Cameron Ashley, McPhail Steven, Hudson Kyla, Fleming Jennifer, Lethlean Jennifer, Tan Ngang Ju, Finch Emma
a Speech Pathology Department , Princess Alexandra Hospital , Brisbane , Australia.
b School of Health and Behavioural Sciences , The University of Queensland , Brisbane , Australia.
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Jun;40(11):1288-1293. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1294626. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
The aim of the study was to describe and compare the confidence and knowledge of health professionals (HPs) with and without specialized speech-language training for communicating with people with aphasia (PWA) in a metropolitan hospital setting.
Ninety HPs from multidisciplinary teams completed a customized survey to identify their demographic information, knowledge of aphasia, current use of supported conversation strategies and overall communication confidence when interacting with PWA using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) to rate open-ended questions. Conventional descriptive statistics were used to examine the demographic information. Descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to analyse VAS confidence rating data. The responses to the open-ended survey questions were grouped into four previously identified key categories.
The HPs consisted of 22 (24.4%) participants who were speech-language pathologists and 68 (75.6%) participants from other disciplines (non-speech-language pathology HPs, non-SLP HPs). The non-SLP HPs reported significantly lower confidence levels (U = 159.0, p < 0.001, two-tailed) and identified fewer strategies for communicating effectively with PWA than the trained speech-language pathologists. The non-SLP HPs identified a median of two strategies identified [interquartile range (IQR) 1-3] in contrast to the speech-language pathologists who identified a median of eight strategies (IQR 7-12).
These findings suggest that HPs, particularly those without specialized communication education, are likely to benefit from formal training to enhance their confidence, skills and ability to successfully communicate with PWA in their work environment. This may in turn increase the involvement of PWA in their health care decisions. Implications for Rehabilitation Interventions to remediate health professional's (particularly non-speech-language pathology health professionals) lower levels of confidence and ability to communicate with PWA may ultimately help ensure equal access for PWA. Promote informed collaborative decision-making, and foster patient-centred care within the health care setting.
本研究旨在描述和比较在大城市医院环境中,接受过和未接受过专门言语语言训练的卫生专业人员(HP)与失语症患者(PWA)沟通时的信心和知识水平。
来自多学科团队的90名HP完成了一项定制调查,以确定他们的人口统计学信息、失语症知识、当前使用的支持性对话策略,以及在与PWA互动时使用100毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)对开放式问题进行评分的总体沟通信心。使用常规描述性统计来检查人口统计学信息。描述性统计和曼-惠特尼U检验用于分析VAS信心评分数据。对开放式调查问题的回答被归为四个先前确定的关键类别。
HP包括22名(24.4%)言语语言病理学家和68名(75.6%)来自其他学科的参与者(非言语语言病理HP,非SLP HP)。与经过训练 的言语语言病理学家相比,非SLP HP报告的信心水平显著较低(U = 159.0,p < 0.001, 双侧),并且确定的与PWA有效沟通的策略较少。非SLP HP确定的策略中位数为2种[四分位间距(IQR)1 - 3],而言语语言病理学家确定的策略中位数为8种(IQR 7 - 12)。
这些发现表明,HP,特别是那些没有接受过专门沟通教育的HP,可能会从正规培训中受益,以增强他们在工作环境中与PWA成功沟通的信心、技能和能力。这反过来可能会增加PWA参与其医疗保健决策的程度。康复干预的意义 补救卫生专业人员(特别是非言语语言病理卫生专业人员)与PWA沟通时较低的信心和能力,最终可能有助于确保PWA获得平等的机会。促进明智的协作决策,并在医疗保健环境中促进以患者为中心的护理。