School of Biological and Food Engineering, Suzhou University, Bianhe Middle Road 49, Suzhou 234000, Anhui, P. R. China.
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Xuefu Road 301, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, P. R. China.
Anal Methods. 2022 Jan 27;14(4):417-426. doi: 10.1039/d1ay01949j.
A low-cost electronic nose (E-nose) based on colorimetric sensors fused with Fourier transform-near-infrared (FT-NIR) spectroscopy was proposed as a rapid and convenient technique for detecting beef adulterated with duck. The total volatile basic nitrogen, protein, fat, total sugar and ash contents were measured to investigate the differences of basic properties between raw beef and duck; GC-MS was employed to analyze the difference of the volatile organic compounds emitted from these two types of meat. For variable selection and spectra denoising, the simple -test ( < 0.05) separately intergraded with first derivative, second derivative, centralization, standard normal variate transform, and multivariate scattering correction were performed and the results compared. Extreme learning machine models were built to identify the adulterated beef and predict the adulteration levels. Results showed that for recognizing the independent samples of raw beef, beef-duck mixtures, and raw duck, FT-NIR offered a 100% identification rate, which was superior to the E-nose (83.33%) created herein. In terms of predicting adulteration levels, the root means square error (RMSE) and the correlation coefficient () for independent meat samples using FT-NIR were 0.511% and 0.913, respectively. At the same time, for E-nose, these two indicators were 1.28% and 0.841, respectively. When the E-nose and FT-NIR data were fused, the RMSE decreased to 0.166%, and the improved to 0.972. All the results indicated that fusion of the low-cost E-nose and FT-NIR could be employed for rapid and convenient testing of beef adulterated with duck.
一种基于比色传感器与傅里叶变换近红外(FT-NIR)光谱融合的低成本电子鼻(E-nose)被提出,作为一种快速便捷的检测鸭肉掺假牛肉的技术。测量总挥发性碱性氮、蛋白质、脂肪、总糖和灰分,以研究生牛肉和鸭肉基本性质的差异;GC-MS 用于分析这两种肉类发出的挥发性有机化合物的差异。为了进行变量选择和光谱去噪,分别使用简单检验(<0.05)与一阶导数、二阶导数、中心化、标准正态变量变换和多元散射校正相结合进行处理,并比较结果。构建极限学习机模型以识别掺假牛肉并预测掺假水平。结果表明,对于识别生牛肉、牛肉-鸭肉混合物和生鸭肉的独立样本,FT-NIR 提供了 100%的识别率,优于本文创建的 E-nose(83.33%)。在预测掺假水平方面,使用 FT-NIR 的独立肉类样本的均方根误差(RMSE)和相关系数()分别为 0.511%和 0.913。同时,对于 E-nose,这两个指标分别为 1.28%和 0.841。当融合 E-nose 和 FT-NIR 数据时,RMSE 降低到 0.166%,而 提高到 0.972。所有结果表明,低成本 E-nose 和 FT-NIR 的融合可用于快速便捷地检测鸭肉掺假牛肉。