Kendler Kenneth S
Virginia Institute of Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, and Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2022 Jan;189(1-2):6-15. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32885. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
The year 1900 saw not only the rediscovery of Mendel's hybridization studies but also the publication by Karl Pearson of his newly developed tetrachoric correlation which he used to study the parent-offspring resemblance for the "insane diathesis" in 1905. This was followed by more detailed reports by two of his students/associates: Heron in 1907 and Goring in 1909. Both calculated the tetrachoric correlation for insanity in parent-offspring and Heron for sib-sib pairs. Estimates ranged from approximately +0.30 to +0.60. These papers were statistically sophisticated but demonstrated minimal interest in the phenotype being studied. They are of historical interest because they laid the groundwork for biometrical psychiatric genetics which emerged as a major research paradigm in latter third of the 20th century. In a biting critique of Heron's paper by a young Ernst Rüdin, we see the beginnings of a long-running argument in psychiatric genetics about the relative value of detailed phenotyping versus novel statistical methods and of Mendelian versus Biometrical methods. While much interest has focused on the eugenic orientation of German psychiatric genetics in the early 20th century, these early British biometrical geneticists, like the majority of geneticists of that day, were also ardent advocates of the eugenic application of their research results.
1900年,不仅孟德尔的杂交研究被重新发现,卡尔·皮尔逊还发表了他新开发的四分相关法,他在1905年用该方法研究了“精神错乱素质”的亲子相似性。随后,他的两名学生/同事发表了更详细的报告:1907年的赫伦和1909年的戈林。两人都计算了亲子间精神错乱的四分相关,赫伦还计算了同胞间的四分相关。估计值约为+0.30至+0.60。这些论文在统计学上很复杂,但对所研究的表型兴趣不大。它们具有历史意义,因为它们为生物统计学精神病遗传学奠定了基础,而生物统计学精神病遗传学在20世纪后三分之一时期成为了一种主要的研究范式。在年轻的恩斯特·吕丁对赫伦论文的尖锐批评中,我们看到了精神病遗传学中一场长期争论的开端,这场争论涉及详细表型分析与新统计方法的相对价值,以及孟德尔方法与生物统计学方法的相对价值。虽然很多人关注20世纪初德国精神病遗传学的优生学倾向,但这些早期的英国生物统计学遗传学家,和当时的大多数遗传学家一样,也是其研究成果优生学应用的热心倡导者。