• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓损伤后改变肠道护理实践的障碍和促进因素:理论领域框架方法。

Barriers and facilitators to changing bowel care practices after spinal cord injury: a Theoretical Domains Framework approach.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.

International Collaboration on Repair and Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 2022 Jul;60(7):664-673. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00743-0. Epub 2022 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1038/s41393-021-00743-0
PMID:34997189
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9287175/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Improvement to autonomic processes such as bladder, bowel and sexual function are prioritised by individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Bowel care is associated with high levels of dissatisfaction and decreased quality of life. Despite dissatisfaction, 71% of individuals have not changed their bowel care routine for at least 5 years, highlighting a disconnect between dissatisfaction with bowel care and changing routines to optimise bowel care.

OBJECTIVE

Using an integrated knowledge translation approach, we aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators to making changes to bowel care in individuals with SCI.

METHODS

Our approach was guided by the Behaviour Change Wheel and used the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals with SCI (n = 13, mean age 48.6 ± 13.1 years) and transcribed verbatim (duration 31.9 ± 7.1 min). Barriers and facilitators were extracted, deductively coded using TDF domains and inductively analysed for themes within domains.

RESULTS

Changing bowel care after SCI was heavily influenced by four TDF domains: environmental context and resources (workplace flexibility, opportunity or circumstance, and access to resources); beliefs about consequences; social influences (perceived support and peer mentorship); and knowledge (knowledge of physiological processes and bowel care options). All intervention functions and policy categories were considered viable intervention options, with human (61%) and digital (33%) platforms preferred.

CONCLUSIONS

Modifying bowel care is a multi-factorial behaviour. These findings will support the systematic development and implementation of future interventions to both enable individuals with SCI to change their bowel care and to facilitate the optimisation of bowel care approaches.

摘要

背景

改善自主功能,如膀胱、肠道和性功能,是脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的首要任务。肠道护理与高水平的不满和生活质量下降有关。尽管不满意,71%的人至少 5 年来没有改变他们的肠道护理常规,这突显了对肠道护理的不满与改变常规以优化肠道护理之间的脱节。

目的

采用综合知识转化方法,探讨改变 SCI 患者肠道护理的障碍和促进因素。

方法

我们的方法以行为改变轮为指导,并使用理论领域框架(TDF)。对 13 名 SCI 患者(平均年龄 48.6±13.1 岁)进行了半结构化访谈,并逐字记录(持续时间 31.9±7.1 分钟)。提取障碍和促进因素,使用 TDF 域进行演绎编码,并对域内主题进行归纳分析。

结果

SCI 后改变肠道护理受到四个 TDF 域的强烈影响:环境背景和资源(工作场所的灵活性、机会或环境,以及资源的获取);信念关于后果;社会影响(感知支持和同伴指导);和知识(生理过程和肠道护理选项的知识)。所有干预功能和政策类别都被认为是可行的干预选择,人类(61%)和数字(33%)平台更受欢迎。

结论

改变肠道护理是一种多因素行为。这些发现将支持系统地开发和实施未来的干预措施,使 SCI 患者能够改变他们的肠道护理,并促进肠道护理方法的优化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9df/9287175/93d2e99a78dc/41393_2021_743_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9df/9287175/82d9833a63b8/41393_2021_743_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9df/9287175/2ff656447739/41393_2021_743_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9df/9287175/77695a54a0a4/41393_2021_743_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9df/9287175/93d2e99a78dc/41393_2021_743_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9df/9287175/82d9833a63b8/41393_2021_743_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9df/9287175/2ff656447739/41393_2021_743_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9df/9287175/77695a54a0a4/41393_2021_743_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9df/9287175/93d2e99a78dc/41393_2021_743_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to changing bowel care practices after spinal cord injury: a Theoretical Domains Framework approach.脊髓损伤后改变肠道护理实践的障碍和促进因素:理论领域框架方法。
Spinal Cord. 2022 Jul;60(7):664-673. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00743-0. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
2
Exploring smoking cessation experiences among persons with spinal cord injury: Informing theory-based recommendations for interventions.探索脊髓损伤患者的戒烟经验:为基于理论的干预措施提供信息。
Spinal Cord. 2023 Jan;61(1):27-36. doi: 10.1038/s41393-022-00856-0. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
3
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a school-based physical activity policy in Canada: application of the theoretical domains framework.加拿大实施校本体育活动政策的障碍与促进因素:理论领域框架的应用
BMC Public Health. 2017 Oct 23;17(1):835. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4846-y.
4
Enhancing participation while aging with spinal cord injury: applying behaviour change frameworks to develop intervention recommendations.增强脊髓损伤后老龄化过程中的参与度:应用行为改变框架制定干预建议。
Spinal Cord. 2021 Jun;59(6):665-674. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-00555-8. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
5
Barriers and facilitators to clinical behaviour change by primary care practitioners: a theory-informed systematic review of reviews using the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Wheel.基层医疗保健从业者临床行为改变的障碍和促进因素:使用理论领域框架和行为改变轮对综述的理论启发式系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 30;11(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02030-2.
6
Designing strategies to implement a blunt chest injury care bundle using the behaviour change wheel: a multi-site mixed methods study.运用行为改变轮设计实施钝性胸部损伤护理包的策略:多地点混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 8;19(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4177-z.
7
Factors influencing the prescribing behaviour of independent prescriber optometrists: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.影响独立处方配镜师处方行为的因素:使用理论领域框架的定性研究。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 Mar;41(2):301-315. doi: 10.1111/opo.12782. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
8
Women's experiences of living with neurogenic bladder and bowel after spinal cord injury: life controlled by bladder and bowel.脊髓损伤后女性神经源性膀胱和肠道的生活体验:被膀胱和肠道控制的生活。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(6):573-81. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1049378. Epub 2015 May 27.
9
General practitioner views on the determinants of test ordering: a theory-based qualitative approach to the development of an intervention to improve immunoglobulin requests in primary care.全科医生对检查开单决定因素的看法:一种基于理论的定性方法,用于开发一项改善基层医疗中免疫球蛋白申请的干预措施。
Implement Sci. 2016 Jul 19;11(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0465-8.
10
Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Breaking Up Sitting Time among Desk-Based Office Workers: A Qualitative Investigation Using the TDF and COM-B.基于 TDF 和 COM-B 的定性研究:探究伏案办公人员打破久坐行为的阻碍和促进因素
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 14;16(16):2903. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162903.

引用本文的文献

1
Using the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify strategies to support the implementation of the guidelines for the physiotherapy management of people with spinal cord injury: a qualitative study.运用理论领域框架确定支持脊髓损伤患者物理治疗管理指南实施的策略:一项定性研究。
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2025 Aug 28;11(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s41394-025-00719-9.
2
Engagement of People With Lived Experience in Spinal Cord Injury to Address Innovation Priorities.让脊髓损伤患者参与进来以确定创新重点。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70369. doi: 10.1111/hex.70369.
3
Bowel and Bladder Dysfunction after SCI: A Comparison between India and Canada.

本文引用的文献

1
Delivering Behaviour Change Interventions: Development of a Mode of Delivery Ontology.提供行为改变干预措施:一种交付模式本体的开发
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Feb 26;5:125. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15906.2. eCollection 2020.
2
Integrated Knowledge Translation Guiding Principles for Conducting and Disseminating Spinal Cord Injury Research in Partnership.在合作中进行和传播脊髓损伤研究的综合知识转化指导原则。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Apr;102(4):656-663. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.393. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
3
Enhancing participation while aging with spinal cord injury: applying behaviour change frameworks to develop intervention recommendations.
脊髓损伤后肠和膀胱功能障碍:印度与加拿大的比较。
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2024 Summer;30(3):1-9. doi: 10.46292/sci23-00058. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
4
Bowel burdens: a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the relationships between bowel dysfunction and quality of life after spinal cord injury.肠道负担:一项系统评价和荟萃分析,研究脊髓损伤后肠道功能障碍与生活质量之间的关系。
Spinal Cord. 2024 Sep;62(9):495-506. doi: 10.1038/s41393-024-01002-8. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
5
A data extraction template for the behaviour change intervention ontology.行为改变干预本体的数据提取模板。
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Mar 26;9:168. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20872.1. eCollection 2024.
6
Facilitators and barriers in the rehabilitation process described by persons with spinal cord injury: a deductive-inductive analysis from the Finnish spinal cord injury study.脊髓损伤患者描述的康复过程中的促进因素和障碍:来自芬兰脊髓损伤研究的演绎-归纳分析。
Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2303398. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2303398. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
增强脊髓损伤后老龄化过程中的参与度:应用行为改变框架制定干预建议。
Spinal Cord. 2021 Jun;59(6):665-674. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-00555-8. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
4
How does integrated knowledge translation (IKT) compare to other collaborative research approaches to generating and translating knowledge? Learning from experts in the field.综合知识转化(IKT)与其他协作研究方法在生成和转化知识方面有何不同?向该领域的专家学习。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Mar 30;18(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0539-6.
5
Guidance for behavioural interventions aiming to support family support providers of people with spinal cord injury: A scoping review.旨在支持脊髓损伤患者家属支持提供者的行为干预措施指南:范围综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Feb;246:112456. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112456. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
6
Clinical recommendations for use of lidocaine lubricant during bowel care after spinal cord injury prolong care routines and worsen autonomic dysreflexia: results from a randomised clinical trial.临床建议在脊髓损伤后进行肠道护理时使用利多卡因润滑剂,这会延长护理程序并加重自主反射异常:一项随机临床试验的结果。
Spinal Cord. 2020 Apr;58(4):430-440. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0381-2. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
7
Peer mentorship for adults with spinal cord injury: a static group comparison between mentees and non-mentees' reported coping strategies.脊髓损伤成年人的同伴指导:受指导者与非受指导者所报告应对策略的静态组比较
Spinal Cord. 2018 Nov;56(11):1102-1109. doi: 10.1038/s41393-018-0197-5. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
8
A Community Perspective on Bowel Management and Quality of Life after Spinal Cord Injury: The Influence of Autonomic Dysreflexia.社区视角下脊髓损伤后肠道管理和生活质量:自主反射异常的影响。
J Neurotrauma. 2018 May 1;35(9):1091-1105. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5343. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
9
Evidence-based scientific exercise guidelines for adults with spinal cord injury: an update and a new guideline.脊髓损伤成人循证科学运动指南:更新版及新指南
Spinal Cord. 2018 Apr;56(4):308-321. doi: 10.1038/s41393-017-0017-3. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
10
Spinal Cord Injury Peer Mentorship: Applying Self-Determination Theory to Explain Quality of Life and Participation.脊髓损伤同伴指导:应用自我决定理论解释生活质量和参与度。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Mar;99(3):468-476.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.487. Epub 2017 Sep 22.