Hanaoka Marie, Kinugasa Yusuke, Yao Kenta, Takaoka Ayumi, Sasaki Megumi, Yamauchi Shinichi, Tokunaga Masanori
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Tokyo Medical and Dental University Bunkyo-ku Tokyo Japan.
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024 Jul 14;8(6):1056-1066. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12844. eCollection 2024 Nov.
Despite being reported safety, the advantages of transanal minimally invasive proctocolectomy (TAMIP) are controversial, and comparative studies on postoperative defecation function between ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) using laparoscopic transanal manipulation (TAMIP-IPAA) and without this technique (traditional IPAA) are lacking. This study analyzed TAMIP's impact on short-term and postoperative defecation function in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) to evaluate its safety and feasibility.
Inclusion criteria comprised patients with UC undergoing minimally invasive proctocolectomy at our hospital from May 2014 to May 2023. The TAMIP-IPAA approach involved precise rectal mucosa removal while preserving the sphincter muscle during laparoscopic transanal manipulation.
In the evaluation of short-term outcomes for 71 patients undergoing proctocolectomy, the TAMIP group (37 patients) outperformed the non-TAMIP group in operative time (395 vs. 289 min, < 0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (12 vs. 8 days, < 0.001). Additionally, TAMIP-IPAA demonstrated advantages over traditional IPAA (seven patients), in operative time (443 vs. 289 min, = 0.006), intraoperative blood loss (392 vs. 130 mL, = 0.001), postoperative hospital stay (18 vs. 8 days, = 0.003), anastomotic leakage (42.9% vs. 8.1%, = 0.041), and re-admission within 30 days (57.1% vs. 8.1%, = 0.009). Wexner scores were significantly superior in the TAMIP-IPAA group at 6 months (14.5 vs. 8.0 points, = 0.029) and 1 year post stoma closure (14.0 vs. 7.0 points, = 0.020), indicating enhanced short-term outcomes and defecation function compared to traditional IPAA.
TAMIP-IPAA for UC has the potential to offer promising benefits, including the enhancement of short-term outcomes and the improvement of defecation function.
尽管经肛门微创全直肠系膜切除术(TAMIP)已被报道具有安全性,但其优势仍存在争议,且缺乏关于使用腹腔镜经肛门操作的回肠储袋肛管吻合术(TAMIP-IPAA)与未使用该技术的(传统IPAA)术后排便功能的比较研究。本研究分析了TAMIP对溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者短期及术后排便功能的影响,以评估其安全性和可行性。
纳入标准为2014年5月至2023年5月在我院接受微创全直肠系膜切除术的UC患者。TAMIP-IPAA方法包括在腹腔镜经肛门操作过程中精确切除直肠黏膜,同时保留括约肌。
在对71例行全直肠系膜切除术患者的短期结局评估中,TAMIP组(37例患者)在手术时间(395 vs. 289分钟,<0.001)和术后住院时间(12 vs. 8天,<0.001)方面优于非TAMIP组。此外,TAMIP-IPAA在手术时间(443 vs. 289分钟,=0.006)、术中出血量(392 vs. 130毫升,=0.001)、术后住院时间(18 vs. 8天,=0.003)以及吻合口漏发生率(42.9% vs. 8.1%,=0.041)和30天内再次入院率(57.1% vs. 8.1%,=0.009)方面均优于传统IPAA(7例患者)。在术后6个月(14.5 vs. 8.0分,=0.029)和造口关闭后1年(14.0 vs. 7.0分,=0.020)时,TAMIP-IPAA组的Wexner评分显著优于传统IPAA组,表明与传统IPAA相比,TAMIP-IPAA的短期结局和排便功能得到了改善。
UC患者采用TAMIP-IPAA可能具有显著益处,包括改善短期结局和排便功能。