Suppr超能文献

逆行性肾内手术:激光对决(钬激光与铥光纤激光)

Retrograde intrarenal surgery: laser showdown (Ho:YAG vs thulium fiber laser).

作者信息

Corrales Mariela, Traxer Olivier

机构信息

Sorbonne University GRC Urolithiasis no. 20-Tenon Hospital, Paris, France.

出版信息

Curr Opin Urol. 2022 Mar 1;32(2):179-184. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000971.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) has always been recommended for large stones > 20 mm, using the Ho:YAG laser. The introduction of a new technology in the urological market, the thulium fiber laser (TFL) has revolutionized the endourology world because of its characteristics and significantly shorter laser-on time (LOT) and operative time, without scarifying the champ vision. The aim of this review is to evaluate the most relevant findings of the last 2 years of each laser technology, confronting Ho:YAG vs TFL, analyzing who is more suitable for performing an efficient RIRS.

RECENT FINDINGS

Five full clinical trials using TFL for RIRS were found. Median LOT was between 2.8 and 34 min. All stones were similar in terms of stone volume, >500 mm3, and stone density, > 800 HU. Low complication rate, mostly Clavien-Dindo grade I and II and not related to the laser itself. One clinical trial only analyzed the efficacy of TFL for > 20 mm renal stones.

SUMMARY

Based on this review, TFL performs a more efficient RIRS than the Ho:YAG laser with similar safety.

摘要

综述目的

逆行性肾内手术(RIRS)一直被推荐用于治疗直径大于20毫米的大结石,采用钬激光(Ho:YAG)。泌尿外科市场上一项新技术——铥光纤激光(TFL)的引入,因其特性以及显著缩短的激光开启时间(LOT)和手术时间,且不影响视野,给腔内泌尿外科领域带来了变革。本综述的目的是评估过去两年每种激光技术的最相关研究结果,对比钬激光与铥光纤激光,分析哪种更适合进行高效的逆行性肾内手术。

最新发现

发现了五项使用铥光纤激光进行逆行性肾内手术的完整临床试验。激光开启时间中位数在2.8至34分钟之间。所有结石在结石体积(>500立方毫米)和结石密度(>800亨氏单位)方面相似。并发症发生率低,大多为Clavien-Dindo I级和II级,且与激光本身无关。仅一项临床试验分析了铥光纤激光对直径大于20毫米肾结石的疗效。

总结

基于本综述,铥光纤激光在安全性相似的情况下,比钬激光能更高效地进行逆行性肾内手术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验