Oncology Unit 1, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Oncology Unit 1, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2022 Feb;170:103579. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103579. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have led to a significant change in the treatment of urological tumors where several agents are currently approved. Yet, most patients discontinue treatment due to disease progression or after the onset of severe immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). Following promising results in melanoma patients, retreatment with an ICI is receiving increasing attention as an attractive option for selected patients. We performed a literature review focusing on the feasibility, safety, timing and activity of ICI rechallenge in genitourinary cancers where very little information is available. We classified the different ICI retreatment strategies into three main clinical scenarios: retreatment after terminating a prior course of ICI while still on response; retreatment after interruption due to IRAEs; retreatment after progression while on ICI therapy. The pros and cons of these options in the field of urological tumors are then discussed, and critical suggestions proffered for the design of future clinical trials.
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的出现,改变了泌尿系统肿瘤的治疗方式,目前已有多种药物获得批准。然而,大多数患者因疾病进展或严重免疫相关不良事件(IRAEs)的发生而停药。在黑色素瘤患者中取得良好效果后,ICI 再治疗作为一种有吸引力的选择,越来越受到选定患者的关注。我们进行了一项文献综述,重点关注在泌尿系统癌症中,ICI 再挑战的可行性、安全性、时机和疗效,因为这方面的信息非常有限。我们将不同的 ICI 再治疗策略分为三种主要的临床情况:在对 ICI 仍有反应时终止先前疗程后进行再治疗;因 IRAEs 而中断后进行再治疗;在 ICI 治疗期间进展后进行再治疗。然后讨论了这些选择在泌尿系统肿瘤领域的优缺点,并为未来临床试验的设计提出了关键建议。