Liu Rongzhi, Huo Yuxin, He Jing, Zuo Dun, Qiu Zhiqiang, Zhao Jun
School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, China.
Xinyu High-Tech Development Zone Tax Bureau, Xinyu, China.
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 22;12:719476. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.719476. eCollection 2021.
This study aims to explore the effects of entrepreneurship education by examining the influences of the curriculum system, teaching team, design of practical programs, and the institutional systems on universities' entrepreneurial education performance. This paper employs a case-based approach-Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). Data were collected from 12 universities that were typical cases in the implementation of entrepreneurial education. The four dimensions of entrepreneurship education are applied as conditional indicators. fsQCA3.0 software is used to analyze the necessary conditions and condition combination of the truth table. There are three sets of condition combinations of the intermediate solution that results in a high level of entrepreneurial education performance: (1) when the credit ratio of entrepreneurship courses is higher and there are more practical platform platforms, even if the entrepreneurship education system and mechanism is less mature, the level of entrepreneurial education performance is high; (2) with a higher credit ratio of entrepreneurship courses, higher quality of teaching teams, and higher standard of practical platforms, the level of entrepreneurial education performance is high; (3) with a higher level of credit ratio of entrepreneurship courses and more practical platforms, as well as mature entrepreneurship education system and mechanism, even if the quality of the teaching team is lower, the level of entrepreneurial education performance is satisfied. The dimensions of entrepreneurship education can be expanded; additionally, given that there are many other factors affecting entrepreneurial performance, it is necessary to identify and integrate other possible factors on an ongoing basis. This study offers practical implications for universities and policy makers that can promote the transformation of theoretical knowledge into practice in the field of entrepreneurship in colleges and universities. This study is one of the first to empirically examine the effect of institutional-driven entrepreneurship education in developing countries. The enhancement of entrepreneurship education can benefit the development of individuals and schools, and even has a potential impact on the progress of the country and society as a whole. This study emphasizes the significance of viewing the entrepreneurial education as a multi-dimensional concept by targeting different kinds of players. Furthermore, it employs a case-based approach to identify configurations of the antecedent attributes of the curriculum system, teaching team, design of practical programs, and the institutional systems, and their influence on universities' entrepreneurial education performance.
本研究旨在通过考察课程体系、教学团队、实践项目设计以及制度体系对大学创业教育绩效的影响,来探索创业教育的效果。本文采用基于案例的方法——定性比较分析(QCA)。数据收集自12所大学,这些大学是创业教育实施中的典型案例。创业教育的四个维度被用作条件指标。使用fsQCA3.0软件分析真值表的必要条件和条件组合。中间解有三组条件组合可导致高水平的创业教育绩效:(1)当创业课程学分占比更高且有更多实践平台时,即使创业教育体系和机制不太成熟,创业教育绩效水平也较高;(2)创业课程学分占比更高、教学团队质量更高且实践平台标准更高时,创业教育绩效水平较高;(3)创业课程学分占比更高、实践平台更多,以及创业教育体系和机制成熟,即使教学团队质量较低,创业教育绩效水平也令人满意。创业教育的维度可以扩展;此外,鉴于影响创业绩效的其他因素众多,有必要持续识别和整合其他可能的因素。本研究为大学和政策制定者提供了实际启示,有助于促进高校创业领域理论知识向实践的转化。本研究是首批实证检验发展中国家制度驱动型创业教育效果的研究之一。创业教育的加强有利于个人和学校的发展,甚至可能对国家和社会整体的进步产生潜在影响。本研究强调了将创业教育视为一个针对不同参与者的多维度概念的重要性。此外,它采用基于案例的方法来识别课程体系、教学团队、实践项目设计和制度体系的先行属性配置及其对大学创业教育绩效的影响。