Suppr超能文献

牛肉购买与消费的探索性研究:西班牙与巴西的地理和文化差异

An Exploratory Study of the Purchase and Consumption of Beef: Geographical and Cultural Differences between Spain and Brazil.

作者信息

Magalhaes Danielle Rodrigues, Maza María Teresa, Prado Ivanor Nunes do, Fiorentini Giovani, Kirinus Jackeline Karsten, Campo María Del Mar

机构信息

Department of Animal Husbandry and Food Science, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón-IA2, University of Zaragoza-CITA, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.

Department of Food Engineering, Campus Fernando Costa, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga 13635-900, BR, Brazil.

出版信息

Foods. 2022 Jan 5;11(1):129. doi: 10.3390/foods11010129.

Abstract

Beef consumption and production in Spain and Brazil are different with the consumption of beef in Brazil being three times higher than in Spain. In addition, there are variations in the economic value of production and in the traceability system. Therefore, the aim of this research was to understand the purchasing and consumption patterns using the customer behavior analysis technique of focus groups, which analyzed motivations for the consumption of beef, classifying their preferences by the intrinsic and extrinsic attributes at the time of purchase. The key aspect of the consumption of beef, both for Spanish and Brazilian consumers, was personal satisfaction/flavor. Spanish consumers were more conscious than Brazilians of the beneficial and harmful qualities that meat provides. The presence of fat was the factor that most restricted intake in both countries. The most important intrinsic attributes for Spanish and Brazilian consumers were the visual aspects of the meat: color, freshness, and the quantity and disposition of fat. The most important extrinsic characteristics were the price and expiration date. Spanish consumers see packaged meat as convenient and safe, although it is considered by Brazilians to be over-manipulated. The traceability certification on the label provides credibility to the product for the Spanish but only partially for Brazilians.

摘要

西班牙和巴西的牛肉消费与生产情况有所不同,巴西的牛肉消费量比西班牙高出两倍。此外,生产的经济价值和可追溯系统也存在差异。因此,本研究的目的是运用焦点小组这种客户行为分析技术来了解购买和消费模式,该技术分析了牛肉消费的动机,并在购买时根据内在和外在属性对消费者的偏好进行分类。对于西班牙和巴西消费者而言,牛肉消费的关键因素都是个人满意度/风味。西班牙消费者比巴西消费者更了解肉类所具有的有益和有害特质。脂肪的存在是两国消费者摄入牛肉时最主要的限制因素。对于西班牙和巴西消费者来说,最重要的内在属性是肉的视觉特征:颜色、新鲜度以及脂肪的数量和分布。最重要的外在特征是价格和保质期。西班牙消费者认为包装肉方便且安全,尽管巴西消费者认为其经过了过度加工。标签上的可追溯认证为西班牙消费者提供了产品可信度,但对巴西消费者来说可信度仅为部分。

相似文献

2
Perception of beef quality for Spanish and Brazilian consumers.
Meat Sci. 2021 Feb;172:108312. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108312. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
6
Attitudinal Determinants of Beef Consumption in Venezuela: A Retrospective Survey.
Foods. 2020 Feb 16;9(2):202. doi: 10.3390/foods9020202.
7
Factors associated with consumer perception and conduct toward certified beef from Brazil.
J Food Sci. 2020 May;85(5):1542-1547. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15012. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
8
Analyzing the importance of attributes for Brazilian consumers to replace conventional beef with cultured meat.
PLoS One. 2021 May 7;16(5):e0251432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251432. eCollection 2021.
10
Consumers' beef purchasing behavior across countries.
Meat Sci. 2024 Nov;217:109611. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109611. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Turning the table toward plant-based: different perspectives on menu reformulation in food service.
Front Nutr. 2025 Jul 24;12:1601979. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1601979. eCollection 2025.
2
Systematic Analysis of the Differential Effects of Red Meat on Colorectal Cancer Risks: A Meta-Analytic Approach.
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Aug 7;56(1):170. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01247-3.
3
A qualitative analysis of Iranian consumers' perspectives on improving sausage quality.
Sci Rep. 2025 May 27;15(1):18516. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03590-8.
4
Polymorphism of Genes and Their Impact on Beef Quality.
Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2023 May 30;45(6):4749-4762. doi: 10.3390/cimb45060302.
6
Sustainable or Not? Insights on the Consumption of Animal Products in Poland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 11;19(20):13072. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013072.

本文引用的文献

1
Who has a beef with reducing red and processed meat consumption? A media framing analysis.
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Mar;25(3):578-590. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021004092. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
2
Color and Marbling as Predictors of Meat Quality Perception of Argentinian Consumers.
Foods. 2021 Jun 24;10(7):1465. doi: 10.3390/foods10071465.
3
Consumer Perspectives on Processing Technologies for Organic Food.
Foods. 2021 May 27;10(6):1212. doi: 10.3390/foods10061212.
4
Going beyond sensory and hedonic aspects: A Brazilian study of emotions evoked by beef in different contexts.
Meat Sci. 2021 Oct;180:108536. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2021.108536. Epub 2021 May 6.
6
Consumer perception of smoked Cheddar cheese.
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Feb;104(2):1560-1575. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18711. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
7
Perception of beef quality for Spanish and Brazilian consumers.
Meat Sci. 2021 Feb;172:108312. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108312. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
9
Beef quality attributes: A systematic review of consumer perspectives.
Meat Sci. 2017 Jun;128:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
10
An emotional approach to beef evaluation.
Meat Sci. 2017 May;127:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验