Weedn Victor W
Acad Forensic Pathol. 2021 Dec;11(4):185-195. doi: 10.1177/19253621211060961. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
Judicial scrutiny of the forensic sciences is increasing. This scrutiny targets the bases for expert opinions. Forensic pathologists must understand that when they express an opinion it must have an articulable underlying basis. provides a cautionary tale where testimony from a forensic pathologist on the cause and manner of death based exclusively on police reports and audio and video recordings of police interviews of the suspect rather than on medical evidence were held to be inadmissible. has an odd and distinguishable set of facts, but has been widely cited as an example of problematic forensic pathology testimony.
对法医学的司法审查日益增加。这种审查针对专家意见的依据。法医病理学家必须明白,当他们发表意见时,必须有明确的潜在依据。有一个警示性案例,一名法医病理学家仅根据警方报告以及警方对嫌疑人讯问的音频和视频记录而非医学证据就死亡原因和方式提供的证词被认定为不可采信。有一组奇特且有别于其他的事实,但已被广泛引述为有问题的法医病理证词的一个例子。