Kim D, Davis P, Lekić V, Maguire R, Compaire N, Schimmel M, Stutzmann E, Irving J C E, Lognonné P, Scholz J-R, Clinton J, Zenhäusern G, Dahmen N, Deng S, Levander A, Panning M P, Garcia R F, Giardini D, Hurst K, Knapmeyer-Endrun B, Nimmo F, Pike W T, Pou L, Schmerr N, Stähler S C, Tauzin B, Widmer-Schnidrig R, Banerdt W B
Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Department of Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Bull Seismol Soc Am. 2021;111(6):2982-3002. doi: 10.1785/0120210123. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
The Seismic Experiment for Interior Structure (SEIS) of the mission to Mars, has been providing direct information on Martian interior structure and dynamics of that planet since it landed. Compared to seismic recordings on Earth, ground motion measurements acquired by SEIS on Mars are made under dramatically different ambient noise conditions, but include idiosyncratic signals that arise from coupling between different sensors and spacecraft components. This work is to synthesize what is known about these signal types, illustrate how they can manifest in waveforms and noise correlations, and present pitfalls in structural interpretations based on standard seismic analysis methods. We show that glitches, a type of prominent transient signal, can produce artifacts in ambient noise correlations. Sustained signals that vary in frequency, such as lander modes which are affected by variations in temperature and wind conditions over the course of the Martian Sol, can also contaminate ambient noise results. Therefore, both types of signals have the potential to bias interpretation in terms of subsurface layering. We illustrate that signal processing in the presence of identified nonseismic signals must be informed by an understanding of the underlying physical processes in order for high fidelity waveforms of ground motion to be extracted. While the origins of most idiosyncratic signals are well understood, the 2.4 Hz resonance remains debated and the literature does not contain an explanation of its fine spectral structure. Even though the selection of idiosyncratic signal types discussed in this paper may not be exhaustive, we provide guidance on best practices for enhancing the robustness of structural interpretations.
火星探测任务中的内部结构地震实验(SEIS)自着陆以来,一直在提供有关火星内部结构和该行星动力学的直接信息。与地球上的地震记录相比,SEIS在火星上获取的地面运动测量是在截然不同的环境噪声条件下进行的,但其中包括因不同传感器和航天器部件之间的耦合而产生的特殊信号。这项工作旨在综合关于这些信号类型的已知信息,说明它们如何在波形和噪声相关性中表现出来,并指出基于标准地震分析方法进行结构解释时存在的陷阱。我们表明,毛刺(一种突出的瞬态信号)会在环境噪声相关性中产生伪迹。频率变化的持续信号,例如受火星日期间温度和风况变化影响的着陆器模式,也会干扰环境噪声结果。因此,这两种类型的信号都有可能在地下分层解释方面产生偏差。我们说明,在存在已识别的非地震信号的情况下进行信号处理时,必须了解潜在的物理过程,以便提取高保真的地面运动波形。虽然大多数特殊信号的起源已得到很好的理解,但2.4赫兹共振仍存在争议,并且文献中没有对其精细频谱结构的解释。尽管本文讨论的特殊信号类型选择可能并不详尽,但我们提供了关于增强结构解释稳健性的最佳实践指南。