Thoracic Surgery Unit, AOU Ospedali Riuniti of Ancona, via Conca 71, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AOU Ospedali Riuniti of Ancona, via Conca 71, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
Updates Surg. 2022 Jun;74(3):1097-1103. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01217-x. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (E.R.A.S.) is a multimodal, evidence-based and patient-centered pathway designed to minimize surgical stress, enhancing recovery and improving perioperative outcomes. However, considering that the potential clinical implication of E.R.A.S. on patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (V.A.T.S.) has not properly defined, we proposed to implement our minimally invasive program with a specific clinical pathway able to enhance recovery after lung resection. Aim of this study was to assess the impact of this integrated program of Enhanced Pathway of Care (E.P.C.) in Uniportal V.A.T.S. patients undergoing lung resection, in terms of efficiency and safety. We conducted a retrospective, observational study enrolling patients undergoing uniportal V.A.T.S. resections from January 2015 to May 2020. Two groups were created: pre-E.P.C. and E.P.C. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to evaluate length of stay (LOS), postoperative cardiopulmonary complications (CPC) and readmission rate (READM). We analyzed 1167 patients (E.P.C. group: 182; pre-E.P.C. group: 985). E.P.C. group has a mean LOS shorter compared to pre-E.P.C. group (3.13 vs 4.19 days, p < 0.0001) without increasing on CPC (E.P.C. 12% vs pre-E.P.C. 11%, p = 0.74) and READM rate (E.P.C. 1.6% vs pre-E.P.C. 4.9%, p = 0.07). In particular, the LOS was shortened in the E.P.C. patients submitted to lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection. Moreover, the three subgroups had similar CPC and READM rates for E.P.C. and control patients. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the benefits and safety of E.P.C. program showing a reduction of LOS for patients undergoing uniportal V.A.T.S. resection.
术后加速康复(E.R.A.S.)是一种多模式、基于证据和以患者为中心的途径,旨在最大限度地减少手术应激,促进康复并改善围手术期结局。然而,由于 E.R.A.S. 对接受电视辅助胸腔镜手术(V.A.T.S.)的患者的潜在临床意义尚未得到明确界定,我们提议实施我们的微创计划,采用一种能够促进肺切除术后康复的特定临床途径。本研究旨在评估这种增强护理途径(E.P.C.)在接受单孔 V.A.T.S.肺切除术的患者中的综合方案对效率和安全性的影响。我们进行了一项回顾性观察研究,纳入了 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 5 月期间接受单孔 V.A.T.S.切除术的患者。创建了两组:E.P.C.前组和 E.P.C.组。进行倾向评分匹配分析以评估住院时间(LOS)、术后心肺并发症(CPC)和再入院率(READM)。我们分析了 1167 例患者(E.P.C.组:182 例;E.P.C.前组:985 例)。E.P.C.组的平均 LOS 短于 E.P.C.前组(3.13 天 vs 4.19 天,p<0.0001),但 CPC 没有增加(E.P.C.组 12% vs E.P.C.前组 11%,p=0.74)和 READM 率(E.P.C.组 1.6% vs E.P.C.前组 4.9%,p=0.07)。特别是,E.P.C.患者行肺叶切除术、节段切除术和楔形切除术的 LOS 缩短。此外,E.P.C.和对照组患者的三个亚组的 CPC 和 READM 率相似。总之,本研究证明了 E.P.C.方案的益处和安全性,为接受单孔 V.A.T.S.切除术的患者缩短了 LOS。