用于住院牙科麻醉的丙泊酚。比较丙泊酚作为单一麻醉剂与硫喷妥钠和氟烷用于住院牙科麻醉的效果。

Propofol for inpatient dental anaesthesia. A comparison of propofol as sole anaesthetic agent with thiopentone and halothane for inpatient dental anaesthesia.

作者信息

Hunter S J, McLaren C A

机构信息

Department of Anaesthetics, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Wroughton, Wiltshire.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 1988 Mar;43 Suppl:81-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb09080.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb09080.x

PMID:3259107

Abstract

The induction, maintenance and recovery characteristics of propofol anaesthesia were compared with thiopentone induction and halothane maintenance in 51 spontaneously breathing, intubated patients who underwent dental surgery. Induction with thiopentone produced fewer side effects than propofol, notably pain on injection. Control of the depth of anaesthesia was better in patients who breathed halothane than in those who received intermittent bolus doses of propofol. Recovery characteristics of the two groups were similar.

摘要

在51例接受牙科手术、自主呼吸且已插管的患者中，比较了丙泊酚麻醉的诱导、维持和恢复特征与硫喷妥钠诱导、氟烷维持的情况。硫喷妥钠诱导产生的副作用比丙泊酚少，尤其是注射时的疼痛。吸入氟烷的患者对麻醉深度的控制优于接受丙泊酚间歇推注的患者。两组的恢复特征相似。