• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗从业者对淋巴水肿的认知。

Healthcare Practitioners' Knowledge of Lymphedema.

作者信息

Yarmohammadi Hossein, Rooddehghan Amirhossein, Soltanipur Masood, Sarafraz Amirabbas, Mahdavi Anari Seyed Fatah

机构信息

Medical Students Research Committee, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Vasc Med. 2021 Dec 31;2021:3806150. doi: 10.1155/2021/3806150. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1155/2021/3806150
PMID:35003807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8741388/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Lymphedema is neglected in medical education, and a review on healthcare practitioners' (HCPs) knowledge is necessary to shed light on gaps and to provide evidence for establishing educational programs on lymphedema.

METHODS

This systematic review was performed based on the PRISMA guideline in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. There was no limitation on the type of lymphedema or HCPs. The quality assessment was performed based on QATSDD. Data regarding study characteristics, questionnaire context, and findings of the study were summarized from each article.

RESULTS

After the screening, 16 articles were included that 12 were cross-sectional, two were qualitative, and two were interventional pilot studies. Breast cancer and other cancer-related lymphedema, lymphatic filariasis, and podoconiosis were included, and the majority of articles were focused on primary HCPs. The overall knowledge was low and average in five and 11 articles, respectively, and prior education was a significant factor related to higher knowledge of lymphedema in two studies.

CONCLUSION

Structured education of lymphedema is needed to increase the knowledge of HCPs and to enhance their collaboration in multidisciplinary care teams. Improvement of HCPs' knowledge may lead to better outcomes of lymphedema patients' management which are neglected.

摘要

目的

淋巴水肿在医学教育中被忽视,有必要对医疗从业者(HCPs)的知识进行综述,以揭示差距,并为建立淋巴水肿教育项目提供证据。

方法

本系统综述依据PRISMA指南在PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和谷歌学术数据库中进行。对淋巴水肿类型或医疗从业者没有限制。基于QATSDD进行质量评估。从每篇文章中总结关于研究特征、问卷内容和研究结果的数据。

结果

筛选后纳入16篇文章,其中12篇为横断面研究,2篇为定性研究,2篇为干预性试点研究。包括乳腺癌及其他癌症相关淋巴水肿、淋巴丝虫病和足分支菌病,且大多数文章关注初级医疗从业者。在5篇和11篇文章中,总体知识水平分别较低和中等,两项研究中,先前教育是与淋巴水肿知识水平较高相关的一个重要因素。

结论

需要对淋巴水肿进行结构化教育,以增加医疗从业者的知识,并加强他们在多学科护理团队中的协作。提高医疗从业者的知识水平可能会改善被忽视的淋巴水肿患者的管理效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8854/8741388/79765b0d7b15/IJVM2021-3806150.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8854/8741388/79765b0d7b15/IJVM2021-3806150.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8854/8741388/79765b0d7b15/IJVM2021-3806150.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Healthcare Practitioners' Knowledge of Lymphedema.医疗从业者对淋巴水肿的认知。
Int J Vasc Med. 2021 Dec 31;2021:3806150. doi: 10.1155/2021/3806150. eCollection 2021.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Personal barriers to addressing intimate partner abuse: a qualitative meta-synthesis of healthcare practitioners' experiences.解决亲密伴侣虐待问题的个人障碍:医疗保健从业者经验的定性元分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 9;21(1):567. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06582-2.
4
Factors influencing practitioners' who do not participate in ethically complex, legally available care: scoping review.影响未参与伦理复杂、合法可提供的医疗保健的从业者的因素:范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Sep 28;22(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00703-6.
5
Association between healthcare practitioners' beliefs about statins and patients' beliefs and adherence.医护人员对他汀类药物的信念与患者的信念和依从性之间的关系。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Mar;87(3):1082-1088. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14467. Epub 2020 Jul 26.
6
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
7
Evaluating communication partner training in healthcare centres: Understanding the mechanisms of behaviour change.评估医疗中心的沟通伙伴培训:理解行为改变的机制。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 Nov;56(6):1190-1203. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12659. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
8
Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Surgical vs Nonsurgical Treatment of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: A Systematic Review.手术与非手术治疗乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的生活质量结局:系统评价。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jun 1;155(6):513-519. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0230.
9
Living with leg lymphedema: developing a novel model of quality lymphedema care for cancer survivors.下肢淋巴水肿患者的生活:为癌症幸存者制定新型优质淋巴水肿护理模式。
J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Feb;15(1):140-150. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00919-2. Epub 2020 Jul 26.
10
Delayed Breast Reconstruction on Patients With Upper Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Pooled Analysis.上肢淋巴水肿患者的延迟乳房重建:文献系统评价与汇总分析
Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Dec;81(6):730-735. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001542.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging the Knowledge Gap: Assessing Healthcare Professionals' Learning Outcomes After Establishing a Lymphedema Management Conference.弥合知识差距:评估在举办淋巴水肿管理会议后医疗保健专业人员的学习成果。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Jul 18;13(7):e6968. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006968. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Risk factors for severity of breast cancer-related lymphedema.乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿严重程度的危险因素。
Radiat Oncol. 2025 May 20;20(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13014-025-02663-2.
3
Meta-analysis on effects of lymphatic drainage techniques in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome.

本文引用的文献

1
Knowledge, attitudes and practices of health professionals towards people living with lymphoedema caused by lymphatic filariasis, podoconiosis and leprosy in northern Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚北部卫生专业人员对淋巴丝虫病、 Podoconiosis 和麻风病引起的淋巴水肿患者的知识、态度和实践。
Int Health. 2022 Sep 7;14(5):530-536. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihab067.
2
Lymphedema rehabilitation: Provision and practice patterns among service providers: National survey.淋巴水肿康复:服务提供者的提供和实践模式:全国调查。
Int Wound J. 2022 Feb;19(2):339-350. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13634. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
3
The education needs of health professionals conservatively managing genital oedema: UK survey findings.
淋巴引流技术在腕管综合征治疗中效果的荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 May 20;20(1):491. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05887-w.
4
Objective Assessment of the Cardiorespiratory Fitness Among Individuals With Lymphedema and Lipedema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.淋巴水肿和脂肪性水肿患者心肺适能的客观评估:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Vasc Med. 2025 Feb 13;2025:8627520. doi: 10.1155/ijvm/8627520. eCollection 2025.
5
Lymphatic complication in open venous harvesting versus endoscopic venous harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.开放静脉采集与内镜静脉采集的淋巴并发症:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 May;73(5):297-311. doi: 10.1007/s11748-025-02126-1. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
6
Post-operative care for patients following surgical treatment of lymphedema.术后护理:淋巴水肿手术后患者的护理。
Med Oncol. 2024 Oct 23;41(11):296. doi: 10.1007/s12032-024-02420-7.
7
Lymphedema after saphenous harvesting for coronary artery bypass surgery: case report and literature review.大隐静脉取用于冠状动脉旁路移植术后的淋巴水肿:病例报告和文献复习。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Jan 12;24(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03712-6.
8
The Lymphatic System, Lymphoedema, and Medical Curricula-Survey of Australian Medical Graduates.淋巴系统、淋巴水肿与医学课程——澳大利亚医学毕业生调查
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 16;14(24):6219. doi: 10.3390/cancers14246219.
保守治疗生殖器水肿的卫生专业人员的教育需求:英国调查结果。
Br J Nurs. 2021 May 13;30(9):S18-S26. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2021.30.9.S18.
4
Knowledge, attitude, practice and associated factors of health professionals towards podoconiosis in Gamo zone, Ethiopia, 2019.2019 年,埃塞俄比亚甘莫地区卫生专业人员对 Podoconiosis 的知识、态度、实践及相关因素。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2021 Apr 14;14(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13047-021-00464-w.
5
From Bench to Bedside: The Role of a Multidisciplinary Approach to Treating Patients with Lymphedema.从基础到临床:多学科方法治疗淋巴水肿患者的作用。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2021 Feb;19(1):11-16. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2020.0118. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
6
The St George's Classification Algorithm of Primary Lymphatic Anomalies.圣乔治原发性淋巴畸形分类算法。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2021 Feb;19(1):25-30. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2020.0104. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
7
Herbs as old potential treatments for lymphedema management: A systematic review.草药作为治疗淋巴水肿的潜在老方法:系统评价。
Complement Ther Med. 2020 Dec;55:102615. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102615. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
8
An interview study to determine the experiences of cellulitis diagnosis amongst health care professionals in the UK.一项访谈研究,旨在确定英国医疗保健专业人员对蜂窝织炎诊断的体验。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 14;10(10):e034692. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034692.
9
Podoconiosis in Rwanda: Knowledge, attitudes and practices among health professionals and environmental officers.卢旺达的 Podoconiosis:卫生专业人员和环境官员的知识、态度和实践。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Oct 7;14(10):e0008740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008740. eCollection 2020 Oct.
10
The Role of Patient Awareness and Knowledge in Developing Secondary Lymphedema after Breast and Gynecologic Cancer Surgery.患者意识和知识在乳腺癌和妇科癌症手术后继发淋巴水肿中的作用。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2020 Dec;18(6):526-533. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2020.0059. Epub 2020 Oct 7.