• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一次性单基台概念与SLA、平台转换和锥形基台种植体周围边缘骨丢失的相关性

The Association of the One-Abutment at One-Time Concept with Marginal Bone Loss around the SLA and Platform Switch and Conical Abutment Implants.

作者信息

Hamudi Nasreen, Barnea Eitan, Weinberg Evgeny, Laviv Amir, Mijiritsky Eitan, Matalon Shlomo, Chaushu Liat, Kolerman Roni

机构信息

Private Practice, Calanswa 40640, Israel.

Private Practice, Tel Aviv 6416304, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 24;11(1):74. doi: 10.3390/jcm11010074.

DOI:10.3390/jcm11010074
PMID:35011814
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8745541/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Repeated abutment disconnection/reconnection may compromise the mucosal barrier and result in crestal bone level changes. The clinical significance of this phenomenon is not yet clear, as most studies on this topic are short-term. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of abutment disconnections and reconnections on peri-implant marginal bone loss over a medium-term follow-up period.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients (6 men and 15 women) with a mean age 66.23 ± 9.35 year at the time of implant placement were included. All patients who received two adjacent nonsubmerged implants were randomly assigned into one of the two groups: definitive multiunit abutments (DEFs) connected to the implant that were not removed (test group) or healing abutments (HEAs) placed at surgery, which were disconnected and reconnected 3-5 times during the prosthetic phase (control group). Peri-implant marginal bone levels (MBL) were measured through periapical X-rays images acquired immediately after the surgery (baseline), at 4-7 months immediately after prosthetic delivery, and at 1-year and 3-year follow-up visits.

RESULTS

No implant was lost or presented bone loss of more than 1.9 mm during the 3-year follow-up; thus, the survival and success rate was 100%. Peri-implant mucositis was noticed in 38.1% DEFs and 41.9% of HEAs at the 3-year follow-up assessment. At the end of 3 years, the MBL was -0.35 ± 0.69 mm for participants in the DEFs group and -0.57 ± 0.80 mm for the HEAs group, with significant statistical difference between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate connection of the multiunit abutments reduced bone loss in comparison with 3-5 disconnections noted in the healing abutments 3 years after prosthetic delivery. However, the difference between the groups was minimal; thus, the clinical relevance of those results is doubtful.

摘要

目的

反复的基台断开/重新连接可能会损害黏膜屏障并导致牙槽嵴骨水平改变。由于关于该主题的大多数研究都是短期的,这一现象的临床意义尚不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是在中期随访期内评估基台断开和重新连接对种植体周围边缘骨丢失的影响。

材料与方法

纳入21例患者(6例男性和15例女性),种植体植入时平均年龄为66.23±9.35岁。所有接受两个相邻非潜入式种植体的患者被随机分为两组之一:连接到种植体的最终多单位基台(DEFs)未被移除(试验组),或在手术时放置愈合基台(HEAs),在修复阶段断开并重新连接3 - 5次(对照组)。通过术后立即(基线)、修复体交付后4 - 7个月、1年和3年随访时采集的根尖X线图像测量种植体周围边缘骨水平(MBL)。

结果

在3年随访期间,没有种植体丢失或出现超过1.9 mm的骨丢失;因此,生存率和成功率为100%。在3年随访评估中,38.1%的DEFs和41.9%的HEAs出现种植体周围黏膜炎。3年后,DEFs组参与者的MBL为 - 0.35±0.69 mm,HEAs组为 - 0.57±0.80 mm两组之间存在显著统计学差异。

结论

与修复体交付3年后愈合基台出现的3 - 5次断开相比,多单位基台的立即连接减少了骨丢失。然而,两组之间的差异很小;因此,这些结果的临床相关性值得怀疑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42db/8745541/fb6620e48c65/jcm-11-00074-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42db/8745541/abcfc0d35dff/jcm-11-00074-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42db/8745541/39a017f48a8a/jcm-11-00074-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42db/8745541/c84c6cf6aca8/jcm-11-00074-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42db/8745541/fb6620e48c65/jcm-11-00074-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42db/8745541/abcfc0d35dff/jcm-11-00074-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42db/8745541/39a017f48a8a/jcm-11-00074-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42db/8745541/c84c6cf6aca8/jcm-11-00074-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42db/8745541/fb6620e48c65/jcm-11-00074-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The Association of the One-Abutment at One-Time Concept with Marginal Bone Loss around the SLA and Platform Switch and Conical Abutment Implants.一次性单基台概念与SLA、平台转换和锥形基台种植体周围边缘骨丢失的相关性
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 24;11(1):74. doi: 10.3390/jcm11010074.
2
Influence of abutment disconnection on peri-implant marginal bone loss: A randomized clinical trial.基台连接断开对种植体边缘骨丧失的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Apr;31(4):341-351. doi: 10.1111/clr.13572. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
3
The influence of repeated abutment changes on peri-implant tissue stability: 3-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.种植体基台反复更换对种植体周围组织稳定性的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验的3年加载后结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10(4):373-390.
4
The effect of healing abutment reconnection and disconnection on soft and hard peri-implant tissues: a short-term randomized controlled clinical trial.愈合基台再连接和断开对种植体周围软硬组织的影响:一项短期随机对照临床试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 May-Jun;28(3):807-14. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3022.
5
Marginal bone and soft tissue behavior following platform switching abutment connection/disconnection--a dog model study.平台转换基台连接/断开后边缘骨与软组织的行为——一项犬模型研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Sep;26(9):983-91. doi: 10.1111/clr.12385. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
6
Immediate positioning of a definitive abutment versus repeated abutment replacements in post-extractive implants: 3-year follow-up of a randomised multicentre clinical trial.拔牙后种植体中即刻植入定制基台与多次更换基台的对比:一项随机多中心临床试验的3年随访
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Winter;3(4):285-96.
7
Immediate positioning of definitive abutments versus repeated abutment replacements in immediately loaded implants: effects on bone healing at the 1-year follow-up of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.即刻负重种植体中即刻就位最终基台与多次更换基台的比较:一项多中心随机对照试验1年随访时对骨愈合的影响
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012 Spring;5(1):9-16.
8
Do repeated changes of abutments have any influence on the stability of peri-implant tissues? One-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.种植体基台的反复更换对种植体周围组织的稳定性有影响吗?一项多中心随机对照试验的一年加载后结果。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10(1):57-72.
9
Marginal Bone Remodeling around healing Abutment vs Final Abutment Placement at Second Stage Implant Surgery: A 12-month Randomized Clinical Trial.二期种植手术中愈合基台周围与最终基台植入时的边缘骨重塑:一项为期12个月的随机临床试验。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Jan 1;17(1):7-15. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1795.
10
One-Abutment One-Time Effect on Peri-Implant Marginal Bone: A Prospective, Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind Study.单基台一次性植入对种植体周围边缘骨的影响:一项前瞻性、对照、随机、双盲研究。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jul 27;14(15):4179. doi: 10.3390/ma14154179.

引用本文的文献

1
Vacuum Plasma Treatment Device for Enhancing Fibroblast Activity on Machined and Rough Titanium Surfaces.用于增强加工及粗糙钛表面成纤维细胞活性的真空等离子体处理装置
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Mar 7;12(3):71. doi: 10.3390/dj12030071.
2
Comparative evaluation of biological, mechanical, and patient-reported outcomes of angulated screw channel abutments versus multi-unit abutment-retained single-unit implant restorations in the anterior esthetic zone: An- study.角度螺钉通道基台与多单位基台固位单单位种植体修复体在前牙美学区的生物学、机械学和患者报告结局的比较评价:一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2023 Jul-Sep;23(3):244-252. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_101_23.
3

本文引用的文献

1
One Abutment One Time: A Multicenter, Prospective, Controlled, Randomized Study.一次基台,一次完成:一项多中心、前瞻性、对照、随机研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 17;17(24):9453. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249453.
2
Influence of abutment material and modifications on peri-implant soft-tissue attachment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of histological animal studies.基台材料和修改方式对种植体周围软组织附着的影响:组织学动物研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Mar;125(3):426-436. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.01.025. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
3
Influence of abutment disconnection on peri-implant marginal bone loss: A randomized clinical trial.
Biomechanical evaluation of abutment stability in morse taper implant connections in different times: A retrospective clinical study compared with an in vitro analysis.
不同时间摩尔斯锥度种植体连接中基台稳定性的生物力学评估:一项与体外分析相比较的回顾性临床研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 12;9(4):e15312. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15312. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Covariates Relating to Implant Failure and Marginal Bone Loss of a Novel Triangular Neck-Implant Placed by Post-Graduate Students: A 1-Year Prospective Cohort Study.与研究生植入的新型三角形颈部种植体失败及边缘骨丢失相关的协变量:一项为期1年的前瞻性队列研究。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 8;15(6):1987. doi: 10.3390/ma15061987.
基台连接断开对种植体边缘骨丧失的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Apr;31(4):341-351. doi: 10.1111/clr.13572. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
4
Influence of the abutment height and connection timing in early peri-implant marginal bone changes: A prospective randomized clinical trial.基台高度和连接时机对种植体早期边缘骨变化的影响:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Sep;29(9):907-914. doi: 10.1111/clr.13343.
5
Histological and micro-CT analysis of peri-implant soft and hard tissue healing on implants with different healing abutments configurations.不同愈合基台构型种植体周围软硬组织愈合的组织学和微 CT 分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29(10):1007-1015. doi: 10.1111/clr.13367. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
6
Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Peri-Implant Soft Tissues around Machined and Direct Metal Laser Sintered (DMLS) Healing Abutments in Humans.种植体周围软组织的免疫组织化学评价:机加工和直接金属激光烧结(DMLS)愈合基台的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 30;15(8):1611. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081611.
7
Molecular Assessment of Human Peri-implant Mucosal Healing at Laser-Modified and Machined Titanium Abutments.激光改性和机械加工钛基台周围人种植体黏膜愈合的分子评估
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jul/Aug;33(4):895-904. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6367.
8
Should the restoration of adjacent implants be splinted or nonsplinted? A systematic review and meta-analysis.相邻种植体修复时应采用夹板固定还是非夹板固定?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Jan;121(1):41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
9
Peri-implantitis.种植体周围炎。
J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S267-S290. doi: 10.1002/JPER.16-0350.
10
Peri-implant mucositis.种植体周围黏膜炎。
J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S257-S266. doi: 10.1002/JPER.16-0488.