• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

广义羞耻感自评量表的系统评价

A systematic review of self-report measures of generalized shame.

机构信息

Portland Psychotherapy Clinic, Research, and Training Center, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Department of Psychology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 2022 Jul;78(7):1288-1330. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23311. Epub 2022 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1002/jclp.23311
PMID:34997972
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Shame is a transdiagnostic emotion of strong clinical and research interest. Yet, there is a lack of consensus on the definition and varying methods employed across self-report measures, potentially affecting our ability to accurately study shame and examine whether clinical interventions to alter shame are effective. This paper offers a systematic review of self-report measures of generalized shame.

METHODS

PubMed, PsycInfo, and Web of Science were searched. Studies were included when they were available in English and the primary aim was to evaluate measurement properties of scales or subscales designed to measure generalized shame in adults.

RESULTS

Thirty-six papers examining 19 scales were identified, with measures of trait shame more common than state shame. Construct validity, internal consistency, and structural validity were relative strengths. Development and content validity studies were lacking and suffered from low methodological quality.

CONCLUSIONS

All measures evaluated needed additional research to meet criteria for recommended use.

摘要

目的

羞耻是一种具有强烈临床和研究意义的跨诊断情绪。然而,在自我报告测量中,羞耻的定义和使用的方法缺乏共识,这可能会影响我们准确研究羞耻的能力,并检验改变羞耻的临床干预是否有效。本文对广义羞耻的自我报告测量进行了系统回顾。

方法

检索了 PubMed、PsycInfo 和 Web of Science。当研究报告可用且主要目的是评估设计用于评估成年人普遍羞耻感的量表或分量表的测量特性时,研究将被纳入。

结果

确定了 36 篇研究报告,共涉及 19 个量表,特质羞耻的测量比状态羞耻更为常见。构念效度、内部一致性和结构效度是相对优势。发展和内容效度研究缺乏,且存在低方法质量的问题。

结论

所有评估的测量工具都需要进一步的研究,以符合推荐使用的标准。

相似文献

1
A systematic review of self-report measures of generalized shame.广义羞耻感自评量表的系统评价
J Clin Psychol. 2022 Jul;78(7):1288-1330. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23311. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
2
A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy-report of children's physical literacy or constituting elements.系统评价教师代理报告儿童身体素养或构成要素的工具。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 8;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01162-3.
3
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
6
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 14;9(9):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub6.
7
A systematic review to examine the impact of psycho-educational interventions on health outcomes and costs in adults and children with difficult asthma.一项系统性综述,旨在研究心理教育干预对患有难治性哮喘的成人和儿童的健康结局及成本的影响。
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Jun;9(23):iii-iv, 1-167. doi: 10.3310/hta9230.
8
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub7.
9
Heated tobacco products for smoking cessation and reducing smoking prevalence.加热烟草制品戒烟和降低吸烟率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 6;1(1):CD013790. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013790.pub2.
10
Ear drops for the removal of ear wax.用于清除耳垢的滴耳剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 25;7(7):CD012171. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012171.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Conceptualization and Assessment of Shame Experience and Regulation: An Umbrella Review of Synthesis Studies.羞耻体验与调节的概念化及评估:综合研究的概述性综述
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2025 Jul-Aug;32(4):e70136. doi: 10.1002/cpp.70136.
2
The parent-child relationship and child shame and guilt: A meta-analytic systematic review.亲子关系与儿童的羞耻感和内疚感:一项元分析系统评价
Child Dev. 2025 May-Jun;96(3):907-929. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14212. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
3
Internalized Shame Among Justice-Involved Women in Substance Use Disorder Treatment: Measurement Invariance and Changes During Treatment.
物质使用障碍治疗中涉及司法问题的女性的内化羞耻感:测量不变性及治疗期间的变化
Stigma Health. 2024 Aug;9(3):303-310. doi: 10.1037/sah0000427. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
4
Methodological quality of 100 recent systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments: an overview of reviews.100 篇近期健康相关结局测评工具系统评价的方法学质量:综述概览。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Oct;33(10):2593-2609. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03706-z. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
5
A brief measure of guilt and shame: validation of the Guilt and Shame Questionnaire (GSQ-8).内疚与羞耻感的简短测量:内疚与羞耻问卷(GSQ - 8)的效度验证
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Dec;13(2):2146720. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2146720. Epub 2022 Dec 19.