Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 3;19(1):491. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010491.
The origins of theories specifying dietary restraint as a cause of eating disorders can be traced to the 1970s. This paper will present an overview of the origins of dietary restraint theories and a brief historical review of evidence will be summarized. Recent research will be presented, including the results from the CALERIE Phase 1 study, as well as CALERIE Phase 2, which were NIH-sponsored randomized controlled trials. CALERIE 2 provided a test of the effect of two years of caloric restriction (CR) on the development of eating disorder syndromes and symptoms in comparison to a control group that did not alter eating behavior or body weight. The intervention was effective for inducing a chronic (two-year) reduction in total energy expenditure and increased dietary restraint but did not increase symptoms of eating disorders. The results of this recent investigation and other studies have not provided experimental support for conventional dietary restraint theories of eating disorders. These findings are discussed in terms of potential revisions of dietary restraint theory, as well as the implications for a paradigm shift in public health messaging related to dieting.
理论上,饮食限制是导致饮食失调的原因,可以追溯到 20 世纪 70 年代。本文将概述饮食限制理论的起源,并简要回顾相关证据。本文将介绍近期的研究进展,包括 CALERIE 阶段 1 研究的结果,以及由美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)资助的、CALERIE 阶段 2 随机对照试验的结果。CALERIE 2 试验比较了两年热量限制(CR)对饮食失调综合征和症状发展的影响,对照组不改变饮食行为或体重。该干预措施有效地导致了总能量消耗的慢性(两年)减少和饮食限制的增加,但并未增加饮食失调的症状。最近的这项研究和其他研究的结果并没有为饮食失调的传统饮食限制理论提供实验支持。本文将根据饮食限制理论的潜在修订以及与节食相关的公共卫生信息范式转变的意义来讨论这些发现。