻³mm²/s比1.292×10⁻³mm²/s,P<0.001)和第10百分位数ADC(0.956×10⁻³mm²/s比0.818×10⁻³mm²/s,P = 0.008)均高于NST浸润性癌。此外,ILC 的ADC差值高于NST浸润性癌(1.04×10⁻³mm²/s比0.855×10⁻³mm²/s,P = 0.027)。
在DWI上,ILC的可视性低于NST浸润性癌。ILC显示出更高的定量ADC值和更高的ADC差值。