Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
Diabetes Care. 2022 Mar 1;45(3):520-528. doi: 10.2337/dc21-1285.
This study aimed to 1) identify the frequency of severe and level 2 hypoglycemia presenting in individuals with type 1 diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGMs), including those with concomitant closed-loop insulin pumps, in a clinical practice setting and 2) evaluate the impact of beliefs around hypoglycemia in the development of severe and level 2 hypoglycemia in this population.
A cross-sectional survey study in adults with type 1 diabetes using CGMs >6 months was conducted at a large tertiary academic center. Participant demographics, 6-month severe hypoglycemia history, hypoglycemia beliefs (with the Attitude to Awareness of Hypoglycemia questionnaire), and 4-week CGM glucose data were collected. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the presentation of severe and level 2 hypoglycemia and identify associated risk factors.
A total of 289 participants were recruited (including 257 participants with CGM data within the last 3 months). Of these, 25.6% experienced at least one severe hypoglycemic episode in the last 6 months, and 13.6% presented with ≥1% of time in level 2 hypoglycemia on CGMs. Reporting beliefs about prioritizing hyperglycemia avoidance was associated with severe hypoglycemia development (P < 0.001), while having beliefs of minimal concerns for hypoglycemia was associated with spending ≥1% of time in level 2 hypoglycemia (P = 0.038).
Despite the use of advanced diabetes technologies, severe and level 2 hypoglycemia continues to occur in individuals with type 1 diabetes and high hypoglycemia risks. Human factors, including beliefs around hypoglycemia, may continue to impact the effectiveness of glucose self-management.
本研究旨在:1)使用连续血糖监测系统(CGM),包括同时使用闭环胰岛素泵的患者,在临床实践环境中确定 1 型糖尿病患者出现严重和 2 级低血糖的频率;2)评估在该人群中,对低血糖的认知相关信念在严重和 2 级低血糖发展中的作用。
在一家大型三级学术中心,对使用 CGM 超过 6 个月的成年 1 型糖尿病患者进行了一项横断面调查研究。收集了参与者的人口统计学资料、6 个月内严重低血糖史、低血糖认知(采用低血糖认知态度问卷)以及 4 周 CGM 血糖数据。进行了统计学分析以评估严重和 2 级低血糖的发生情况并确定相关的危险因素。
共招募了 289 名参与者(包括 257 名在过去 3 个月内有 CGM 数据的参与者)。其中,25.6%的参与者在过去 6 个月内至少发生过一次严重低血糖事件,13.6%的参与者在 CGM 上出现了≥1%的 2 级低血糖时间。报告避免高血糖的认知优先性与严重低血糖的发生相关(P < 0.001),而对低血糖的最小担忧认知与出现≥1%的 2 级低血糖时间相关(P = 0.038)。
尽管使用了先进的糖尿病技术,但 1 型糖尿病患者和低血糖风险较高的患者仍会发生严重和 2 级低血糖。包括对低血糖的认知相关信念在内的人为因素可能继续影响血糖自我管理的效果。