Centre of Population Oral Health and Clinical Prevention, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Sungai Buloh, Selangor, 47000, Malaysia.
Department of Periodontology & Community Oral Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), Kuala Lumpur, 57000, Malaysia.
Nutr J. 2024 Jan 17;23(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12937-023-00884-3.
Excessive sugar consumption is well documented as a common risk factor for many Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs). Thus, an adequate intervention description is important to minimise research waste and improve research usability and reproducibility. A systematic review was conducted to identify components in published evidence interventions pertaining to the health promotions on reducing sugar intake among adults. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for quality appraisal. The period for the selected study was from 2000 to 2022, and articles were retrieved from Web of Science (WOS), Medline, Scopus, and PubMed. The target population was adults aged 18 years old and above who underwent intervention to assess the changes in their sugar intake. Data sources and all human epidemiologic studies were included. Out of the 9,333 papers identified, 25 were included. The overall quality of evidence of the studies was considered moderate. Apart from the characteristics of the reviewed studies, components of interventions are including the basis of theoretical or model for the intervention, which majority use Social Cognitive Theory, followed by PRECEDE-PROCEED model, socio-ecological and process-improvement theories and Transtheoretical Model; providers, who are commercial provider, qualified nutritionist, professor of nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics, doctor, dietitian nutritionist, lifestyle coaches, and junior public health nurses; duration of the intervention and follow-up time, varies from as short as one month to as long as 24 months; material provided either softcopy or hardcopy; tailoring approach, based on the individual goals, the process of change, genotype analysis, beliefs, barriers, and sociocultural norms; delivery mechanism either face-to-face or technology-mediated; and tools to measure the sugar consumption outcome mostly used Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), besides 24-h dietary recalls, and food diaries. There are various components in downstream health promotion to reduce sugar intake among adults that can be adapted according to the local health promotion and intervention context. More well-designed interventions using integration components are encouraged in further studies.
过量摄入糖已被充分证实是许多非传染性疾病(NCD)的一个常见危险因素。因此,充分描述干预措施对于减少研究浪费、提高研究可用性和可重复性非常重要。本研究进行了一项系统评价,旨在确定已发表的与减少成年人糖摄入量相关的健康促进干预措施中所包含的内容。该评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明进行,并使用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)进行质量评估。选择研究的时间范围为 2000 年至 2022 年,文章从 Web of Science(WOS)、Medline、Scopus 和 PubMed 中检索。目标人群为年龄在 18 岁及以上接受干预以评估其糖摄入量变化的成年人。纳入数据来源和所有人类流行病学研究。在确定的 9333 篇论文中,有 25 篇被纳入。研究的总体证据质量被认为是中等的。除了被评价研究的特征外,干预措施的组成部分还包括干预的理论或模型基础,其中大部分使用社会认知理论,其次是 PRECEDE-PROCEED 模型、社会生态和过程改进理论以及跨理论模型;提供者包括商业提供者、合格营养师、营养基因组学和营养遗传学教授、医生、营养师、生活方式教练和初级公共卫生护士;干预和随访时间长短不一,从一个月到 24 个月不等;提供的材料既有软拷贝也有硬拷贝;定制方法基于个人目标、改变过程、基因型分析、信念、障碍和社会文化规范;提供方式既可以是面对面也可以是技术介导;测量糖摄入量结果的工具主要使用食物频率问卷(FFQ),此外还有 24 小时膳食回忆和食物日记。在降低成年人糖摄入量的下游健康促进中存在各种组成部分,可以根据当地的健康促进和干预背景进行调整。鼓励在进一步的研究中使用整合组成部分的更精心设计的干预措施。