• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证两种用于正确分配中学课桌椅以预防背痛的工具。

Validation of Two Instruments for the Correct Allocation of School Furniture in Secondary Schools to Prevent Back Pain.

机构信息

Observational Research Group, Faculty of Education and Sport, University of Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain.

HealthyFit Group, Faculty of Education and Sport, University of Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 21;19(1):20. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010020.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19010020
PMID:35010278
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8750475/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Back pain is common in secondary school students. If we adjust the school furniture to the anthropometric characteristics of the pupils, we will improve their posture and reduce back pain. There is a high degree of mismatch between the furniture used by students and that which should be used. The objectives of this research are to discover the degree of mismatch and validate two instruments that allow a correct allocation of the furniture.

METHODS

The selected sample was 132 secondary students (14.08 ± 1.10 years). An anthropometer was used to determine the ideal height of the chair and table; data were taken from body segments. The recorded values were compared with those obtained by the two measurement instruments to be validated. Inter-measurer and intra-measurer reliability and validation were performed using t-tests and Pearson's coefficient, respectively. Different analysis techniques were used: descriptive, one-way ANOVA, t-test, and effect size. The established level of significance was ρ < 0.05.

RESULTS

The mismatch between the anthropometric dimensions of the students and the existing furniture in the classrooms was 98.5 % for the chairs and 100 % for the tables. The correlational analysis of the instruments to be validated shows an r = 0.993 in the chair and r = 0.996 in the table.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a high degree of mismatch between the furniture and the anthropometric characteristics of the students. The proposed furniture allocation instruments are adequate.

摘要

背景

中学生中普遍存在背痛问题。如果我们根据学生的人体测量特征来调整学校家具,就可以改善他们的姿势并减少背痛。学生使用的家具与应使用的家具高度不匹配。本研究的目的是发现不匹配的程度,并验证两种可正确分配家具的工具。

方法

选择了 132 名中学生(14.08 ± 1.10 岁)作为样本。使用人体测量仪来确定椅子和桌子的理想高度;数据来自身体部位。记录的值与要验证的两个测量工具获得的值进行了比较。使用 t 检验和 Pearson 系数分别进行了测量者间和测量者内的可靠性和验证。使用描述性分析、单因素方差分析、t 检验和效应量分析等不同的分析技术。置信水平设定为 ρ < 0.05。

结果

学生的人体测量尺寸与教室现有家具之间的不匹配程度为 98.5%的椅子和 100%的桌子。要验证的工具的相关性分析显示,椅子的 r = 0.993,桌子的 r = 0.996。

结论

家具与学生的人体测量特征之间存在高度不匹配。所提出的家具分配工具是合适的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8750475/4fcb8e0cbd76/ijerph-19-00020-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8750475/a3a64054e980/ijerph-19-00020-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8750475/616ffe69c0e8/ijerph-19-00020-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8750475/1fa33552e030/ijerph-19-00020-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8750475/4fcb8e0cbd76/ijerph-19-00020-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8750475/a3a64054e980/ijerph-19-00020-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8750475/616ffe69c0e8/ijerph-19-00020-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8750475/1fa33552e030/ijerph-19-00020-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a273/8750475/4fcb8e0cbd76/ijerph-19-00020-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of Two Instruments for the Correct Allocation of School Furniture in Secondary Schools to Prevent Back Pain.验证两种用于正确分配中学课桌椅以预防背痛的工具。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 21;19(1):20. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010020.
2
[Back pain prevention through the correct allocation of school furniture: validation of two instruments.].[通过正确配置学校家具预防背痛:两种工具的验证。]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2021 Sep 15;95:e202109117.
3
Degree of mismatch between anthropometric characteristics and school furniture in a sample of Spanish students aged 6-12 years old: A pilot study.学生人体测量特征与学校家具不匹配的程度:一项西班牙 6-12 岁学生的初步研究。
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2021 Dec;119(6):386-393. doi: 10.5546/aap.2021.eng.386.
4
Classroom Furniture Mismatch and Back Pain Among Adolescent School-Children in Abha City, Southwestern Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯西南部阿巴市青少年学生课桌椅不匹配与背痛的关系
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 18;16(8):1395. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081395.
5
Comparison of classroom furniture to anthropometric measures of Turkish middle school students.比较教室家具与土耳其中学生人体测量学指标。
Work. 2021;70(2):493-508. doi: 10.3233/WOR-213587.
6
Evaluation of the Indonesian National Standard for elementary school furniture based on children's anthropometry.基于儿童人体测量学对印度尼西亚小学家具国家标准的评估。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Jul;62:168-181. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
7
Evaluation of the match between anthropometric measures and school furniture dimensions in Chile.智利人体测量学指标与学校家具尺寸匹配度的评估。
Work. 2015;53(3):585-95. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152233.
8
Post-COVID-19 ergonomic school furniture design under fuzzy logic.基于模糊逻辑的后 COVID-19 人体工程学学校家具设计。
Work. 2021;69(4):1197-1208. doi: 10.3233/WOR-210652.
9
Classroom furniture and anthropometric characteristics of Iranian high school students: proposed dimensions based on anthropometric data.教室家具和伊朗高中生的人体测量学特征:基于人体测量数据的建议尺寸。
Appl Ergon. 2013 Jan;44(1):101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
10
Classroom furniture dimensions and anthropometric measures in primary school.小学教室家具尺寸与人体测量学指标
Appl Ergon. 2004 Mar;35(2):121-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2003.11.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Upper crossed syndrome in secondary school students: A mixed-method study.中学生上交叉综合征:一项混合方法研究。
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2023 Jan 24;18(4):894-907. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2023.01.008. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Degree of mismatch between anthropometric characteristics and school furniture in a sample of Spanish students aged 6-12 years old: A pilot study.学生人体测量特征与学校家具不匹配的程度:一项西班牙 6-12 岁学生的初步研究。
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2021 Dec;119(6):386-393. doi: 10.5546/aap.2021.eng.386.
2
Evaluation of the guidelines and children's ability to select the anthropometrically recommendable height of school furniture: A case study of Korean primary school children.评估指南以及儿童选择符合人体测量学建议的学校家具高度的能力:以韩国小学生为例的案例研究。
Work. 2019;64(3):427-438. doi: 10.3233/WOR-193005.
3
Classroom Furniture Mismatch and Back Pain Among Adolescent School-Children in Abha City, Southwestern Saudi Arabia.
沙特阿拉伯西南部阿巴市青少年学生课桌椅不匹配与背痛的关系
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 18;16(8):1395. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081395.
4
Risk Factors for Low Back Pain in Childhood and Adolescence: A Systematic Review.儿童和青少年腰痛的危险因素:一项系统综述。
Clin J Pain. 2018 May;34(5):468-484. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000558.
5
Evaluation of the Indonesian National Standard for elementary school furniture based on children's anthropometry.基于儿童人体测量学对印度尼西亚小学家具国家标准的评估。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Jul;62:168-181. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
6
Proposal for a universal measurement system for school chairs and desks for children from 6 to 10 years old.关于6至10岁儿童课桌椅通用测量系统的提案。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Jan;58:372-385. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
7
The influence of school furniture on students' performance and physical responses: results of a systematic review.学校家具对学生成绩和身体反应的影响:一项系统综述的结果
Ergonomics. 2017 Jan;60(1):93-110. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1170889. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
8
Evaluation of the match between anthropometric measures and school furniture dimensions in Chile.智利人体测量学指标与学校家具尺寸匹配度的评估。
Work. 2015;53(3):585-95. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152233.
9
Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research: 2016 Update.体育与运动科学研究中的伦理标准:2016年更新
Int J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;36(14):1121-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1565186. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
10
Match between classroom dimensions and students' anthropometry: re-equipment according to European educational furniture standard.教室尺寸与学生人体测量学的匹配:根据欧洲教育家具标准重新配备
Hum Factors. 2015 Feb;57(1):48-60. doi: 10.1177/0018720814533991.