Tranquille C A, Walker V A, Hernlund E, Egenvall A, Roepstorff L, Peterson M L, Murray R C
Centre for Equine Studies, Animal Health Trust, Lanwades Park, Kentford, Newmarket, Suffolk CB8 7UU, United Kingdom.
Centre for Equine Studies, Animal Health Trust, Lanwades Park, Kentford, Newmarket, Suffolk CB8 7UU, United Kingdom.
Vet J. 2015 Jan;203(1):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.10.027. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
A recent epidemiological study identified various aspects of arena surfaces and arena surface maintenance that were related to risk of injury in horses and that arena maintenance is important in reducing injury risk. However, there has been little research into how properties of arena surfaces change with harrowing. This study aimed to compare the properties of different arena surface types pre- and post-harrowing. The Orono Biomechanical Surface Tester fitted with accelerometers and a single- and a three-axis load cell was used to test 11 arenas with two different surfaces types, sand with rubber (SR) and waxed-sand with fibre (WSF). Three drop tests were carried out at 10 standardised locations on each arena. Mixed models were created to assess the effect of surface type, pre- or post-harrowing, and drop number on the properties of the surface, including maximum horizontal deceleration, maximum vertical deceleration, maximum vertical load and maximum horizontal load. Post-harrowing, none of the parameters were altered significantly on SR. On WSF, maximum vertical deceleration and maximum vertical load significantly decreased post-harrowing. The differences in the effects of superficial harrowing on SR and WSF could be attributed to the different compositions and sizes of the surface material. The results suggest that different maintenance techniques may be more suitable for different surface types and that the effects of superficial harrowing are short-lived due to the rapid re-compaction of the surface with repeated drops on WSF. Further work is required to determine the effects of other maintenance techniques, and on other surface types.
最近的一项流行病学研究确定了竞技场地表面及场地表面维护的各个方面,这些方面与马匹受伤风险相关,且场地维护对于降低受伤风险很重要。然而,关于竞技场地表面特性如何随耙地而变化的研究很少。本研究旨在比较不同类型竞技场地表面在耙地前后的特性。使用配备加速度计以及单轴和三轴称重传感器的奥罗诺生物力学表面测试仪,对11个具有两种不同表面类型的场地进行测试,这两种表面类型分别是橡胶砂(SR)和纤维蜡砂(WSF)。在每个场地上的10个标准化位置进行了三次跌落测试。创建混合模型以评估表面类型、耙地前后以及跌落次数对表面特性的影响,这些特性包括最大水平减速度、最大垂直减速度、最大垂直载荷和最大水平载荷。耙地后,SR上的所有参数均未显著改变。在WSF上,耙地后最大垂直减速度和最大垂直载荷显著降低。浅层耙地对SR和WSF影响的差异可能归因于表面材料的不同成分和尺寸。结果表明,不同的维护技术可能更适用于不同的表面类型,并且由于WSF表面在反复跌落时会迅速重新压实,浅层耙地的效果是短暂的。需要进一步开展工作以确定其他维护技术以及其他表面类型的影响。