Akatsuka Masayuki, Masuda Yoshiki, Tatsumi Hiroomi, Sonoda Tomoko
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Clin Ther. 2022 Feb;44(2):295-303. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.12.008. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
The efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) administration in patients with sepsis or septic shock remains unclear. A single-center retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the association between IVIG supplementation and favorable outcomes in patients with sepsis and low serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels.
A total of 239 patients with sepsis were identified whose serum IgG levels were determined upon admission to the intensive care unit between January 2014 and March 2021. Patients with low IgG levels (<670 mg/dL) were divided into the IVIG and non-IVIG groups. Patient data were collected from electronic medical records to evaluate the patients' characteristics, sepsis severity, and prognosis. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. The propensity score was calculated by using the following variables: age, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, immunocompromised status, and serum IgG levels. Logistic regression analysis using propensity score as the adjusted variable was performed to evaluate the outcome.
Of 239 patients, 87 had low IgG levels. Of these patients, 47 received IVIG therapy. The 28-day (odds ratio [OR], 0.15; 95% CI, 0.04-0.54; P = 0.004) and 90-day (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.11-0.83; P = 0.020) mortality rates were significantly lower in the IVIG group than in the non-IVIG group. Moreover, the number of days free from renal replacement therapy was significantly higher in the IVIG group than in the non-IVIG group (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.11; P = 0.025). Serum IgG levels in the IVIG group showed no significant difference compared with those in the non-IVIG group. No significant differences in the patients' characteristics were observed between the groups.
This study found that IVIG administration in patients with sepsis and low serum IgG levels was associated with improved prognosis. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the validity of IVIG therapy for patients with sepsis and low serum IgG levels.
静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)对脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者的疗效仍不明确。本研究通过单中心回顾性研究,评估补充IVIG与血清免疫球蛋白G(IgG)水平低的脓毒症患者良好预后之间的关联。
纳入2014年1月至2021年3月期间入住重症监护病房时测定血清IgG水平的239例脓毒症患者。IgG水平低(<670mg/dL)的患者被分为IVIG组和非IVIG组。从电子病历中收集患者数据,以评估患者特征、脓毒症严重程度和预后。主要结局为28天死亡率。使用以下变量计算倾向评分:年龄、序贯器官衰竭评估评分、免疫功能低下状态和血清IgG水平。以倾向评分为校正变量进行逻辑回归分析以评估结局。
239例患者中,87例IgG水平低。其中,47例接受了IVIG治疗。IVIG组的28天(优势比[OR],0.15;95%可信区间[CI],0.04-0.54;P = 0.004)和90天(OR,0.31;95%CI,0.11-0.83;P = 0.020)死亡率显著低于非IVIG组。此外,IVIG组无需进行肾脏替代治疗的天数显著多于非IVIG组(OR,1.06;95%CI,1.01-1.11;P = 0.025)。IVIG组的血清IgG水平与非IVIG组相比无显著差异。两组患者的特征无显著差异。
本研究发现,对血清IgG水平低的脓毒症患者给予IVIG与改善预后相关。有必要进一步研究评估IVIG治疗对血清IgG水平低的脓毒症患者的有效性。