Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Department of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway.
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 11;17(1):e0262458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262458. eCollection 2022.
Earlier research has revealed a strong relationship between alcohol use and sickness absence. The aim of this review was to explore and uncover this relationship by looking at differences in type of design (cross-sectional vs. longitudinal), type of data (self-reported vs. registered data), and type of sickness absence (long-term vs. short term).
Six databases were searched through June 2020. Observational and experimental studies from 1980 to 2020, in English or Scandinavian languages reporting the results of the association between alcohol consumption and sickness absence among working population were included. Quality assessment, and statistical analysis focusing on differences in the likelihood of sickness absence on subgroup levels were performed on each association, not on each study. Differences in the likelihood of sickness absence were analyzed by means of meta-analysis. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018112078.
Fifty-nine studies (58% longitudinal) including 439,209 employees (min. 43, max. 77,746) from 15 countries were included. Most associations indicating positive and statistically significant results were based on longitudinal data (70%) and confirmed the strong/causal relationship between alcohol use and sickness absence. The meta-analysis included eight studies (ten samples). The increased risk for sickness absence was likely to be found in cross-sectional studies (OR: 8.28, 95% CI: 6.33-10.81), studies using self-reported absence data (OR: 5.16, 95% CI: 3.16-8.45), and those reporting short-term sickness absence (OR: 4.84, 95% CI: 2.73-8.60).
This review supports, but also challenges earlier evidence on the association between alcohol use and sickness absence. Certain types of design, data, and types of sickness absence may produce large effects. Hence, to investigate the actual association between alcohol and sickness absence, research should produce and review longitudinal designed studies using registry data and do subgroup analyses that cover and explain variability of this association.
早期研究表明,饮酒与病假之间存在很强的关联。本综述的目的是通过考察设计类型(横断面研究与纵向研究)、数据类型(自我报告与登记数据)和病假类型(长期病假与短期病假)的差异,来探讨并揭示这种关联。
通过 2020 年 6 月前的 6 个数据库进行检索,纳入了 1980 年至 2020 年间发表的以英语或斯堪的纳维亚语撰写、报告工作人群饮酒与病假之间关联结果的观察性和实验性研究。对每项关联进行了质量评估和统计学分析,重点关注亚组水平病假发生可能性的差异,但并非对每项研究都进行分析。通过荟萃分析分析病假发生可能性的差异。PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42018112078。
纳入了 59 项研究(58%为纵向研究),共纳入了来自 15 个国家的 439,209 名员工(最小 43 人,最大 77,746 人)。大多数表明阳性且具有统计学意义的关联结果均基于纵向数据(70%),并证实了饮酒与病假之间存在强/因果关系。荟萃分析纳入了 8 项研究(10 个样本)。横断面研究(OR:8.28,95%CI:6.33-10.81)、使用自我报告缺勤数据的研究(OR:5.16,95%CI:3.16-8.45)和报告短期病假的研究(OR:4.84,95%CI:2.73-8.60)更有可能发现病假风险增加。
本综述支持但也挑战了先前关于饮酒与病假之间关联的证据。某些类型的设计、数据和病假类型可能会产生较大的影响。因此,为了研究饮酒与病假之间的实际关联,研究应采用登记数据进行纵向设计研究,并进行亚组分析,涵盖并解释这种关联的变异性。