Blown Eric J, Bryce Tom G K
University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Res Sci Educ. 2022;52(6):1869-1908. doi: 10.1007/s11165-021-10032-8. Epub 2022 Jan 1.
This paper provides a historical review of the interview research that has been used by science educators to investigate children's basic astronomy knowledge. A wide range of strategies have been developed over the last 120 years or so as successive teams of researchers have endeavoured to overcome the methodological difficulties that have arisen. Hence, it looks critically at the techniques that have been developed to tackle the problems associated with interviews, questionnaires and tests used to research cognitive development and knowledge acquisition. We examine those methodologies which seem to yield surer indications of how young people (at different ages) understand everyday astronomical phenomena-the field often referred to as '. Theoretical ideas from cognitive psychology, educational instruction and neuroscience are examined in depth and utilised to critique matters such as the importance of subject mastery and pedagogical content knowledge on the part of interviewers; the merits of multi-media techniques; the roles of open-ended vs. structured methods of interviewing; and the need always to recognise the dynamism of memory in interviewees. With illustrations and protocol excerpts drawn from recent studies, the paper points to what researchers might usefully tackle in the years ahead and the pitfalls to be avoided.
本文对科学教育工作者用于调查儿童基础天文学知识的访谈研究进行了历史回顾。在过去约120年里,随着研究团队相继努力克服出现的方法学难题,已开发出了一系列广泛的策略。因此,本文批判性地审视了为解决与用于研究认知发展和知识获取的访谈、问卷及测试相关的问题而开发的技术。我们考察了那些似乎能更可靠地表明年轻人(在不同年龄段)如何理解日常天文现象的方法——该领域常被称为……深入研究了认知心理学、教育教学及神经科学的理论观点,并将其用于批判诸如访谈者学科掌握和教学内容知识的重要性、多媒体技术的优点、开放式与结构化访谈方法的作用以及始终认识到受访者记忆动态性的必要性等问题。通过引用近期研究中的示例和访谈记录片段,本文指出了研究人员在未来几年可能有益地处理的问题以及应避免的陷阱。