Department of Family and Community Medicine, Center for Excellence In Primary Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Aug;37(11):2703-2710. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07283-6. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
Racial/ethnic disparities in anticoagulation management are well established. Differences in warfarin monitoring can contribute to these disparities and should be measured.
We assessed for differences in international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring by race/ethnicity and language preference across safety-net care systems serving predominantly low-income, ethnically diverse populations.
Cross-sectional analysis of process and safety data shared from the Safety Promotion Action Research and Knowledge Network (SPARK-Net) initiative, a consortium of five California safety-net hospital systems.
Eligible patients were at least 18 years old, received warfarin for at least 56 days during the measurement period from July 2015 to June 2017, and had INR testing in an ambulatory care setting at a participating healthcare system.
We conducted a scaled Poisson regression for adjusted rate ratio of having at least one INR checked per 56-day time period for which a patient had a warfarin prescription. Adjusting for age, sex, healthcare system, and insurance status/type, we assessed for racial/ethnic and language disparities in INR monitoring.
Of 8129 patients, 3615 (44%) were female; 1470 (18%), Black/African American; 3354 (41%), Hispanic/Latinx; 1210 (15%), Asian; 1643 (20%), White; and 452 (6%), other. Three thousand five hundred forty-nine (45%) were non-English preferring. We did not observe statistically significant disparities in the rate of appropriate INR monitoring by race/ethnicity or language; the primary source of variation was by healthcare network. Older age, female gender, and uninsured patients had a slightly higher rate of appropriate INR monitoring, but differences were not clinically significant.
We did not find a race/ethnicity nor language disparity in INR monitoring; safety-net site was the main source of variation.
种族/民族在抗凝治疗管理方面存在差异,这是有据可查的。华法林监测方面的差异可能导致这些差异,并应进行测量。
我们评估了在为主要为低收入、种族多样化人群提供服务的保障网医疗系统中,种族/民族和语言偏好对国际标准化比值(INR)监测的差异。
对来自安全促进行动研究和知识网络(SPARK-Net)计划的过程和安全数据进行横断面分析,该计划是由五个加利福尼亚保障网医院系统组成的联盟。
符合条件的患者年龄至少 18 岁,在 2015 年 7 月至 2017 年 6 月的测量期间至少接受了 56 天的华法林治疗,并且在参与医疗保健系统的门诊环境中进行了 INR 检测。
我们对每个至少有一次 INR 检查的患者每 56 天时间间隔进行了比例泊松回归,以调整有华法林处方的患者的 INR 监测率比值比。在调整年龄、性别、医疗保健系统和保险状况/类型后,我们评估了 INR 监测的种族/民族和语言差异。
在 8129 名患者中,3615 名(44%)为女性;1470 名(18%)为非裔美国人;3354 名(41%)为西班牙裔/拉丁裔;1210 名(15%)为亚裔;1643 名(20%)为白人;452 名(6%)为其他种族。3549 名(45%)为非英语首选语言。我们没有观察到种族/民族或语言在 INR 监测方面存在统计学上显著的差异;主要的变异来源是医疗保健网络。年龄较大、女性和无保险的患者有稍高的适当 INR 监测率,但差异无临床意义。
我们没有发现 INR 监测方面的种族/民族或语言差异;保障网地点是变异的主要来源。