• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钬激光光纤碎石术(Fiber Dust)与微创经皮肾镜取石术(min iPerc)治疗 10~20mm 肾结石的随机对照研究。

A comparison among RIRS and MiniPerc for renal stones between 10 and 20 mm using thulium fiber laser (Fiber Dust): a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Division of Urology, Sant'Anna Hospital, San Fermo della Battaglia, Italy.

Division of Urology, ASST Valle Olona, Busto Arsizio Hospital, Busto Arsizio, Italy.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2022 Oct;40(10):2555-2560. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04133-w. Epub 2022 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-022-04133-w
PMID:36029330
Abstract

PURPOSE

We performed a prospective randomized comparison among Retrograde IntraRenal Surgery (RIRS) and MiniPerc (MP) for stones between 10 and 20 mm to evaluate outcomes with the same laser device: Fiber Dust.

METHODS

Patients with a single renal stone between 10 and 20 mm were randomized to RIRS (Group A) versus MP (Group B). Exclusion criteria were age < 18 or > 75, presence of acute infection, coagulation impairments, cardiovascular or pulmonary comorbidities. In both groups, the Fiber Dust laser was used. A CT scan after 3 months was performed. A negative CT scan or asymptomatic patients with stone fragments < 3 mm and a negative urinary culture were the criteria to assess the stone-free status. A statistical analysis was carried out to assess success, complication and retreatment rates and need for auxiliary treatments.

RESULTS

Between January 2021 and January 2022, 186 patients were enrolled (90 in Group A and 96 in Group B). Mean stone size was 15.8 mm and 14.9 mm in Group A and B, respectively (p = 0.23). The overall stone-free rate (SFR) was 73.3% for Group A and 84.4% for Group B. A higher SFR was reached for upper calyceal stones in Group A (90.4%) lower calyceal stones in Group B (91.6%). Retreatment rate (p = 0.31) and auxiliary procedure rate (p = 0.18) were comparable. Complication rate was 5.5% and 5.2% for Groups A and B, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

RIRS and MP are both effective to obtain a postoperative SFR with Fiber Dust. According to the stone position one treatment is superior to the other one.

摘要

目的

我们对 10 至 20 毫米之间的结石进行了逆行肾盂内手术(RIRS)和迷你经皮肾镜取石术(MP)的前瞻性随机比较,以评估使用相同激光设备(纤维尘)的结果。

方法

将 10 至 20 毫米之间的单个肾结石患者随机分为 RIRS(A 组)和 MP(B 组)。排除标准为年龄<18 岁或>75 岁、存在急性感染、凝血障碍、心血管或肺部合并症。两组均使用纤维尘激光。术后 3 个月进行 CT 扫描。无结石的 CT 扫描或无症状患者结石碎片<3 毫米且尿液培养阴性是评估无结石状态的标准。进行了统计学分析,以评估成功率、并发症和再治疗率以及辅助治疗的需要。

结果

2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 1 月期间,共纳入 186 名患者(A 组 90 名,B 组 96 名)。A 组和 B 组的平均结石大小分别为 15.8 毫米和 14.9 毫米(p=0.23)。A 组总体结石清除率(SFR)为 73.3%,B 组为 84.4%。A 组肾盂上段结石的 SFR 更高(90.4%),B 组肾盂下段结石的 SFR 更高(91.6%)。再治疗率(p=0.31)和辅助程序率(p=0.18)相似。A 组和 B 组的并发症发生率分别为 5.5%和 5.2%。

结论

RIRS 和 MP 均使用纤维尘获得术后 SFR,根据结石位置,一种治疗方法优于另一种。

相似文献

1
A comparison among RIRS and MiniPerc for renal stones between 10 and 20 mm using thulium fiber laser (Fiber Dust): a randomized controlled trial.钬激光光纤碎石术(Fiber Dust)与微创经皮肾镜取石术(min iPerc)治疗 10~20mm 肾结石的随机对照研究。
World J Urol. 2022 Oct;40(10):2555-2560. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04133-w. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
2
A proposed mathematical model to help preoperative planning between RIRS and MiniPerc for renal stones between 10 and 20 mm using holmium:Yag laser (Cyber Ho): the stone management according to size-hardness (SMASH) score.一种使用钬:YAG 激光(Cyber Ho)的用于 10 至 20 毫米肾结石的 RIRS 和 MiniPerc 术前规划的数学模型建议:根据大小硬度(SMASH)评分的结石管理。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Apr 2;52(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01536-9.
3
A comparison among PCNL, Miniperc and Ultraminiperc for lower calyceal stones between 1 and 2 cm: a prospective, comparative, multicenter and randomised study.PCNL、Miniperc 和 Ultraminiperc 治疗 1-2cm 下盏结石的比较:一项前瞻性、对照、多中心、随机研究。
BMC Urol. 2020 Jun 10;20(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00636-z.
4
Initial clinical experience with the thulium fiber laser from Quanta System: First 50 reported cases.来自Quanta System的铥光纤激光器的初步临床经验:首批报告的50例病例。
World J Urol. 2022 Oct;40(10):2549-2553. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04096-y. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
5
Comparing thulium fiber versus high power holmium laser in bilateral same sitting retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones: Results from a multicenter study.比较铥光纤与高能钬激光双侧同期逆行肾内手术治疗肾结石:来自一项多中心研究的结果。
Investig Clin Urol. 2024 Sep;65(5):451-458. doi: 10.4111/icu.20240185.
6
Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery with Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Large Stones in Patients with a Solitary Kidney.倾向评分匹配分析:比较逆行性肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗孤立肾患者的大结石
J Endourol. 2018 Mar;32(3):198-204. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0482.
7
Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of small renal calculi: a randomized controlled trial.微创经皮肾镜取石术(microperc)与逆行性肾内手术治疗小肾结石:一项随机对照试验。
BJU Int. 2013 Aug;112(3):355-61. doi: 10.1111/bju.12164.
8
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Dusting Fragmentation Using Thulium Fiber Laser in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.前瞻性随机对照试验比较钬光纤激光逆行肾内手术中使用粉粹术。
J Endourol. 2024 Feb;38(2):102-107. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0167. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
9
Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial.超微经皮肾镜取石术(SMP)与逆行性肾内手术治疗 1-2cm 下极肾结石:一项国际多中心随机对照试验。
BJU Int. 2018 Dec;122(6):1034-1040. doi: 10.1111/bju.14427. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
10
High-Power Holmium with MOSES Technology or Thulium Fiber Laser in MiniPerc with Suction: A New Curiosity.采用摩西技术的高功率钬激光或铥光纤激光结合抽吸技术进行微通道经皮肾镜取石术:一项新探索。
J Endourol. 2022 Oct;36(10):1348-1354. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0915. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of stone-free rates and complication profiles.经皮肾镜取石术与逆行性肾内手术:结石清除率和并发症情况的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04707-8.
2
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery on mid-sized lower calyx stones- a systematic review of last decade.经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术治疗中型下盏结石的十年系统评价
BMC Urol. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01771-1.
3
Initial experience of thulium fiber laser in retrograde intrarenal surgery for ureteral and renal stones in Japan: surgical outcomes and safety assessment compared with holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet with MOSES technology.

本文引用的文献

1
Retrograde intrarenal surgery: laser showdown (Ho:YAG vs thulium fiber laser).逆行性肾内手术:激光对决(钬激光与铥光纤激光)
Curr Opin Urol. 2022 Mar 1;32(2):179-184. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000971.
2
Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in larger kidney stones. Could SuperPulsed Thulium-fiber laser change the game?较大肾结石的逆行性肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术对比。超脉冲铥光纤激光能否改变局面?
Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(2):229-234. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0133. Epub 2021 May 16.
3
A Systematic Review of Thulium Fiber Laser: Applications and Advantages of Laser Technology in the Field of Urology.
日本铥光纤激光逆行肾内手术治疗输尿管和肾结石的初步经验:与采用MOSES技术的钬:钇铝石榴石激光相比的手术效果及安全性评估
BMC Urol. 2025 Apr 2;25(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01738-2.
4
A comparison on safety and efficacy between 24 Fr versus 18 Fr pneumatic balloon dilators for percutaneous treatment of renal stones between 10 and 20 mm: results from a contemporary cohort.24 Fr与18 Fr气动球囊扩张器经皮治疗10至20毫米肾结石的安全性和疗效比较:当代队列研究结果
World J Urol. 2025 Jan 20;43(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05445-3.
5
A comparison between vapor tunnel and virtual basket for the treatment of proximal ureteral stones using holmium:YAG laser (Cyber Ho): which is the best tool to reduce retropulsion?钬激光(Cyber Ho)治疗输尿管上段结石中蒸汽隧道与虚拟篮筐的比较:哪种工具能更好地减少后向推力?
World J Urol. 2024 Apr 20;42(1):244. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04961-y.
6
A proposed mathematical model to help preoperative planning between RIRS and MiniPerc for renal stones between 10 and 20 mm using holmium:Yag laser (Cyber Ho): the stone management according to size-hardness (SMASH) score.一种使用钬:YAG 激光(Cyber Ho)的用于 10 至 20 毫米肾结石的 RIRS 和 MiniPerc 术前规划的数学模型建议:根据大小硬度(SMASH)评分的结石管理。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Apr 2;52(1):58. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01536-9.
7
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones in adults.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行性肾内手术治疗成人肾结石。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 13;11(11):CD013445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013445.pub2.
8
The Prime Time for Flexible Ureteroscopy for Large Renal Stones Is Coming: Is Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy No Longer Needed?大型肾结石的软性输尿管镜检查黄金时代即将来临:经皮肾镜取石术不再需要了吗?
Urol Res Pract. 2023 Sep;49(5):280-284. doi: 10.5152/tud.2023.23142.
9
Prospective Comparison of Thulium and Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Lithiasis.铥激光与钬激光碎石术治疗上尿路结石的前瞻性比较
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023 Mar 21;51:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.02.012. eCollection 2023 May.
10
Efficacy and safety of surgical treatment for 1-2 cm sized lower pole of renal stone: network meta-analysis of randomized control trials.1-2厘米大小的肾下盏结石手术治疗的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
Urolithiasis. 2023 May 15;51(1):82. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01454-2.
铥光纤激光系统评价:激光技术在泌尿外科领域的应用及优势
Res Rep Urol. 2021 Jul 22;13:519-527. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S233979. eCollection 2021.
4
The best treatment approach for lower calyceal stones ≤20 mm in maximal diameter: mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery or shock wave lithotripsy. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature conducted by the European Section of Uro-Technology and Young Academic Urologists.对于最大直径≤20 毫米的下盏结石,最佳治疗方法是:微创经皮肾镜碎石术、逆行肾内手术或体外冲击波碎石术。由欧洲泌尿外科技术分会和青年泌尿外科医生进行的系统评价和文献荟萃分析。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021 Dec;73(6):711-723. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04388-3. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
5
Comparison of Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (Mini PCNL) and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for the Minimal Invasive Management of Lower Caliceal Stones.微创经皮肾镜取石术(Mini PCNL)与逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗下盏结石的疗效比较
Urol J. 2021 Feb 23;18(5):485-490. doi: 10.22037/uj.v18i07.6443.
6
Outcomes of thulium fibre laser for treatment of urinary tract stones: results of a systematic review.钬光纤激光治疗尿路结石的疗效:系统评价结果。
Curr Opin Urol. 2021 Mar 1;31(2):80-86. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000853.
7
Prone versus supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature.俯卧位与仰卧位经皮肾镜碎石术:当前文献的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2021 Feb;73(1):50-58. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.20.03960-0. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
8
Thulium fiber laser: The new kid on the block.铥光纤激光器:新出现的事物。
Turk J Urol. 2020 Nov;46(Supp. 1):S1-S10. doi: 10.5152/tud.2020.20093. Epub 2020 May 27.
9
The laser of the future: reality and expectations about the new thulium fiber laser-a systematic review.未来的激光:关于新型铥光纤激光器的现状与展望——一项系统综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Sep;8(Suppl 4):S398-S417. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.08.01.
10
A prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experience : A better understanding on the treatment options for lower pole stones.SWL、PCNL 和 RIRS 治疗 2cm 以下下盏结石的前瞻性随机对照研究:多中心经验:对下极结石治疗选择的更好理解。
World J Urol. 2017 Dec;35(12):1967-1975. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2084-7. Epub 2017 Sep 5.