• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估用于预测重症监护病房非计划入院情况的数字系统:一种混合方法。

Evaluation of a digital system to predict unplanned admissions to the intensive care unit: A mixed-methods approach.

作者信息

Malycha James, Redfern Oliver, Pimentel Marco, Ludbrook Guy, Young Duncan, Watkinson Peter

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Resusc Plus. 2021 Dec 23;9:100193. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100193. eCollection 2022 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100193
PMID:35005662
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8715371/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We have developed the Hospital Alerting Via Electronic Noticeboard (HAVEN) which aims to identify hospitalised patients most at risk of reversible deterioration. HAVEN combines patients' vital-sign measurements with laboratory results, demographics and comorbidities using a machine learnt algorithm.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify variables or concepts that could improve HAVEN predictive performance.

METHODS

This was an embedded, mixed methods study. Eligible patients with the five highest HAVEN scores in the hospital (i.e., 'HAVEN Top 5') had their medical identification details recorded. We conducted a structured medical note review on these patients 48 hours post their identifiers being recorded. Methods of constant comparison were used during data collection and to analyse patient data.

RESULTS

The 129 patients not admitted to ICU then underwent constant comparison review, which produced three main groups. Group 1 were patients referred to specialist services (n = 37). Group 2 responded to ward-based treatment, (n = 38). Group 3 were frail and had documented treatment limitations (n = 47).

CONCLUSIONS

Digital-only validation methods code the cohort not admitted to ICU as 'falsely positive' in sensitivity analyses however this approach limits the evaluation of model performance. Our study suggested that coding for patients referred to other specialist teams, those with treatment limitations in place, along with those who are deteriorating but then respond to ward-based therapies, would give a more accurate measure of the value of the scores, especially in relation to cost-effectiveness of resource utilisation.

摘要

背景

我们开发了通过电子公告栏进行医院警报(HAVEN)系统,旨在识别住院患者中最有可能出现可逆性病情恶化的患者。HAVEN系统使用机器学习算法,将患者的生命体征测量结果与实验室检查结果、人口统计学数据和合并症相结合。

目的

本研究的目的是识别可提高HAVEN预测性能的变量或概念。

方法

这是一项嵌入式混合方法研究。记录了医院中HAVEN评分最高的五名合格患者(即“HAVEN前五名”)的医疗识别详细信息。在记录这些患者的标识符48小时后,我们对他们的病历进行了结构化审查。在数据收集和分析患者数据时使用了持续比较法。

结果

129名未入住重症监护病房的患者随后接受了持续比较审查,结果产生了三个主要组。第一组是转诊至专科服务的患者(n = 37)。第二组对基于病房的治疗有反应(n = 38)。第三组身体虚弱且有记录在案的治疗限制(n = 47)。

结论

在敏感性分析中,仅采用数字验证方法会将未入住重症监护病房的队列编码为“假阳性”,然而这种方法限制了对模型性能的评估。我们的研究表明,对转诊至其他专科团队的患者、有治疗限制的患者以及病情恶化但随后对基于病房的治疗有反应的患者进行编码,将能更准确地衡量评分的价值,尤其是在资源利用的成本效益方面。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a digital system to predict unplanned admissions to the intensive care unit: A mixed-methods approach.评估用于预测重症监护病房非计划入院情况的数字系统:一种混合方法。
Resusc Plus. 2021 Dec 23;9:100193. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100193. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Testing a digital system that ranks the risk of unplanned intensive care unit admission in all ward patients: protocol for a prospective observational cohort study.测试一种数字系统,对所有病房患者的非计划性重症监护病房入院风险进行分级:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 11;9(9):e032429. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032429.
3
Detecting Deteriorating Patients in the Hospital: Development and Validation of a Novel Scoring System.在医院中检测病情恶化的患者:一种新型评分系统的开发和验证。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jul 1;204(1):44-52. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202007-2700OC.
4
Early detection of impending physiologic deterioration among patients who are not in intensive care: development of predictive models using data from an automated electronic medical record.非重症监护患者生理恶化即将发生的早期检测:使用自动化电子病历数据开发预测模型。
J Hosp Med. 2012 May-Jun;7(5):388-95. doi: 10.1002/jhm.1929. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
5
Surgical intensive care - current and future challenges?外科重症监护——当前及未来的挑战?
Qatar Med J. 2020 Jan 13;2019(2):3. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.3. eCollection 2019.
6
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration of Patients in General Wards Is Mostly Caused by Human Related Monitoring Failures: A Root Cause Analysis of Unplanned ICU Admissions.普通病房患者病情恶化的延迟识别主要是由与人为相关的监测失误导致的:对非计划入住重症监护病房的根本原因分析
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 18;11(8):e0161393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161393. eCollection 2016.
7
Development and Validation of Unplanned Extubation Prediction Models Using Intensive Care Unit Data: Retrospective, Comparative, Machine Learning Study.基于 ICU 数据的非计划性拔管预测模型的开发和验证:回顾性、对比、机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 11;23(8):e23508. doi: 10.2196/23508.
8
Towards development of alert thresholds for clinical deterioration using continuous predictive analytics monitoring.利用连续预测分析监测开发临床恶化预警阈值。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Aug;34(4):797-804. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00361-5. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
9
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
10
Development and validation of an electronic medical record-based alert score for detection of inpatient deterioration outside the ICU.基于电子病历的住院患者重症监护病房外病情恶化警报评分的开发与验证
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Dec;64:10-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Protocol describing a systematic review and mixed methods consensus process to define the deteriorated ward patient.描述系统评价和混合方法共识过程的方案,以定义恶化病房患者。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 19;12(9):e057614. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057614.

本文引用的文献

1
External Validation of a Widely Implemented Proprietary Sepsis Prediction Model in Hospitalized Patients.在住院患者中验证广泛实施的专有脓毒症预测模型的外部有效性。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Aug 1;181(8):1065-1070. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2626.
2
Automated Identification of Adults at Risk for In-Hospital Clinical Deterioration.自动化识别住院临床恶化风险成人。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 12;383(20):1951-1960. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2001090.
3
Implementing a system for the real-time risk assessment of patients considered for intensive care.
实施一个用于对考虑进入重症监护病房的患者进行实时风险评估的系统。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jul 16;20(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01176-0.
4
Development and validation of early warning score system: A systematic literature review.早期预警评分系统的开发与验证:一项系统文献综述。
J Biomed Inform. 2020 May;105:103410. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103410. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
5
Development and Reporting of Prediction Models: Guidance for Authors From Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care Journals.预测模型的制定和报告:呼吸、睡眠和危重病期刊编辑给作者的指南。
Crit Care Med. 2020 May;48(5):623-633. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004246.
6
Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of an In-Hospital Optimized Early Warning Score for Patient Deterioration.针对患者病情恶化的院内优化早期预警评分的开发、实施与评估
MDM Policy Pract. 2020 Jan 10;5(1):2381468319899663. doi: 10.1177/2381468319899663. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun.
7
Validation of Early Warning Scores at Two Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals.在两家长期急性护理医院验证早期预警评分。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Dec;47(12):e962-e965. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004026.
8
Testing a digital system that ranks the risk of unplanned intensive care unit admission in all ward patients: protocol for a prospective observational cohort study.测试一种数字系统,对所有病房患者的非计划性重症监护病房入院风险进行分级:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 11;9(9):e032429. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032429.
9
Patient centred variables with univariate associations with unplanned ICU admission: a systematic review.以患者为中心的变量与非计划性 ICU 入院的单变量相关性:系统综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 May 15;19(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0820-1.
10
Comparison of variable selection methods for clinical predictive modeling.比较临床预测建模中的变量选择方法。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Aug;116:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 21.