Leighton Kim, Kardong-Edgren Suzan, Jones Anna, Reedy Gabriel
Itqan Clinical Simulation & Innovation Center, Hamad Medical Corporation, PO Box 3050, Doha, 00000, Qatar.
Health Professions Education, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Charlestown Navy Yard, 36 1st Avenue, Boston, MA, 02129, USA.
Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Jan 10;7(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41077-021-00196-8.
In the simulation community, colleagues who are no longer clinically practicing were often proximal to the COVID-19 response, not working in the frontlines of patient care. At the same time, their work as simulationists changed dramatically or was halted. This research explored the experiences of those simulationists who have clinical backgrounds but did not provide direct patient care during the initial pandemic response. The aim of this study was to allow those simulationists to share and have their stories heard.
This qualitative research used a narrative approach to answer the research question: What were the experiences of those in the simulation community who did not contribute to the frontline patient care response during the early stages of the pandemic? A semi-structured questionnaire aimed at eliciting a story was disseminated through online simulation discussion boards. Data was collected through PHONIC with options to type or speak responses. Responses were analyzed using an inductive analytical process to identify themes or patterns in the narratives.
Thirty-six respondents completed the survey between August 1, 2020 and November 30, 2020. Narrative arcs were identified that illustrated the events, actions, thoughts and feelings representative of experiences shared by many simulationists. Two major themes emerged: Challenges and Opportunities. Challenges included feelings of guilt; frustration; overwhelmed, stressed and exhausted; being away from the action, being unused and underappreciated. Opportunities included leadership (evolution and innovation), personal development, and being a part of something.
The findings reflect a snapshot in time of how simulation was viewed and used in the world during a pandemic through the personal stories of simulationists with clinical backgrounds who did not provide direct patient care. Sharing these narratives may inform future simulation development; however, it is vitally important that the emotions are recognized and acknowledged. Managers should ensure mental health resources and support are available to all staff, including those not deployed to the frontline.
在模拟医学领域,那些不再从事临床工作的同事常常参与到了新冠疫情应对工作中,但并未在患者护理的前线工作。与此同时,他们作为模拟医学专家的工作发生了巨大变化或陷入停滞。本研究探讨了那些具有临床背景但在疫情初期未提供直接患者护理的模拟医学专家的经历。本研究的目的是让这些模拟医学专家分享他们的故事并被倾听。
这项定性研究采用叙事方法来回答研究问题:在疫情早期,模拟医学领域中那些没有为前线患者护理做出贡献的人有哪些经历?通过在线模拟讨论板发放了一份旨在引出故事的半结构化问卷。通过PHONIC收集数据,受访者可以选择打字或语音回复。使用归纳分析过程对回复进行分析,以识别叙事中的主题或模式。
36名受访者在2020年8月1日至2020年11月30日期间完成了调查。确定了叙事弧线,这些弧线说明了许多模拟医学专家所共有的经历中的事件、行动、想法和感受。出现了两个主要主题:挑战和机遇。挑战包括内疚感、沮丧、不堪重负、压力大与疲惫、远离行动、未被利用和未得到赏识。机遇包括领导力(演变与创新)、个人发展以及成为某件事的一部分。
这些发现通过具有临床背景但未提供直接患者护理的模拟医学专家的个人故事,反映了疫情期间全球对模拟医学的看法和应用情况。分享这些叙事可能为未来的模拟医学发展提供参考;然而,认识并承认这些情绪至关重要。管理者应确保为所有员工,包括未被部署到前线的员工,提供心理健康资源和支持。