Suppr超能文献

专家证人简史。

A Brief History of the Expert Witness.

作者信息

Milroy Christopher M

机构信息

The Ottawa Hospital - Anatomical Pathology.

出版信息

Acad Forensic Pathol. 2017 Dec;7(4):516-526. doi: 10.23907/2017.044. Epub 2017 Dec 1.

Abstract

Expert witnesses are now an accepted part of criminal and civil trials. The use of expert witnesses and the admissibility of their science has developed over the last 250 years, when the concept of allowing an expert witness to give opinion evidence on the facts of other witnesses was allowed by Lord Mansfield in the case of in 1782. This paper briefly describes how court procedures have changed over the centuries before opinion evidence was admitted and then traces the history of the expert witness in England, USA, and Canada, examining issues of admissibility and duties of the expert from the 18th century to the 21st century. The paper further describes the change in admissibility with US decisions in and and how they have affected courts in the UK and Canada. Also described are recent decisions in the UK on duties of experts and immunity from suit.

摘要

专家证人如今已成为刑事和民事审判中被认可的一部分。在过去的250年里,专家证人的使用及其科学证据的可采性不断发展。1782年,曼斯菲尔德勋爵在某案件中允许专家证人就其他证人的事实提供意见证据,这一概念自此开始出现。本文简要描述了在意见证据被采纳之前的几个世纪里法庭程序是如何变化的,接着追溯了英国、美国和加拿大专家证人的历史,审视了从18世纪到21世纪专家证据的可采性问题和专家的职责。本文还描述了美国某些判决所带来的可采性变化,以及这些变化如何影响了英国和加拿大的法院。此外,还介绍了英国近期关于专家职责和诉讼豁免权的判决。

相似文献

1
A Brief History of the Expert Witness.
Acad Forensic Pathol. 2017 Dec;7(4):516-526. doi: 10.23907/2017.044. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
2
3
Lessons from Canadian Courts for All Expert Witnesses.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2019 Aug;47(3):278-285. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.003838-19. Epub 2019 May 16.
4
Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2015 Sep-Dec;42-43:149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.08.020. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
6
Meeting a Forensic Podiatry Admissibility Challenge: A Daubert Case Study.
J Forensic Sci. 2016 May;61(3):833-841. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13037. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
7
8
The admissibility of offender profiling in courtroom: a review of legal issues and court opinions.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2010 May-Jun;33(3):184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.03.009. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
9
Admissibility of scientific evidence post-Daubert.
Health Phys. 2001 Dec;81(6):678-82. doi: 10.1097/00004032-200112000-00018.
10
Black Robes and White Coats: Daubert Standard and Medical and Legal Considerations for Medical Expert Witnesses.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 13;16(9):e69346. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69346. eCollection 2024 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
A scientist's take on scientific evidence in the courtroom.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 10;120(41):e2301839120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2301839120. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
2
Bibliometric evaluation of Forensic Science International as a scholarly journal within the subject category legal medicine.
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2023 Sep 16;7:100438. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100438. eCollection 2023.
3
Disclosing and Managing Non-Financial Conflicts of Interest in Scientific Publications.
Res Ethics. 2023 Apr;19(2):121-138. doi: 10.1177/17470161221148387. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
4
The use of image intensifier during scoliosis surgery: Perhaps not medico-legally obligatory; probably still the best practice.
N Am Spine Soc J. 2020 Sep 10;3:100027. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2020.100027. eCollection 2020 Oct.
5
Bases of Forensic Pathology Expert Testimony With Emphasis on .
Acad Forensic Pathol. 2021 Dec;11(4):185-195. doi: 10.1177/19253621211060961. Epub 2021 Dec 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验