Yi Jie, Wang Nan, Wu Jie, Tang Yueming, Zhang Jingjia, Zhu Lingxiang, Rui Xiao, Guo Yong, Xu Yingchun
State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Beijing Key Laboratory for Mechanisms Research and Precision Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Diseases, Beijing, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 22;8:761788. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.761788. eCollection 2021.
is a human-specific opportunistic fungus that causes Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP), a life-threatening opportunistic lung infection that affects immunocompromised patients. colonization may be linked to the transmission of the infection. The detection of in immunocompromised patients is thus especially important. The low fungal load and the presence of PCR inhibitors limit the usefulness of quantitative PCR (qPCR) for accurate absolute quantification of in specimens. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), however, presents a methodology that allows higher sensitivity and accuracy. Here, we developed a ddPCR method for detecting DNA in respiratory specimens, and evaluated its sensitivity against qPCR. One bronchoalveolar fluid (BALF) sample each was collected from 82 patients with potential PCP to test the presence of DNA using both ddPCR and qPCR, and samples with inconsistent results between the two methods were further tested by metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS). In addition, 37 sputum samples from 16 patients diagnosed with PCP, as well as continuous respiratory tract specimens from nine patients with PCP and treated with sulfonamides, were also collected for DNA testing using both ddPCR and qPCR. ddPCR and qPCR gave the same results for 95.12% (78/82) of the BALF samples. The remaining four specimens tested positive using ddPCR but negative using qPCR, and they were found to be positive by mNGS. Detection results of 78.37% (29/37) sputum samples were consistent between ddPCR and qPCR, while the other eight samples tested positive using ddPCR but negative using qPCR. The load of patients with PCP decreased to undetectable levels after treatment according to qPCR, but was still detectable using ddPCR. ddPCR was more sensitive than qPCR, especially at detecting low-pathogen-load . Thus, ddPCR represents a useful, viable, and reliable alternative to qPCR in testing in patients with immunodeficiency.
是一种人类特有的机会性真菌,可引起肺孢子菌肺炎(PCP),这是一种危及生命的机会性肺部感染,影响免疫功能低下的患者。定植可能与感染的传播有关。因此,在免疫功能低下的患者中检测尤为重要。真菌载量低和PCR抑制剂的存在限制了定量PCR(qPCR)对标本中进行准确绝对定量的实用性。然而,液滴数字PCR(ddPCR)提供了一种具有更高灵敏度和准确性的方法。在这里,我们开发了一种用于检测呼吸道标本中DNA的ddPCR方法,并评估了其相对于qPCR的灵敏度。从82例疑似PCP患者中各采集一份支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)样本,使用ddPCR和qPCR检测DNA的存在,两种方法结果不一致的样本进一步通过宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)进行检测。此外,还收集了16例确诊为PCP患者的37份痰样本,以及9例接受磺胺类药物治疗的PCP患者的连续呼吸道标本,使用ddPCR和qPCR进行DNA检测。对于95.12%(78/82)的BALF样本,ddPCR和qPCR结果相同。其余4份标本ddPCR检测为阳性而qPCR检测为阴性,mNGS检测发现它们为阳性。ddPCR和qPCR对78.37%(29/37)的痰样本检测结果一致,另外8份样本ddPCR检测为阳性而qPCR检测为阴性。根据qPCR检测,PCP患者治疗后负荷降至不可检测水平,但使用ddPCR仍可检测到。ddPCR比qPCR更灵敏,尤其是在检测低病原体载量时。因此,在免疫缺陷患者的检测中,ddPCR是qPCR一种有用、可行且可靠的替代方法。