Suppr超能文献

单中心比较研究:经腹开放式与腹腔镜经肛门直肠系膜全切除的回肠贮袋肛管吻合术。是否提高了标准?

A Single-Center Comparative Study of Open Transabdominal and Laparoscopic Transanal Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis with Total Mesorectal Excision. Has the Bar Been Raised?

机构信息

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 May;26(5):1070-1076. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05236-2. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most ulcerative colitis (UC) patients requiring surgery undergo transabdominal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) performed minimally invasively or open. Although one multicenter study demonstrated acceptably low morbidity after transanal pouch, our initial single-center experience with transanal IPAA (ta-IPAA) was associated with an unacceptably high rate of anastomotic leak. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of ta-IPAA and transabdominal IPAA with growing experience of transanal proctectomy and determine whether one approach offered any advantage or benefit over the other.

METHODS

Single-center series of consecutive ulcerative colitis patients underwent 3-stage IPAA, either ta-IPAA or transabdominal IPAA at a tertiary referral center. The primary outcome measure was overall complications until immediately prior to stoma closure. Secondary outcomes included postoperative clinical measures.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of 113 patients, which included 37 (33%) patients undergoing transabdominal or open IPAA and 76 (67%) patients undergoing ta-IPAA. The overall complication rate was numerically higher in the ta-IPAA group (56%) compared to the transabdominal group (38%) (p = 0.07) as was the incidence of anastomotic leak in the ta-IPAA group (12 vs. 5%) (p = 0.17). Mean length of hospital stay was significantly higher in the transanal IPAA group (p = 0.04). Operating time, opioid use and pain scores were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Transanal IPAA has a higher incidence of overall complications and anastomotic leak compared to transabdominal IPAA. Postoperative length of stay is significantly higher in patients undergoing ta-IPAA. Operating room time, opiate use and pain scores are comparable between the two surgical approaches. Transanal IPAA appears to offer little advantage over transabdominal IPAA.

摘要

背景

大多数需要手术的溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者接受微创或开放性经腹回肠袋肛管吻合术(IPAA)。尽管一项多中心研究表明经肛门袋后发病率可接受较低,但我们最初的单中心经肛门 IPAA(ta-IPAA)经验与不可接受的高吻合口漏率相关。本研究旨在比较 ta-IPAA 和经腹 IPAA 的短期结果,同时随着经肛门直肠切除术经验的增加,并确定一种方法是否比另一种方法具有任何优势或益处。

方法

在三级转诊中心,连续的溃疡性结肠炎患者接受了 3 期 IPAA,采用 ta-IPAA 或经腹 IPAA。主要观察指标是在造口关闭前立即发生的总体并发症。次要结局包括术后临床指标。

结果

研究组包括 113 例患者,其中 37 例(33%)患者行经腹或开放性 IPAA,76 例(67%)患者行 ta-IPAA。ta-IPAA 组的总体并发症发生率(56%)明显高于经腹组(38%)(p=0.07),ta-IPAA 组吻合口漏的发生率(12 比 5%)(p=0.17)也较高。经肛门 IPAA 组的平均住院时间明显较长(p=0.04)。手术时间、阿片类药物使用和疼痛评分在两组之间相似。

结论

与经腹 IPAA 相比,经肛门 IPAA 的总体并发症和吻合口漏发生率较高。行 ta-IPAA 的患者术后住院时间明显较长。两种手术方法的手术时间、阿片类药物使用和疼痛评分相当。经肛门 IPAA 似乎没有比经腹 IPAA 有明显优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验