• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类对新冠病毒的反应:乐观偏差、感知严重程度和焦虑的作用。

Human responses to Covid-19: The role of optimism bias, perceived severity, and anxiety.

作者信息

Fragkaki Iro, Maciejewski Dominique F, Weijman Esther L, Feltes Jonas, Cima Maaike

机构信息

Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Motenssorilaan 3, 6525 HR, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 5, 2628 CD Delft, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Jul;176:110781. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110781. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2021.110781
PMID:33623178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7891080/
Abstract

During the Covid-19 pandemic, the governments are trying to contain the spread with non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), such as social distancing rules, restrictions, and lockdowns. In an effort to identify factors that may influence population adherence to NPIs, we examined the role of optimism bias, anxiety, and perceived severity of the situation in relation to engagement in protective behavioral changes and satisfaction with governments' response to this pandemic. We conducted an online survey in 935 participants (  = 34.29; 68.88% females) that was disseminated in April and May 2020 in the Netherlands, Germany, Greece, and USA. Individuals with high optimism bias engaged less in behavioral changes, whereas individuals with high levels of anxiety and high perceived severity engaged more in behavioral changes. Individuals with high optimism bias and high levels of anxiety were less satisfied with the governments' response, albeit for different reasons. Individuals who reported low perceived severity and low government satisfaction engaged the least in behavioral changes, whereas participants who reported high perceived severity and low government satisfaction engaged the most in behavioral changes. This study contributes to a better understanding of the psychological factors that influence people's responses to NPIs.

摘要

在新冠疫情期间,各国政府试图通过非药物干预措施(NPIs)来遏制疫情传播,如社交距离规则、限制措施和封锁。为了确定可能影响民众遵守非药物干预措施的因素,我们研究了乐观偏差、焦虑以及对形势的感知严重性在参与保护性行为改变和对政府应对疫情措施的满意度方面所起的作用。我们对935名参与者(平均年龄 = 34.29岁;68.88%为女性)进行了一项在线调查,该调查于2020年4月和5月在荷兰、德国、希腊和美国开展。乐观偏差高的个体较少参与行为改变,而焦虑程度高和感知严重性高的个体更多地参与行为改变。乐观偏差高和焦虑程度高的个体对政府的应对措施不太满意,尽管原因不同。报告感知严重性低且对政府满意度低的个体参与行为改变最少,而报告感知严重性高且对政府满意度低的参与者参与行为改变最多。这项研究有助于更好地理解影响人们对非药物干预措施反应的心理因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782f/7891080/14f307bf619c/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782f/7891080/304aea4b29ee/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782f/7891080/697290149133/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782f/7891080/be699613e67a/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782f/7891080/14f307bf619c/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782f/7891080/304aea4b29ee/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782f/7891080/697290149133/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782f/7891080/be699613e67a/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/782f/7891080/14f307bf619c/gr4_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Human responses to Covid-19: The role of optimism bias, perceived severity, and anxiety.人类对新冠病毒的反应:乐观偏差、感知严重程度和焦虑的作用。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Jul;176:110781. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110781. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
2
Associations Between the Perceived Severity of the COVID-19 Pandemic, Cyberchondria, Depression, Anxiety, Stress, and Lockdown Experience: Cross-sectional Survey Study.新冠大流行严重程度感知、网络疑病症、抑郁、焦虑、压力与封控经历之间的关联:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Sep 16;7(9):e31052. doi: 10.2196/31052.
3
Citizens' Adherence to COVID-19 Mitigation Recommendations by the Government: A 3-Country Comparative Evaluation Using Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Data.公民对政府新冠疫情缓解建议的遵守情况:基于网络横断面调查数据的三国比较评估
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e20634. doi: 10.2196/20634.
4
The impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Greek population: Suicidal ideation during the first and second lockdown.COVID-19 大流行对希腊人口的影响:在第一次和第二次封锁期间的自杀意念。
Psychiatriki. 2021 Dec 20;32(4):267-270. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2021.041. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Factors Associated with the Implementation of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions for Reducing Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review.与实施非药物干预措施降低 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关的因素:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 17;18(8):4274. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084274.
7
Optimistic bias and preventive behavioral engagement in the context of COVID-19.新冠疫情背景下的乐观偏差与预防性行为参与。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Jan;17(1):1859-1866. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.06.004. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
8
Understanding the associations between information sources, sociodemographics, and views on public health measures: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic in Austria.了解信息来源、社会人口统计学与对公共卫生措施的看法之间的关联:来自奥地利新冠疫情的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 12;24(1):1576. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19061-0.
9
Investigating the relationship of COVID-19 related stress and media consumption with schizotypy, depression, and anxiety in cross-sectional surveys repeated throughout the pandemic in Germany and the UK.调查德国和英国在整个大流行期间通过横断面调查重复进行的 COVID-19 相关压力和媒体消费与精神分裂症倾向、抑郁和焦虑之间的关系。
Elife. 2022 Jul 4;11:e75893. doi: 10.7554/eLife.75893.
10
Optimism as a protective factor against the psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic through its effects on perceived stress and infection stress anticipation.乐观作为一种保护因素,通过其对感知压力和感染压力预期的影响,抵御新冠疫情的心理冲击。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Mar 16:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-02819-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of perceived severity on depression, anxiety, and insomnia among Chinese community residents during the COVID-19 lockdown.新冠疫情封锁期间,感知到的严重程度对中国社区居民抑郁、焦虑和失眠的影响
World J Psychiatry. 2025 May 19;15(5):104565. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i5.104565.
2
Strategic mindset facilitates social feedback processing and self-concept adjustment.战略思维有助于社会反馈处理和自我概念调整。
Cereb Cortex. 2025 Mar 6;35(3). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaf061.
3
Optimism bias, judgment of severity, and behavioral change during two stages of the pandemics in China.

本文引用的文献

1
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).一个全球性的大流行病政策面板数据库(牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
2
Changes in risk perception and self-reported protective behaviour during the first week of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.美国新冠疫情大流行第一周期间风险认知及自我报告的防护行为变化
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Sep 16;7(9):200742. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200742. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide lockdown on trust, attitudes toward government, and well-being.
中国疫情两个阶段中的乐观偏差、严重程度判断及行为变化
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):176. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84057-0.
4
Sociodemographic, economic, and academic factors linked with resilience in university students during covid-19 pandemic: a Brazilian cross-sectional study.社会人口学、经济学和学术因素与新冠疫情期间大学生的适应力有关:巴西的一项横断面研究。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Nov 1;12(1):615. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02138-1.
5
The Impact of Short-Form Video and Optimistic Bias on Engagement in Oral Health Prevention: Integrating a KAP Model.短视频与乐观偏差对口腔健康预防参与度的影响:整合知识、态度与行为模型
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Oct 18;14(10):968. doi: 10.3390/bs14100968.
6
Factors affecting the intention to use COVID-19 contact tracing application "StaySafe PH": Integrating protection motivation theory, UTAUT2, and system usability theory.影响使用新冠病毒接触者追踪应用程序“菲律宾安心居家”意愿的因素:整合保护动机理论、UTAUT2模型和系统可用性理论
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 1;19(8):e0306701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306701. eCollection 2024.
7
Mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic and first lockdown in Lebanon: Risk factors and daily life difficulties in a multiple-crises setting.新冠肺炎疫情和黎巴嫩首次封城期间的精神健康:多重危机环境下的风险因素和日常生活困难。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 16;19(2):e0297670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297670. eCollection 2024.
8
Willingness to reduce alcohol consumption predicted by short-form video exposure, media involvement, psychological bias, and cognitive factor.短视频曝光、媒体参与度、心理偏差和认知因素对减少酒精消费意愿的预测作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 30;15:1213539. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1213539. eCollection 2024.
9
Optimism Bias in Firearm-Related Risk Perceptions.枪支相关风险认知中的乐观偏差。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2349656. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49656.
10
Does personal experience with COVID-19 impact investment decisions? Evidence from a survey of US retail investors.感染新冠病毒的个人经历会影响投资决策吗?来自美国散户投资者调查的证据。
Int Rev Financ Anal. 2023 Jul;88:102703. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102703. Epub 2023 May 29.
新冠疫情和全国封锁对信任、对政府的态度和幸福感的影响。
Am Psychol. 2020 Jul-Aug;75(5):618-630. doi: 10.1037/amp0000662. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
4
Applying principles of behaviour change to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission.运用行为改变原则降低 SARS-CoV-2 传播风险。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):451-459. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0887-9. Epub 2020 May 6.
5
Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.利用社会和行为科学来支持 COVID-19 大流行应对。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460-471. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
6
The optimism bias.乐观偏差。
Curr Biol. 2011 Dec 6;21(23):R941-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.030. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
7
Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: a review.大流行期间保护行为的人口统计学和态度决定因素:综述。
Br J Health Psychol. 2010 Nov;15(Pt 4):797-824. doi: 10.1348/135910710X485826. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
8
Behavioural responses to influenza pandemics: what do we know?对流感大流行的行为反应:我们了解什么?
PLoS Curr. 2009 Sep 9;1:RRN1037. doi: 10.1371/currents.rrn1037.
9
A review of health behaviour theories: how useful are these for developing interventions to promote long-term medication adherence for TB and HIV/AIDS?健康行为理论综述:这些理论对于制定促进结核病和艾滋病毒/艾滋病长期药物依从性的干预措施有多大用处?
BMC Public Health. 2007 Jun 11;7:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-104.