• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国军、民人群紧急剖宫产可及性的地理空间分析

Geospatial Analysis of Access to Emergency Cesarean Delivery for Military and Civilian Populations in the US.

机构信息

Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2142835. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42835.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42835
PMID:35006244
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8749478/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Many women in the US, particularly those living in rural areas, have limited access to obstetric care. Military-civilian partnership could improve access to obstetric care and benefit military personnel, their civilian dependents, and the civilian population as a whole.

OBJECTIVE

To identify medical facilities within military and civilian geographic areas that present opportunities for military-civilian partnership in obstetric care and to assess whether civilian use of military medical treatment facilities (MTFs) could improve access to emergency cesarean delivery care in the US.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This geospatial epidemiological population-based cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2020 to March 2021. ArcGIS Pro software, version 2.7 (Esri), was used to assess population coverage for TRICARE (military insurance) beneficiaries and civilian populations and to estimate 30-minute travel time to 2392 total military and civilian medical facilities that were capable of providing emergency cesarean delivery care in the continental US. Data on health insurance coverage for TRICARE beneficiaries and their civilian dependents per county were obtained from the American Community Survey tables available through ArcGIS Pro software. Demographic characteristics of the general population were obtained from the 2020 key demographic indicators published by Esri. Race and ethnicity were not examined because the data used for this study were aggregated and did not include further categorization by race or ethnicity.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Population coverage rates (measured in percentages) within 30-minute catchment areas, defined as areas that were within a 30-minute travel time to a medical facility capable of providing emergency cesarean delivery care.

RESULTS

A total of 29 MTFs and 2363 civilian hospitals capable of providing emergency cesarean delivery were identified across the contiguous US. Overall, an estimated 167 759 762 women (3 640 000 TRICARE beneficiaries and 164 119 762 civilians) were included in these service areas. The analysis identified 17 of 29 MTFs (58.6%) capable of providing emergency cesarean delivery care that were located within 30-minute catchment areas. Of those, 3 MTFs were the only facilities capable of providing emergency cesarean delivery care within a 30-minute travel time in those regions, and 14 additional MTFs had catchment areas partially overlapping with civilian hospitals that also covered areas without alternative access to emergency cesarean delivery. Expanded use of these 14 MTFs could enhance access to emergency cesarean delivery care not otherwise covered by current civilian hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, 58.6% of MTFs capable of providing emergency cesarean delivery care were located in areas with the potential to improve access to obstetric care within a 30-minute travel time. Maintenance of MTFs in these important access regions could be prioritized in the context of restructuring MTFs. This prioritization has the potential to improve access to emergency cesarean delivery care for underserved civilian populations in the US, particularly among those living in rural areas.

摘要

重要性

美国许多女性,特别是居住在农村地区的女性,获得产科护理的机会有限。军民合作可以改善获得产科护理的机会,并使军事人员、其平民家属以及整个平民群体受益。

目的

确定军事和民用地理区域内的医疗设施,这些设施为产科护理中的军民合作提供了机会,并评估民用使用军事医疗设施(MTF)是否可以改善美国紧急剖腹产护理的可及性。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项基于人群的地理空间流行病学横截面研究,于 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 3 月进行。ArcGIS Pro 软件,版本 2.7(Esri)用于评估 TRICARE(军事保险)受益人和平民人口的覆盖范围,并估计在美国大陆 2392 家能够提供紧急剖腹产护理的军事和民用医疗设施的 30 分钟旅行时间。每个县 TRICARE 受益人和其平民家属的医疗保险覆盖数据是通过 ArcGIS Pro 软件获得的。一般人口的人口统计特征是从 Esri 发布的 2020 年关键人口指标中获得的。由于用于本研究的数据是汇总的,并且没有进一步按种族或族裔进行分类,因此未检查种族和族裔。

主要结果和措施

30 分钟集水区内的人口覆盖率(以百分比表示),定义为能够提供紧急剖腹产护理的医疗设施 30 分钟旅行时间内的区域。

结果

在美国大陆各地共确定了 29 个 MTF 和 2363 家能够提供紧急剖腹产的民用医院。总体而言,估计有 167759762 名女性(364 万 TRICARE 受益人和 164119762 名平民)被纳入这些服务区。分析确定了 29 个 MTF 中有 17 个(58.6%)能够提供紧急剖腹产护理,这些 MTF 位于 30 分钟集水区内。其中,3 个 MTF 是这些地区唯一能够提供紧急剖腹产护理的设施,在 30 分钟旅行时间内,另外 14 个 MTF 的集水区部分与能够覆盖没有紧急剖腹产替代途径的地区的民用医院重叠。扩大这些 14 个 MTF 的使用范围可以提高目前没有民用医院覆盖的紧急剖腹产护理的可及性。

结论和相关性

在这项研究中,58.6%能够提供紧急剖腹产护理的 MTF 位于有潜力在 30 分钟旅行时间内改善产科护理可及性的区域。在 MTF 结构调整的背景下,应优先考虑在这些重要的准入区域维持 MTF。这种优先考虑有可能改善美国服务不足的平民群体,特别是居住在农村地区的平民群体获得紧急剖腹产护理的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09c8/8749478/703d2f4850aa/jamanetwopen-e2142835-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09c8/8749478/55f74b7e4787/jamanetwopen-e2142835-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09c8/8749478/703d2f4850aa/jamanetwopen-e2142835-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09c8/8749478/55f74b7e4787/jamanetwopen-e2142835-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09c8/8749478/703d2f4850aa/jamanetwopen-e2142835-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Geospatial Analysis of Access to Emergency Cesarean Delivery for Military and Civilian Populations in the US.美国军、民人群紧急剖宫产可及性的地理空间分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2142835. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42835.
2
Effect of managed care enrollment on primary and repeat cesarean rates among U.S. Department of Defense health care beneficiaries in military and civilian hospitals worldwide, 1999-2002.1999 - 2002年全球军事和民用医院中美国国防部医疗保健受益人的管理式医疗注册对初次和再次剖宫产率的影响。
Birth. 2004 Dec;31(4):254-64. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00317.x.
3
In defense of Direct Care: Limiting access to military hospitals could worsen quality and safety.为直接护理辩护:限制进入军队医院可能会降低质量和安全性。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug;57(4):723-733. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13885. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
4
Spatial Typologies of Care: Understanding the Implications of the Spatial Distribution of Off-Base Civilian Behavioral Health Providers Who Accept TRICARE Prime to Service Persons and Their Dependents.护理的空间类型学:理解接受TRICARE Prime保险的基地外民用行为健康服务提供者的空间分布对军人及其家属的影响。
Mil Med. 2015 Sep;180(9):979-85. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00229.
5
Effects of maternal characteristics on cesarean delivery rates among U.S. Department of Defense healthcare beneficiaries, 1996-2002.1996 - 2002年美国国防部医疗保健受益人群中产妇特征对剖宫产率的影响
Birth. 2004 Mar;31(1):3-11. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.0268.x.
6
Spatial Analysis of Access to Psychiatrists for US Military Personnel and Their Families.美国军人及其家属获取精神科医生服务的空间分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2249314. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.49314.
7
Estimating a Change from TRICARE to Commercial Insurance Plans.估算从军人医疗保健计划(TRICARE)转换为商业保险计划的变化。
Mil Med. 2018 Nov 1;183(11-12):e354-e358. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy015.
8
Intrapartum obstetric care in the United States military: Comparison of military and civilian care systems within TRICARE.美国军队中的分娩期产科护理:比较TRICARE体系内的军队与民用护理系统。
Birth. 2017 Dec;44(4):337-344. doi: 10.1111/birt.12298. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
9
Did Saving Mothers, Giving Life Expand Timely Access to Lifesaving Care in Uganda? A Spatial District-Level Analysis of Travel Time to Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care.拯救母亲,赋予生命:乌干达扩大紧急产科和新生儿护理的及时获得情况如何?基于旅行时间的空间区域分析。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019 Mar 13;7(Suppl 1):S151-S167. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00366. Print 2019 Mar 11.
10
Emergency General Surgery Volume and Its Impact on Outcomes in Military Treatment Facilities.军事医疗机构急诊普通外科的容量及其对预后的影响。
J Surg Res. 2020 Mar;247:287-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.08.030. Epub 2019 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes for Black and White Patients After Certification of Nearby Stroke Centers.附近卒中中心认证后黑人和白人患者的治疗结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2522019. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.22019.
2
Does Exposure to Certified Stroke Centers Affect All Communities Equitably? Stroke Patient Outcomes by Community Socioeconomic Status.接触经认证的卒中中心是否对所有社区公平?按社区社会经济地位划分的卒中患者结局。
Ann Emerg Med. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.05.015.
3
Treatments and Patient Outcomes Following Stroke Center Expansion.

本文引用的文献

1
Travel Time to Access Obstetric and Neonatal Care in the United States.美国获得产科和新生儿护理的就医时间。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;136(3):610-612. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004053.
2
The US Military Health System: Promoting Readiness And Providing Health Care.美国军事卫生系统:促进战备和提供医疗保健。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Aug;38(8):1259-1267. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00239.
3
Levels of Maternal Care: Obstetric Care Consensus No, 9.产妇保健水平:产科保健共识 9 号。
卒中中心扩张后的治疗方法和患者预后。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2444683. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44683.
4
Environmental Justice Index and adverse pregnancy outcomes.环境正义指数与不良妊娠结局。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Feb 23;4(1):100330. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100330. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Geospatial distribution of relative cesarean section rates within the USA.美国内相对剖宫产率的地理空间分布。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Jul 15;15(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06141-w.
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;134(2):e41-e55. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003383.
4
Military-Civilian Partnerships in Training, Sustaining, Recruitment, Retention, and Readiness: Proceedings from an Exploratory First-Steps Meeting.军民在培训、维持、招募、留用和战备方面的伙伴关系:探索性初步会议记录
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Aug;227(2):284-292. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.04.030. Epub 2018 May 23.
5
Child Mortality In The US And 19 OECD Comparator Nations: A 50-Year Time-Trend Analysis.美国与 19 个经合组织比较国家的儿童死亡率:50 年时间趋势分析。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jan;37(1):140-149. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0767.
6
Longer travel time to district hospital worsens neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cross-sectional study of the effect of delays in receiving emergency cesarean section in Rwanda.长途前往地区医院会恶化新生儿结局:卢旺达延迟接受紧急剖宫产的影响的回顾性横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 25;17(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1426-1.
7
Civilian-military partnerships.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 May;82(5):977-978. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001398.
8
Perinatal regionalization: a geospatial view of perinatal critical care, United States, 2010-2013.围产期区域化:2010 - 2013年美国围产期重症监护的地理空间视角
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;216(2):185.e1-185.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
9
A National Trauma Care System to Achieve Zero Preventable Deaths After Injury: Recommendations From a National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Report.建立国家创伤护理系统以实现创伤后零可预防死亡:美国国家科学院、工程院和医学院报告的建议
JAMA. 2016 Sep 6;316(9):927-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.8524.
10
Why Are Obstetric Units in Rural Hospitals Closing Their Doors?为什么农村医院的产科病房正在关闭?
Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug;51(4):1546-60. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12441. Epub 2016 Jan 25.