• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

克罗地亚:卫生体系综述。

Croatia: Health System Review.

机构信息

Andrija Stampar School of Public Health, University of Zagreb, School of Medicine.

Croatian Health Insurance Fund.

出版信息

Health Syst Transit. 2021 Nov;23(2):1-146.

PMID:34994691
Abstract

This analysis of the Croatian health system reviews developments in its organization and governance, financing, provision of services, health reforms and health system performance. Croatia has a mandatory social health insurance system with nearly universal population coverage and a generous benefits package. Although per capita spending is low when compared to other EU countries, the share of public spending as a proportion of current health expenditure is high and out-of-pocket payments are low. There are sufficient physical and human resources overall, but some more remote areas, such as the islands off the Adriatic coast and rural areas in central and eastern Croatia, face shortages. While the Croatian health system provides a high degree of financial protection, more can be achieved in terms of improving health outcomes. Several mortality rates are among the highest in the EU, including mortality from cancer, preventable causes (including lung cancer, alcohol-related causes and road traffic deaths) and air pollution. Quality monitoring systems are underdeveloped, but available indicators on quality of care suggest much scope for improvement. Another challenge is waiting times, which were already long in the years before 2020 and are bound to have increased as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

摘要

本报告对克罗地亚卫生系统进行了分析,涉及组织和治理、筹资、服务提供、卫生改革和卫生系统绩效等方面的发展情况。克罗地亚实行强制性社会保险制度,医疗保险几乎覆盖全民,福利优厚。尽管克罗地亚的人均卫生支出低于其他欧盟国家,但公共支出占当前卫生支出的比例较高,自付费用较低。总的来说,克罗地亚的物力和人力资源充足,但一些偏远地区,如亚得里亚海沿岸岛屿和克罗地亚中东部农村地区,面临短缺问题。尽管克罗地亚卫生系统提供了高度的财务保障,但在改善健康结果方面还有很大的提升空间。包括癌症、可预防原因(包括肺癌、与酒精有关的原因和道路交通死亡)和空气污染导致的死亡率在内,几项死亡率在欧盟中属于较高水平。质量监测系统不够发达,但现有的护理质量指标表明有很大的改进空间。另一个挑战是候诊时间,在 2020 年之前,候诊时间已经很长,而由于 COVID-19 大流行,候诊时间势必会进一步延长。

相似文献

1
Croatia: Health System Review.克罗地亚:卫生体系综述。
Health Syst Transit. 2021 Nov;23(2):1-146.
2
Croatia: health system review.克罗地亚:卫生系统评估
Health Syst Transit. 2014;16(3):xvii-xviii, 1-162.
3
Slovenia: Health System Review.斯洛文尼亚:国家卫生体系概况。
Health Syst Transit. 2021 Oct;23(1):1-183.
4
Kyrgyzstan: Health System Review.吉尔吉斯斯坦:卫生体系研究。
Health Syst Transit. 2022 Sep;24(3):1-180.
5
Czechia: Health System Review.捷克:卫生体系综述。
Health Syst Transit. 2023 Mar;25(1):1-216.
6
Georgia: Health System Review.佐治亚州:卫生系统评估
Health Syst Transit. 2017 Jul;19(4):1-90.
7
Germany: Health System Review.德国:卫生体系综述。
Health Syst Transit. 2020 Dec;22(6):1-272.
8
Switzerland: Health System Review.瑞士:卫生系统评估
Health Syst Transit. 2015;17(4):1-288, xix.
9
Netherlands: Health System Review.荷兰:卫生系统综述。
Health Syst Transit. 2016 Mar;18(2):1-240.
10
Romania: Health System Review.罗马尼亚:卫生系统评估
Health Syst Transit. 2016 Aug;18(4):1-170.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Employees' Attitudes and Awareness of Code of Ethics and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Survey at a Public Tertiary Hospital in Croatia.了解员工对道德准则的态度和认知及其相关因素:克罗地亚一家公立三级医院的横断面调查
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 27;13(17):2131. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13172131.
2
Barriers and facilitators for implementing WHO's Surgical Safety Checklist in a publicly funded hospital: a qualitative study from a tertiary-level public hospital in Croatia.在一家公立医院实施世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的障碍与促进因素:来自克罗地亚一家三级公立医院的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 30;15(6):e095155. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095155.
3
Perception of the ethical climate among hospital employees in a public healthcare system: a cross-sectional survey at the University Hospital of Split, Croatia.
公立医疗系统中医院员工对道德氛围的认知:克罗地亚斯普利特大学医院的横断面调查
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 May 7;26(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01217-1.
4
Pharmacy Customers' Attitudes Towards Expanded Pharmacy Services in Croatia.克罗地亚药房顾客对扩展药房服务的态度。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Dec 31;13(1):2. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy13010002.
5
Contextual factors influencing the use of digital health by patients and physicians in primary care: a scoping review protocol.影响基层医疗中患者和医生使用数字健康的背景因素:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e088169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088169.
6
Hybrid model: a promising type of public procurement in the healthcare sector of the European Union.混合模式:欧盟医疗保健领域有前景的一种公共采购类型。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 15;12:1359155. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1359155. eCollection 2024.
7
Why is the screening rate in lung cancer still low? A seven-country analysis of the factors affecting adoption.为什么肺癌筛查率仍然较低?影响采用因素的七国分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 9;11:1264342. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1264342. eCollection 2023.
8
Diversity awareness, diversity competency and access to healthcare for minority groups: perspectives of healthcare professionals in Croatia, Germany, Poland, and Slovenia.少数群体的多样性意识、多样性能力和获得医疗保健的机会:克罗地亚、德国、波兰和斯洛文尼亚医疗保健专业人员的观点。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 21;11:1204854. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1204854. eCollection 2023.
9
Decision-making on the fly: a qualitative study of physicians in out-of-hospital emergency medical services.临场决策:一项对院外急救医疗服务中的医生的定性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Jun 7;23(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00830-w.
10
The effectiveness of health care finance in promoting health: does the condition of health get better by spending more?医疗保健融资在促进健康方面的成效:增加支出就能改善健康状况吗?
Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Jun 6;42:95. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.42.95.35133. eCollection 2022.