Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI.
Ann Surg. 2022 Feb 1;275(2):406-413. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005258.
The American College of Surgeons (ACS) conducts a robust quality improvement program for ACS-verified trauma centers, yet many injured patients receive care at non-accredited facilities. This study tested for variation in outcomes across non-trauma hospitals and characterized hospitals associated with increased mortality.
The study included state trauma registry data of 37,670 patients treated between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015. Clinical data were supplemented with data from the American Hospital Association and US Department of Agriculture, allowing comparisons among 100 nontrauma hospitals.
Using Bayesian techniques, risk-adjusted and reliability-adjusted rates of mortality and interfacility transfer, as well as Emergency Departments length-of-stay (ED-LOS) among patients transferred from EDs were calculated for each hospital. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients ages >55 years and those with decreased Glasgow coma scores (GCS). Multiple imputation was used to address missing data.
Mortality varied 3-fold (0.9%-3.1%); interfacility transfer rates varied 46-fold (2.1%-95.6%); and mean ED-LOS varied 3-fold (81-231 minutes). Hospitals that were high and low statistical outliers were identified for each outcome, and subgroup analyses demonstrated comparable hospital variation. Metropolitan hospitals were associated increased mortality [odds ratio (OR) 1.7, P = 0.004], decreased likelihood of interfacility transfer (OR 0.7, P ≤ 0.001), and increased ED-LOS (coef. 0.1, P ≤ 0.001) when compared with nonmetropolitan hospitals and risk-adjusted.
Wide variation in trauma outcomes exists across nontrauma hospitals. Efforts to improve trauma quality should include engagement of nontrauma hospitals to reduce variation in outcomes of injured patients treated at those facilities.
美国外科医师学会(ACS)为 ACS 认证的创伤中心开展了一项强大的质量改进计划,但许多受伤患者在未获得认证的机构接受治疗。本研究检验了非创伤医院之间的结果差异,并确定了与死亡率增加相关的医院。
该研究纳入了 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间接受治疗的 37670 名患者的州创伤登记数据。临床数据补充了美国医院协会和美国农业部的数据,使 100 家非创伤医院之间可以进行比较。
使用贝叶斯技术,为每家医院计算了死亡率和院内转院的风险调整和可靠性调整率,以及从急诊科转院患者的急诊科停留时间(ED-LOS)。对年龄>55 岁和格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)降低的患者进行了亚组分析。采用多重插补法处理缺失数据。
死亡率差异达 3 倍(0.9%-3.1%);院内转院率差异达 46 倍(2.1%-95.6%);ED-LOS 均值差异达 3 倍(81-231 分钟)。确定了每个结果的高和低统计离群值医院,并进行了亚组分析,结果表明存在类似的医院差异。与非大都市医院相比,大都市医院的死亡率增加(优势比[OR]1.7,P=0.004),院内转院的可能性降低(OR 0.7,P≤0.001),且 ED-LOS 增加(系数 0.1,P≤0.001),这些差异在调整风险后仍然存在。
非创伤医院的创伤结果存在广泛差异。为改善创伤质量而进行的努力应包括让非创伤医院参与进来,以减少在这些机构接受治疗的受伤患者结果的差异。