• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在医院中检测病情恶化的患者:一种新型评分系统的开发和验证。

Detecting Deteriorating Patients in the Hospital: Development and Validation of a Novel Scoring System.

机构信息

Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, and.

Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jul 1;204(1):44-52. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202007-2700OC.

DOI:10.1164/rccm.202007-2700OC
PMID:33525997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8437126/
Abstract

Late recognition of patient deterioration in hospital is associated with worse outcomes, including higher mortality. Despite the widespread introduction of early warning score (EWS) systems and electronic health records, deterioration still goes unrecognized. To develop and externally validate a Hospital- wide Alerting via Electronic Noticeboard (HAVEN) system to identify hospitalized patients at risk of reversible deterioration. This was a retrospective cohort study of patients 16 years of age or above admitted to four UK hospitals. The primary outcome was cardiac arrest or unplanned admission to the ICU. We used patient data (vital signs, laboratory tests, comorbidities, and frailty) from one hospital to train a machine-learning model (gradient boosting trees). We internally and externally validated the model and compared its performance with existing scoring systems (including the National EWS, laboratory-based acute physiology score, and electronic cardiac arrest risk triage score). We developed the HAVEN model using 230,415 patient admissions to a single hospital. We validated HAVEN on 266,295 admissions to four hospitals. HAVEN showed substantially higher discrimination (c-statistic, 0.901 [95% confidence interval, 0.898-0.903]) for the primary outcome within 24 hours of each measurement than other published scoring systems (which range from 0.700 [0.696-0.704] to 0.863 [0.860-0.865]). With a precision of 10%, HAVEN was able to identify 42% of cardiac arrests or unplanned ICU admissions with a lead time of up to 48 hours in advance, compared with 22% by the next best system. The HAVEN machine-learning algorithm for early identification of in-hospital deterioration significantly outperforms other published scores such as the National EWS.

摘要

医院内患者病情恶化的识别延迟与较差的预后相关,包括更高的死亡率。尽管广泛引入了早期预警评分(EWS)系统和电子健康记录,病情恶化仍然未被识别。为了开发和外部验证一种通过电子布告栏进行全院警报(HAVEN)系统,以识别有可逆性恶化风险的住院患者。这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了年龄在 16 岁及以上的在四家英国医院住院的患者。主要结局是心脏骤停或计划外转入 ICU。我们使用一家医院的患者数据(生命体征、实验室检查、合并症和虚弱)来训练机器学习模型(梯度提升树)。我们对模型进行了内部和外部验证,并将其性能与现有的评分系统(包括国家 EWS、基于实验室的急性生理学评分和电子心脏骤停风险分诊评分)进行了比较。我们使用单一医院的 230415 例患者入院数据开发了 HAVEN 模型。我们在四家医院的 266295 例患者入院数据中验证了 HAVEN。HAVEN 在每个测量点后 24 小时内对主要结局的预测能力明显高于其他已发表的评分系统(范围为 0.700 [0.696-0.704]至 0.863 [0.860-0.865]),其判别能力更高(C 统计量为 0.901 [0.898-0.903])。在精度为 10%的情况下,HAVEN 能够在提前 48 小时内识别出 42%的心脏骤停或计划外 ICU 入院,而最佳的下一个系统只能识别 22%。用于早期识别院内恶化的 HAVEN 机器学习算法明显优于其他已发表的评分系统,如国家 EWS。

相似文献

1
Detecting Deteriorating Patients in the Hospital: Development and Validation of a Novel Scoring System.在医院中检测病情恶化的患者:一种新型评分系统的开发和验证。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jul 1;204(1):44-52. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202007-2700OC.
2
Testing a digital system that ranks the risk of unplanned intensive care unit admission in all ward patients: protocol for a prospective observational cohort study.测试一种数字系统,对所有病房患者的非计划性重症监护病房入院风险进行分级:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 11;9(9):e032429. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032429.
3
Early warning score adjusted for age to predict the composite outcome of mortality, cardiac arrest or unplanned intensive care unit admission using observational vital-sign data: a multicentre development and validation.使用观察到的生命体征数据调整年龄的早期预警评分,以预测死亡率、心脏骤停或非计划入住重症监护病房的综合结局:一项多中心开发与验证研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 19;9(11):e033301. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033301.
4
Performance of machine learning versus the national early warning score for predicting patient deterioration risk: a single-site study of emergency admissions.机器学习与国家早期预警评分在预测患者病情恶化风险方面的表现:一项关于急诊入院的单中心研究。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024 Dec 4;31(1):e101088. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101088.
5
Multicenter Development and Prospective Validation of eCARTv5: A Gradient-Boosted Machine-Learning Early Warning Score.eCARTv5的多中心开发与前瞻性验证:一种梯度提升机器学习早期预警评分
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Mar 26;7(4):e1232. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001232. eCollection 2025 Apr 1.
6
Effect of Digital Early Warning Scores on Hospital Vital Sign Observation Protocol Adherence: Stepped-Wedge Evaluation.数字化早期预警评分对医院生命体征观察协议依从性的影响:逐步评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 20;26:e46691. doi: 10.2196/46691.
7
Prediction of Clinical Deterioration in Hospitalized Adult Patients with Hematologic Malignancies Using a Neural Network Model.使用神经网络模型预测住院血液系统恶性肿瘤成年患者的临床病情恶化
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 17;11(8):e0161401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161401. eCollection 2016.
8
A Real-Time Early Warning System for Monitoring Inpatient Mortality Risk: Prospective Study Using Electronic Medical Record Data.用于监测住院患者死亡风险的实时预警系统:使用电子病历数据的前瞻性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 5;21(7):e13719. doi: 10.2196/13719.
9
Effectiveness of Remote Patient Monitoring Equipped With an Early Warning System in Tertiary Care Hospital Wards: Retrospective Cohort Study.配备早期预警系统的远程患者监测在三级医院病房中的有效性:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 15;27:e56463. doi: 10.2196/56463.
10
Performance of 21 Early Warning System scores in predicting in-hospital deterioration among undifferentiated admitted patients managed by ambulance services.21 种早期预警系统评分在预测由救护车服务管理的未明确诊断的入院患者住院期间恶化的表现。
Emerg Med J. 2024 Jul 22;41(8):481-487. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213708.

引用本文的文献

1
A machine learning model for predicting short-term outcomes after rapid response system activation.一种用于预测快速反应系统启动后短期结果的机器学习模型。
Acute Med Surg. 2025 Aug 12;12(1):e70083. doi: 10.1002/ams2.70083. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Predicting patient deterioration with physiological data using AI: systematic review protocol.使用人工智能通过生理数据预测患者病情恶化:系统评价方案
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025 Aug 5;32(1):e101417. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101417.
3
AI-Powered early warning systems for clinical deterioration significantly improve patient outcomes: a meta-analysis.人工智能驱动的临床病情恶化早期预警系统显著改善患者预后:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03048-x.
4
Multicenter Development and Prospective Validation of eCARTv5: A Gradient-Boosted Machine-Learning Early Warning Score.eCARTv5的多中心开发与前瞻性验证:一种梯度提升机器学习早期预警评分
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Mar 26;7(4):e1232. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001232. eCollection 2025 Apr 1.
5
Unlocking opportunities to transform patient care: an expert insight on limitations and opportunities in patient monitoring.开启改变患者护理的机遇:关于患者监测局限性与机遇的专家见解
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2025 Feb 22;13(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40635-025-00733-z.
6
Factors underpinning the performance of implemented artificial intelligence-based patient deterioration prediction systems: reasons for selection and implications for hospitals and researchers.已实施的基于人工智能的患者病情恶化预测系统性能的支撑因素:选择原因及对医院和研究人员的启示
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Mar 1;32(3):492-509. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae321.
7
The early warning paradox.早期预警悖论。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Feb 3;8(1):81. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01408-x.
8
Mortality and Length of Stay Implications of Deterioration-Associated Transfer to the Intensive Care Unit over Different Time Frames.不同时间框架下与病情恶化相关的转入重症监护病房对死亡率和住院时间的影响。
Health Serv Insights. 2025 Jan 18;18:11786329241312877. doi: 10.1177/11786329241312877. eCollection 2025.
9
NEWS-2 Accuracy in Predicting Mortality and Severe Morbidity Among Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.新闻2:预测住院COVID-19患者死亡率和严重发病率的准确性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 31;13(21):6558. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216558.
10
New horizons in hospital-associated deconditioning: a global condition of body and mind.医院相关性失能的新视野:身心的全球性状况。
Age Ageing. 2024 Nov 1;53(11). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae241.

本文引用的文献

1
Early warning scores for detecting deterioration in adult hospital patients: systematic review and critical appraisal of methodology.成人住院患者病情恶化预警评分的研究:系统评价与方法学的严格评价。
BMJ. 2020 May 20;369:m1501. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1501.
2
Action-Informed Artificial Intelligence-Matching the Algorithm to the Problem.行动导向型人工智能——使算法与问题相匹配
JAMA. 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2141-2142. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5035.
3
Validation and Utility Testing of Clinical Prediction Models: Time to Change the Approach.临床预测模型的验证与效用测试:是时候改变方法了。
JAMA. 2020 Jul 21;324(3):235-236. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1230.
4
What Do We Do After the Pilot Is Done? Implementation of a Hospital Early Warning System at Scale.试点完成后我们要做什么?大规模实施医院早期预警系统。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 Apr;46(4):207-216. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.01.003. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
5
Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of an In-Hospital Optimized Early Warning Score for Patient Deterioration.针对患者病情恶化的院内优化早期预警评分的开发、实施与评估
MDM Policy Pract. 2020 Jan 10;5(1):2381468319899663. doi: 10.1177/2381468319899663. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun.
6
Comparing the predictive ability of a commercial artificial intelligence early warning system with physician judgement for clinical deterioration in hospitalised general internal medicine patients: a prospective observational study.比较商业人工智能预警系统与医生判断对住院普通内科患者临床病情恶化的预测能力:一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 10;9(10):e032187. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032187.
7
Do no harm: a roadmap for responsible machine learning for health care.《医疗保健负责任机器学习的路线图:不造成伤害》。
Nat Med. 2019 Sep;25(9):1337-1340. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0548-6. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
8
A clinically applicable approach to continuous prediction of future acute kidney injury.一种临床适用的急性肾损伤未来发生的连续预测方法。
Nature. 2019 Aug;572(7767):116-119. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1390-1. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
9
Patient centred variables with univariate associations with unplanned ICU admission: a systematic review.以患者为中心的变量与非计划性 ICU 入院的单变量相关性:系统综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 May 15;19(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0820-1.
10
Validating the Electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage (eCART) Score for Risk Stratification of Surgical Inpatients in the Postoperative Setting: Retrospective Cohort Study.验证电子心脏骤停风险分诊(eCART)评分在术后环境下对手术住院患者进行风险分层的有效性:回顾性队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jun;269(6):1059-1063. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002665.