Geraedts Victor J, van Ham Rogier A P, van Hilten Jacobus J, Mosch Arne, Hoffmann Carel F E, van der Gaag Niels A, Contarino Maria Fiorella
Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands.
Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 24;12:775784. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.775784. eCollection 2021.
It is currently unknown whether results from intraoperative test stimulation of two types of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), either during awake pallidal (GPi) or thalamic (Vim), are comparable to the results generated by chronic stimulation through the definitive lead. To determine whether side-effects-thresholds from intraoperative test stimulation are indicative of postoperative stimulation findings. Records of consecutive patients who received GPi or Vim were analyzed. Thresholds for the induction of either capsular or non-capsular side-effects were compared at matched depths and at group-level. Records of fifty-two patients were analyzed (20 GPis, 75 Vims). The induction of side-effects was not significantly different between intraoperative and postoperative assessments at matched depths, although a large variability was observed (capsular: GPi DBS: = 0.79; Vim DBS: = 0.68); non-capsular: GPi DBS: = 0.20; and Vim DBS: = 0.35). Linear mixed-effect models revealed no differences between intraoperative and postoperative assessments, although the Vim had significantly lower thresholds (capsular side-effects = 0.01, non-capsular side-effects < 0.01). Unpaired survival analyses demonstrated lower intraoperative than postoperative thresholds for capsular side-effects in patients under GPi DBS ( = 0.01), while higher intraoperative thresholds for non-capsular side-effects in patients under Vim DBS ( = 0.01). There were no significant differences between intraoperative and postoperative assessments of GPi and Vim DBS, although thresholds cannot be directly extrapolated at an individual level due to high variability.
目前尚不清楚,在清醒状态下进行苍白球内侧部(GPi)或丘脑腹中间核(Vim)两种类型的脑深部电刺激(DBS)时,术中测试刺激的结果是否与通过最终电极进行慢性刺激所产生的结果相当。目的是确定术中测试刺激的副作用阈值是否能指示术后刺激结果。分析了接受GPi或Vim治疗的连续患者的记录。在匹配深度和组水平上比较了诱发包膜或非包膜副作用的阈值。分析了52例患者的记录(20例GPi,75例Vim)。在匹配深度下,术中与术后评估之间副作用的诱发没有显著差异,尽管观察到有很大的变异性(包膜:GPi DBS: = 0.79;Vim DBS: = 0.68);非包膜:GPi DBS: = 0.20;Vim DBS: = 0.35)。线性混合效应模型显示术中与术后评估之间没有差异,尽管Vim的阈值显著更低(包膜副作用 = 0.01,非包膜副作用 < 0.01)。非配对生存分析表明,GPi DBS患者术中包膜副作用的阈值低于术后( = 0.01),而Vim DBS患者术中非包膜副作用的阈值更高( = 0.01)。GPi和Vim DBS的术中与术后评估之间没有显著差异,尽管由于变异性高,不能在个体水平上直接推断阈值。