Department of Hearing and Speech, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City.
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Bowling Green State University, OH.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Jan 18;31(1):322-341. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00049. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
This study examined topic initiation (TI) in conversations involving people with aphasia (PWA), matched people without aphasia (M-PWoA), and speech-language pathologists who were their conversation partners (SLP-Ps). For each speaker type, we analyzed patterns of distribution of typical mechanisms of TI and patterns of simultaneous use of multiple TI mechanisms. Lastly, we examined associations between use of simultaneous TI mechanisms and communicative success.
Twenty PWA and 20 M-PWoA each participated in two conversations with SLP-Ps. Conversation samples were analyzed for TI locations and mechanisms, with results tallied for each speaker type following a published typology. A measure of communicative success was applied to TI utterances. Rank-order correlations were conducted to evaluate the patterns of distribution of the TI mechanisms between speaker types and the patterns of multiple mechanism usage between speaker types. Descriptive analysis was conducted to provide additional insight to the TI behaviors of each speaker type and to evaluate the relationship between multiple TI mechanisms and communicative success.
All speaker types used cohesion most often to achieve TI. PWA used an abrupt method of TI (noncoherent TI) more often than other speaker types. A single mechanism of TI was used most often by all speaker types, except for SLP-Ps when they were in conversations with PWA. In this case, SLP-Ps most often used two or more layered mechanisms of TI. SLP-Ps also used a highly salient TI mechanism with greater frequency when speaking with PWA than observed between other speaker types. When PWA layered mechanisms of TI, they appeared to be more likely to achieve better communicative success.
Specific, teachable behaviors such as favoring certain TI mechanisms and using multiple TI mechanisms may improve communicative success during TI for PWA. Furthermore, findings suggest that SLP-Ps modify their TI behaviors when speaking to PWA.
本研究考察了涉及失语症患者(PWA)、无失语症匹配者(M-PWoA)和作为其对话伙伴的言语语言病理学家(SLP-Ps)的对话中的话题启动(TI)。对于每种说话者类型,我们分析了典型 TI 机制的分布模式和同时使用多种 TI 机制的模式。最后,我们考察了同时使用 TI 机制与交际成功之间的关系。
20 名 PWA 和 20 名 M-PWoA 分别与 20 名 SLP-Ps 进行了两次对话。根据发表的分类法,对对话样本中的 TI 位置和机制进行了分析,为每种说话者类型汇总结果。将一种交际成功的衡量标准应用于 TI 话语。进行秩相关分析,以评估不同说话者类型之间 TI 机制的分布模式和不同说话者类型之间多机制使用的模式。描述性分析用于为每种说话者类型的 TI 行为提供更多见解,并评估多个 TI 机制与交际成功之间的关系。
所有说话者类型最常使用衔接来实现 TI。与其他说话者类型相比,PWA 更常使用非连贯 TI 这一突兀的 TI 方法。所有说话者类型最常使用单一 TI 机制,除了 SLP-Ps 在与 PWA 对话时。在这种情况下,SLP-Ps 最常使用两种或更多层 TI 机制。与观察到的其他说话者类型相比,当 SLP-Ps 与 PWA 交谈时,他们更频繁地使用高度突出的 TI 机制。当 PWA 分层使用 TI 机制时,他们似乎更有可能实现更好的交际成功。
特定的、可教的行为,如倾向于使用某些 TI 机制和使用多种 TI 机制,可能会提高 PWA 在 TI 期间的交际成功。此外,研究结果表明,当与 PWA 交谈时,SLP-Ps 会改变他们的 TI 行为。