Indiana University School of Health and Human Sciences (A.R.C), Indianapolis, Indiana.
Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Hospital (L.S.W), Indiana University School of Medicine, Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 May;63(5):721-728. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.032. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
The distinct illness trajectory after acute ischemic stroke demands a better understanding of the utilization of palliative care consultations (PCC) for this patient cohort. This study sought to determine the prevalence, predictors, and outcomes associated with PCC for patients hospitalized with severe ischemic stroke.
This multicenter cohort study was conducted at four hospitals (2 comprehensive and 2 primary stroke centers) between January, 2016 and December, 2019. We included all patients with a discharge diagnosis of ischemic stroke and an initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) of 10 or greater. We compared patient sociodemographic, clinical and care characteristics as well as hospital outcomes between patients who did and did not receive PCC.
The study included 1297 patients hospitalized with severe ischemic stroke. PCC occurred for 20% of all patients and this proportion varied across institutions from 11.9% to 43%. Less than half (43%) of patients who died in the hospital. In multivaraible analysis, PCC was less likely in female patients (OR .76, 95% CI .59, .99, P=0.04) but more likely in patients with higher NIHSS (OR1.95, 95% CI 1,13, 3.37, P=0.02). Patients with PCC had higher rates of moving to a plan focused on comfort measures (CMO) (P<0.01) and removal of artificial nutrition as part of a move to CMO (P<0.01). In a sub analysis of patients who died in the hospital and received PCC, patients who died on or before hospital day 3 were less likely to receive PCC than patients who died on or after hospital day 4 (24% v. 51%) (P=<0.01).
Most patients with severe stroke do not receive PCC, even among those who experience in-hospital death. The results of this study indicate there are missed opportunities for PCC to help reduce suffering after severe stroke.
急性缺血性脑卒中后独特的疾病进程要求更好地了解姑息治疗咨询(PCC)在这一患者群体中的应用。本研究旨在确定因严重缺血性脑卒中住院的患者接受 PCC 的比例、预测因素和结局。
这项多中心队列研究于 2016 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月在四家医院(2 家综合医院和 2 家初级卒中中心)进行。我们纳入了所有出院诊断为缺血性脑卒中且初始 NIH 卒中量表(NIHSS)评分≥10 分的患者。我们比较了接受和未接受 PCC 的患者的社会人口统计学、临床和护理特征以及医院结局。
该研究纳入了 1297 例因严重缺血性脑卒中住院的患者。20%的患者接受了 PCC,不同机构的比例从 11.9%到 43%不等。不到一半(43%)的住院死亡患者。多变量分析显示,女性患者接受 PCC 的可能性较小(OR.76,95%CI.59,.99,P=0.04),但 NIHSS 较高的患者接受 PCC 的可能性更大(OR1.95,95%CI 1,13,3.37,P=0.02)。接受 PCC 的患者更有可能制定以舒适护理(CMO)为重点的计划(P<0.01),并将人工营养作为转向 CMO 的一部分进行移除(P<0.01)。在对住院期间死亡并接受 PCC 的患者进行的亚组分析中,与住院第 4 天或之后死亡的患者相比,在第 3 天或之前死亡的患者接受 PCC 的可能性更小(24%比 51%)(P<0.01)。
大多数严重脑卒中患者没有接受 PCC,即使是那些在住院期间死亡的患者。本研究的结果表明,在严重脑卒中后,有机会提供 PCC 以减轻痛苦,但机会被错过了。