• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于测量学术医疗中心查房过程中以患者为中心行为的观察工具。

Observation tool to measure patient-centered behaviors on rounds in an academic medical center.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Data Management Core, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2024115. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.2024115.

DOI:10.1080/10872981.2021.2024115
PMID:34994682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8745350/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

As part of a quality improvement project, we developed and employed an observation checklist to measure patient-centered behaviors during daily rounds to assess the frequency of patient-centered behaviors among a patient-centered care (PCC) team and standard team (ST) rounds.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

On four general medicine service (GMS) teaching teams at an urban academic medical center in which housestaff rotate, we utilized an observation checklist to assess the occurrence of eight behaviors on inpatient daily rounds. The checklist covered domains of patient-centered communication, etiquette-based behaviors, and shared decision-making. One GMS team is guided by a PCC curriculum that emphasizes patient-centered communication strategies, but not specifically behaviors during bedside rounds.

RESULTS

Between August 2018 and May 2019 a trained observer completed 448 observations of patient rounding encounters using the checklist. Across all teams, 46.0% of the 8 behaviors were performed when possible, with more done on the PCC team (58.0%) than ST (42.0%), p < 0.01.

CONCLUSIONS

Performance of patient-centered behaviors during daily rounds was low overall. Despite having no specific instruction on daily rounds, patient-centered behaviors were more frequent among the teams which were part of a PCC curriculum. However, the frequency of observed behaviors was modest, suggesting that more explicit efforts to change rounding behaviors are needed. Our observational checklist may be a tool to assist in future interventions to improve patient-centered behaviors on daily rounds.

摘要

目的

作为一项质量改进项目的一部分,我们开发并使用了观察检查表来衡量日常查房中的以患者为中心的行为,以评估以患者为中心的护理 (PCC) 团队和标准团队 (ST) 查房中以患者为中心的行为的频率。

患者和方法

在城市学术医疗中心的四个普通内科服务 (GMS) 教学团队中,我们利用观察检查表评估住院患者日常查房中的八项行为发生情况。检查表涵盖以患者为中心的沟通、基于礼仪的行为和共同决策领域。一个 GMS 团队遵循 PCC 课程,该课程强调以患者为中心的沟通策略,但不特别强调床边查房时的行为。

结果

在 2018 年 8 月至 2019 年 5 月期间,一名经过培训的观察员使用检查表完成了 448 次患者查房观察。在所有团队中,有 46.0%的 8 种行为是在可能的情况下完成的,PCC 团队(58.0%)比 ST 团队(42.0%)更多,p < 0.01。

结论

总体而言,日常查房中以患者为中心的行为表现较低。尽管没有关于日常查房的具体指导,但作为 PCC 课程一部分的团队中,以患者为中心的行为更为频繁。然而,观察到的行为频率适中,这表明需要更明确地努力改变查房行为。我们的观察检查表可能是一种辅助未来干预措施的工具,以改善日常查房中的以患者为中心的行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1b0/8745350/de1cf52d93e0/ZMEO_A_2024115_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1b0/8745350/de1cf52d93e0/ZMEO_A_2024115_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1b0/8745350/de1cf52d93e0/ZMEO_A_2024115_F0001_B.jpg

相似文献

1
Observation tool to measure patient-centered behaviors on rounds in an academic medical center.用于测量学术医疗中心查房过程中以患者为中心行为的观察工具。
Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2024115. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.2024115.
2
Patient-Centered Structured Interdisciplinary Bedside Rounds in the Medical ICU.医学重症监护病房中以患者为中心的结构化跨学科床边查房
Crit Care Med. 2018 Jan;46(1):85-92. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002807.
3
Shared Decision-Making During Inpatient Rounds: Opportunities for Improvement in Patient Engagement and Communication.住院查房期间的共同决策:提高患者参与度和沟通效果的机会。
J Hosp Med. 2018 Jul 1;13(7):453-461. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2909. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
4
Patient-centered interprofessional collaborative care: factors associated with bedside interprofessional rounds.以患者为中心的跨专业协作护理:与床边跨专业查房相关的因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jul;29(7):1040-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2817-x. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
5
All Together Now: Impact of a Regionalization and Bedside Rounding Initiative on the Efficiency and Inclusiveness of Clinical Rounds.现在齐心协力:区域化和床边查房倡议对临床查房效率和包容性的影响。
J Hosp Med. 2017 Mar;12(3):150-156. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2696.
6
The art of bedside rounds: a multi-center qualitative study of strategies used by experienced bedside teachers.床边查房的艺术:一项多中心定性研究,探讨经验丰富的床边教师所使用的策略。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Mar;28(3):412-20. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2259-2. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
7
Patient- and Family-centered Rounding: A Single-site Look into the Room.以患者和家庭为中心的查房:对病房的单中心观察
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2021 Jun 23;6(4):e421. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000421. eCollection 2021 Jul-Aug.
8
The recent evolution of patient care rounds in pediatric teaching hospitals in the United States and Canada.美国和加拿大儿科教学医院患者护理查房的近期演变。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2021 Oct;49(sup1):431-436. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2021.1977561. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
9
Patient-Centered Bedside Rounds and the Clinical Examination.以患者为中心的床边查房与临床检查。
Med Clin North Am. 2018 May;102(3):509-519. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2017.12.012.
10
Patient Satisfaction with Bedside Teaching Rounds Compared with Nonbedside Rounds.与非床边查房相比,患者对床边教学查房的满意度。
South Med J. 2016 Feb;109(2):112-5. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000419.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of a nurse-led online video intervention for mealtime assistance in dementia care: a quasi-experimental mixed-methods study.护士主导的在线视频干预对痴呆症护理中进餐协助的可行性:一项准实验性混合方法研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Sep 2;25(1):677. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06315-8.
2
Optimized communication during risk disclosure to reduce nocebo headache after lumbar puncture-a study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial.腰椎穿刺后风险告知过程中优化沟通以减少反安慰剂性头痛——一项随机对照临床试验的研究方案
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 26;16:1521978. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1521978. eCollection 2025.
3
Impact of two different patient decision aids in prosthodontic consultations: a prospective randomized controlled study.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects on Physician Practice After Exposure to a Patient-Centered Care Curriculum During Residency.住院医师阶段接受以患者为中心的护理课程培训后对医生执业的影响。
J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Dec;12(6):705-709. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00067.1. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
2
Patient Perceptions and Real-Time Observations of Bedside Rounding Team Communication: The Interprofessional Teamwork Innovation Model (ITIM).患者对床边查房团队沟通的感知和实时观察: 多专业团队协作创新模型(ITIM)。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 Jul;46(7):400-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 May 17.
3
Practices to Foster Physician Presence and Connection With Patients in the Clinical Encounter.
两种不同患者决策辅助工具在修复咨询中的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Dec;27(12):7841-7849. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05375-7. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
促进临床医患互动中医生在场和联系的实践。
JAMA. 2020 Jan 7;323(1):70-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.19003.
4
Feasibility and perception of a question prompt list in outpatient cancer care.门诊癌症护理中问题提示清单的可行性及认知情况
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Aug 15;3(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0145-y.
5
Optimizing Hospitalist-Patient Communication: An Observation Study of Medical Encounter Quality.优化住院医师与患者的沟通:一项关于医疗会诊质量的观察性研究
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Apr;44(4):196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.08.011.
6
Patient participation in inpatient ward rounds on acute inpatient medical wards: a descriptive study.患者参与急性住院内科病房的住院查房:一项描述性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Jan;28(1):15-23. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007292. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
7
Shared decision-making and outcomes in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.2 型糖尿病的共同决策和结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Dec;100(12):2159-2171. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.030. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
8
Patient empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness in hospital care: A concept analysis based on a literature review.医院护理中的患者赋权、患者参与和以患者为中心:基于文献综述的概念分析
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Dec;99(12):1923-1939. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.026. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
9
Sitting at patients' bedsides may improve patients' perceptions of physician communication skills.坐在患者床边可能会提高患者对医生沟通技巧的认知。
J Hosp Med. 2016 Dec;11(12):865-868. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2634. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
10
Improving patient satisfaction through physician education, feedback, and incentives.通过医生教育、反馈和激励措施提高患者满意度。
J Hosp Med. 2015 Aug;10(8):497-502. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2373. Epub 2015 May 27.