Egenvall Agneta, Roepstorff Lars, Peterson Michael, Lundholm Marcus, Hernlund Elin
Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Husbandry, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Dec 23;8:798910. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.798910. eCollection 2021.
Horses in equestrian sports are commonly trained in arenas with prepared footing. Information on the number and variants of such arenas is generally unknown. This paper provides an overview of the primary construction types of riding surfaces in Sweden including details on composition, constructions principles, usage frequency, maintenance, and cost of operation as well as to investigate rider perception of the ideal arena properties using a large population of riders. Data on 656 equestrian surfaces in Sweden obtained up to 2014 are presented, of which 373 were outdoor and 283 were indoor arenas. Dressage and show-jumping were the main disciplines conducted in the arenas. Sand-mineral arenas were most common outdoors and sand-woodchips arenas most common indoors, followed by sand-fibre arenas and even fewer synthetic arenas. Comparing the three most common arena types, dragging was most often done on sand-woodchips and sand-fibre arenas. Harrowing was less often done on sand-mineral arenas compared to sand-woodchips and sand-fibre arenas. Combining dragging, harrowing, deep harrowing, and rolling, arenas with higher usage were maintained more frequently, compared to those used less frequently. It was commonly claimed that the top-layer needs renovation every other-4th year or every 5th to 10th year. Few respondents allocated more than 10,000 SEK in yearly maintenance costs, with the exception for sand-woodchips and sand-fibre arenas followed by synthetic arenas. The shortest duration perceived between required renovations was found for sand-woodchips top-layer arenas. Ideal surface properties were evaluated by 3,158 riders. Dressage and show-jumping riders differed somewhat regarding ideal spans of functional arena properties: for impact firmness, responsiveness, and grip. The current study likely included well-utilised arenas, compared to those less well-utilised. The resources necessary to keep an arena consistent over time seemed underestimated. Knowledge of maintenance and priorities for arenas are important to users and arenas managers, be they construction companies or arena managers in order to maximise the outcome of efforts for arena improvement and optimise locomotor health for horses that use them. Further, many arenas were new and research into organic arena management is important, especially if equestrians continue to build and renew arena surfaces.
马术运动中的马匹通常在有准备好的地面的竞技场内训练。关于此类竞技场的数量和变体的信息通常并不为人所知。本文概述了瑞典骑马场地的主要建设类型,包括其组成、建设原则、使用频率、维护以及运营成本的详细信息,并通过大量骑手调查他们对理想竞技场属性的看法。文中呈现了截至2014年在瑞典获取的656个马术场地的数据,其中373个是室外竞技场,283个是室内竞技场。盛装舞步和场地障碍赛是竞技场内进行的主要项目。沙 - 矿物质场地在室外最为常见,沙 - 木屑场地在室内最为常见,其次是沙 - 纤维场地,合成场地则更少。比较三种最常见的场地类型,拖平操作在沙 - 木屑和沙 - 纤维场地上最为频繁。与沙 - 木屑和沙 - 纤维场地相比,沙 - 矿物质场地进行耙地操作的频率较低。综合拖平、耙地、深耕和滚压操作来看,使用频率较高的场地比使用频率较低的场地维护更为频繁。人们普遍认为顶层每隔4年或每5至10年需要翻新。除了沙 - 木屑和沙 - 纤维场地以及合成场地外,很少有受访者每年的维护成本超过10,000瑞典克朗。沙 - 木屑顶层场地被认为需要翻新的间隔时间最短。3158名骑手对理想的场地属性进行了评估。盛装舞步和场地障碍赛骑手在理想的功能性场地属性范围方面存在一些差异:如冲击硬度、反应能力和抓地力。与那些使用不太频繁的场地相比,本研究可能涵盖了使用良好的竞技场。随着时间推移保持一个场地一致性所需的资源似乎被低估了。对于场地使用者和场地管理者(无论是建筑公司还是竞技场管理者)来说,了解场地维护和优先级很重要,以便最大限度地提高改善场地的努力成果,并优化使用这些场地的马匹的运动健康。此外,许多场地是新建的,对有机场地管理的研究很重要,特别是如果马术从业者继续建造和翻新场地表面的话。