Unite des Virus Emergents, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement 190, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) 1207, Health, Aix-Marseille University, 13009 Marseille, France.
École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique (EHESP) French School of Public Health, 35043 Rennes, France.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 31;19(1):436. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010436.
Unrealistic optimism, the underestimation of one's risk of experiencing harm, has been investigated extensively to understand better and predict behavioural responses to health threats. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, a relative dearth of research existed in this domain regarding epidemics, which is surprising considering that this optimistic bias has been associated with a lack of engagement in protective behaviours critical in fighting twenty-first-century, emergent, infectious diseases. The current study addresses this gap in the literature by investigating whether people demonstrated optimism bias during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe, how this changed over time, and whether unrealistic optimism was negatively associated with protective measures. Taking advantage of a pre-existing international participative influenza surveillance network ( = 12,378), absolute and comparative unrealistic optimism were measured at three epidemic stages (pre-, early, peak), and across four countries-France, Italy, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Despite differences in culture and health response, similar patterns were observed across all four countries. The prevalence of unrealistic optimism appears to be influenced by the particular epidemic context. Paradoxically, whereas absolute unrealistic optimism decreased over time, comparative unrealistic optimism increased, suggesting that whilst people became increasingly accurate in assessing their personal risk, they nonetheless overestimated that for others. Comparative unrealistic optimism was negatively associated with the adoption of protective behaviours, which is worrying, given that these preventive measures are critical in tackling the spread and health burden of COVID-19. It is hoped these findings will inspire further research into sociocognitive mechanisms involved in risk appraisal.
不切实际的乐观主义,即低估自身遭受伤害风险的倾向,已被广泛研究,以更好地理解和预测人们对健康威胁的行为反应。在 COVID-19 大流行之前,针对传染病领域的这一现象,相关研究相对较少,这令人惊讶,因为这种乐观偏见与缺乏采取保护行为有关,而这些行为对于应对 21 世纪新发传染病至关重要。本研究通过调查人们在 COVID-19 大流行的第一波期间是否表现出乐观偏见、这种偏见随时间的变化以及不切实际的乐观是否与保护措施呈负相关,填补了该领域的文献空白。本研究利用现有的国际参与性流感监测网络(=12378),在三个流行阶段(流行前、早期、高峰)和四个国家(法国、意大利、瑞士和英国)测量了绝对和相对不切实际的乐观主义。尽管文化和卫生应对存在差异,但四个国家都观察到了类似的模式。不切实际的乐观主义的流行似乎受到特定流行情况的影响。具有讽刺意味的是,虽然绝对不切实际的乐观主义随时间推移而降低,但相对不切实际的乐观主义却增加了,这表明尽管人们在评估个人风险时变得越来越准确,但他们仍然高估了他人的风险。相对不切实际的乐观主义与保护行为的采用呈负相关,这令人担忧,因为这些预防措施对于控制 COVID-19 的传播和健康负担至关重要。希望这些发现将激发对风险评估中涉及的社会认知机制的进一步研究。