• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性 Rockwood III-V 型肩锁关节脱位的治疗选择:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。

Treatment options for acute Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular dislocations: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.

Sports Surgery Clinic (SSC), Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Jun;32(6):1146-1158. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.01.039. Epub 2023 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2023.01.039
PMID:36871607
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular (AC) dislocations have been treated with numerous surgical techniques over the years. The purpose of this study was to perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials to quantitatively define the optimal treatment for AC dislocations requiring operative treatment.

METHODS

A literature search of 3 databases was performed based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Randomized controlled trials comparing 1 of 10 treatments for acute Rockwood type III-V AC dislocations-nonoperative treatment, Kirschner wire fixation (KW), coracoclavicular screw fixation (Scr), hook plate (HP), open coracoclavicular cortical button (CBO), arthroscopic coracoclavicular cortical button (CBA), ≥2 coracoclavicular cortical buttons (CB2), isolated graft reconstruction (GR), cortical button with graft augmentation (CB-GR), and coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular fixation (AC)-were included. Clinical outcomes were compared using a frequentist approach to NMA, with statistical analysis performed using the R program. Treatment options were ranked using the P-score, which estimates the likelihood that the investigated treatment is the ideal method for an optimal result in each outcome measure on a scale from 0 to 1.

RESULTS

Of 5362 reviewed studies, 26 met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 1581 patients included in the NMA. AC, CB-GR, GR, CB2, CBA, and CBO demonstrated superiority over HP, Scr, KW, and nonoperative treatment at final follow-up for the Constant-Murley score and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, with AC and CB-GR showing the highest P-scores for the Constant-Murley score (0.957 and 0.781, respectively) and GR and CBO showing the highest P-scores for the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (0.896 and 0.750, respectively). GR had the highest P-score for the visual analog scale score (0.986). HP, CB2, CB-GR, AC, CBA, and CBO demonstrated superiority in the coracoclavicular distance (CCD) and recurrence at final follow-up, with HP and CB2 having the highest P-scores for the CCD (0.798 and 0.757, respectively) and with GR and CB-GR having the highest P-scores for recurrence (0.880 and 0.855, respectively). KW and Scr showed the shortest operative times (P-scores of 0.917 and 0.810, respectively), whereas GR and CBA showed the longest operative times (P-scores of 0.120 and 0.097, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there are multiple fixation options for acute Rockwood type III-V AC dislocations, adding AC fixation or graft augmentation likely improves functional outcomes and decreases the CCD and recurrence rate at final follow-up-at the expense of longer operative times.

摘要

背景

急性 Rockwood Ⅲ-Ⅴ型肩锁关节(AC)脱位多年来一直采用多种手术技术治疗。本研究的目的是进行网状荟萃分析(NMA),以定量确定需要手术治疗的 AC 脱位的最佳治疗方法。

方法

根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南,对 3 个数据库进行文献检索。比较 10 种治疗急性 Rockwood Ⅲ-Ⅴ 型 AC 脱位的治疗方法的随机对照试验 - 非手术治疗、克氏针固定(KW)、喙锁螺钉固定(Scr)、钩板(HP)、开放式喙锁皮质纽扣(CBO)、关节镜下喙锁皮质纽扣(CBA)、≥2 个喙锁皮质纽扣(CB2)、单纯移植物重建(GR)、皮质纽扣加移植物增强(CB-GR)和喙锁和肩锁固定(AC)。使用频率主义方法对 NMA 进行临床结果比较,使用 R 程序进行统计分析。使用 P 分数对治疗选择进行排名,P 分数估计在所研究的治疗方法在每个结果测量中的理想方法的可能性,每个结果测量的理想方法的可能性在 0 到 1 的范围内。

结果

在 5362 篇综述研究中,26 项符合纳入标准,共有 1581 名患者纳入 NMA。AC、CB-GR、GR、CB2、CBA 和 CBO 在最终随访时的 Constant-Murley 评分和上肢残疾评分(DASH)方面优于 HP、Scr、KW 和非手术治疗,AC 和 CB-GR 对 Constant-Murley 评分的 P 分数最高(分别为 0.957 和 0.781),GR 和 CBO 对 DASH 的 P 分数最高(分别为 0.896 和 0.750)。GR 在视觉模拟量表评分方面的 P 分数最高(0.986)。HP、CB2、CB-GR、AC、CBA 和 CBO 在最终随访时的喙锁距离(CCD)和复发方面表现出优势,HP 和 CB2 的 CCD 的 P 分数最高(分别为 0.798 和 0.757),GR 和 CB-GR 的复发 P 分数最高(分别为 0.880 和 0.855)。KW 和 Scr 的手术时间最短(P 分数分别为 0.917 和 0.810),而 GR 和 CBA 的手术时间最长(P 分数分别为 0.120 和 0.097)。

结论

尽管急性 Rockwood Ⅲ-Ⅴ 型肩锁关节脱位有多种固定选择,但增加 AC 固定或移植物增强可能会改善功能结果,并降低最终随访时的 CCD 和复发率 - 但手术时间更长。

相似文献

1
Treatment options for acute Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular dislocations: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.急性 Rockwood III-V 型肩锁关节脱位的治疗选择:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Jun;32(6):1146-1158. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.01.039. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
2
Comparison of hook plate with versus without double-tunnel coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for repair of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.钩钢板与双隧道喙锁韧带重建治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的比较:前瞻性随机对照临床试验。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
3
Does coracoclavicular augmentation additional to hook plate fixation provide benefits in acute unstable acromioclavicular dislocation? A meta-analysis.除钩钢板固定外,喙锁韧带增强术对急性不稳定肩锁关节脱位是否有益?一项荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 4;23(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05142-x.
4
Hybrid coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular reconstruction in chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations yields good functional and radiographic results.慢性肩锁关节脱位的杂交型肩锁关节和肩峰锁骨关节重建可获得良好的功能和影像学结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jun;30(6):2084-2091. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06790-7. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
5
No difference in clinical outcome at 2-year follow-up in patients with type III and V acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with hook plate or physiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial.在接受钩板或物理治疗的 III 型和 V 型肩锁关节脱位患者中,2 年随访时临床结果无差异:一项随机对照试验。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Jun;31(6):1122-1136. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.003. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
6
Is AC TightRope fixation better than Bosworth screw fixation for minimally invasive operative treatment of Rockwood III AC joint injury?对于Rockwood III型肩锁关节损伤的微创治疗,解剖型钛缆固定是否优于Bosworth螺钉固定?
Injury. 2015 Nov;46 Suppl 6:S113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.060. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
7
Comparison of Hook Plate Fixation Versus Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Fixation Using Multiple Soft Anchor Knots for the Treatment of Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations.钩钢板固定与关节镜下多枚软锚钉固定治疗急性重度肩锁关节脱位的比较。
Arthroscopy. 2021 May;37(5):1414-1423. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.12.189. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
8
Coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction with a double-bundle semitendinosus autograft and cortical buttons for chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations: clinical and imaging outcomes.采用半腱肌双束自体移植物和皮质纽扣重建喙锁和肩锁韧带治疗慢性肩锁关节脱位:临床和影像学结果。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Sep;33(9):e507-e518. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.01.019. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
9
[Comparative study on the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation: coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction combined with hook plate fixation or suture-anchor fixation].肩锁关节脱位治疗的比较研究:喙锁韧带重建联合钩钢板固定或缝合锚钉固定
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Apr;51(4):349-53.
10
Comparison of hook plate alone, hook plate augmented with suture anchor, and arthroscopically-assisted tightrope fixation in the treatment of patients with acute type v acromioclavicular joint dislocations.单纯钩钢板、钩钢板联合缝线锚钉与关节镜下经皮张力带固定治疗急性 V 型肩锁关节脱位的比较。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023 Jun;109(4):103494. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103494. Epub 2022 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Suture stabilization of the acromioclavicular ligament plus clavicular hook plate fixation vs. total ligament repair with loop plates for acromioclavicular joint dislocation.肩锁韧带缝合固定加锁骨钩钢板固定与使用环行钢板进行全韧带修复治疗肩锁关节脱位的比较
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Aug 8;20(1):746. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06032-3.
2
Combined coracoclavicular ligament and transacromial capsule reconstruction for chronic acromioclavicular joint instability: clinical and radiological outcomes.联合喙锁韧带和经肩峰关节囊重建治疗慢性肩锁关节不稳:临床及影像学结果
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2025 May 28;59(3):170-178. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2025.25330.
3
A Novel Anatomical Double Bundle Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction with Semi Tendinosus Graft-A Functional Outcome Assessment Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital Of Eastern India.
一种采用半腱肌移植物的新型解剖双束肩锁关节重建术——印度东部一家三级护理医院的功能结果评估研究
Indian J Orthop. 2025 May 14;59(6):840-847. doi: 10.1007/s43465-025-01385-7. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Surgical treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocations.急性重度肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Mar 10;12(1):e70173. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70173. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Current Concepts in Management of Acromioclavicular Joint Injury.肩锁关节损伤管理的当前概念
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 29;13(5):1413. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051413.