Suppr超能文献

在职业健康服务中开展酒精预防工作:“知其然”比“知其所以然”更重要——WIRUS OHS 研究。

Working with alcohol prevention in occupational health services: "knowing how" is more important than "knowing that" - the WIRUS OHS study.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.

出版信息

Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2022 Oct 1;17(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13722-022-00335-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alcohol consumption is a major public health challenge; the majority of employees consume alcohol regularly and a considerable proportion of employees can be characterized as risky drinkers in need of interventions. Occupational health services (OHS) are uniquely positioned for implementing alcohol prevention interventions targeting employees, but rarely do so. Studies have shown that lack of knowledge among OHS personnel is a barrier to alcohol prevention activity. This study aimed to explore OHS personnels' levels of theoretical and practical alcohol knowledge, and whether these two ways of knowing were differentially associated with alcohol prevention activity.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, survey data were collected from 322 OHS personnel in Norway in 2018 (response rate = 53.6%). The survey included variables of two ways of knowing (theoretical and practical) and three types of doing (intervention frequency, conducting individual interventions, and conducting group interventions). Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, paired sample t-tests, bivariate correlations, and adjusted linear and logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

OHS personnel rated their theoretical alcohol knowledge higher than their practical knowledge (η = 0.33, p < 0.001). Higher reported levels of practical knowledge were associated with higher intervention frequency (b = 0.39, β = 0.60, p < 0.001) and greater likelihood of conducting individual interventions (OR = 1.60, p < .001) as well as group interventions (OR = 1.84, p < 0.001). Theoretical knowledge was not associated with conducting interventions, and there was no evidence of an interaction between the two ways of knowing in their association with doing. Sensitivity analyses did not indicate clustering effects of OHS personnel being employed within different units.

CONCLUSIONS

Different ways of knowing about alcohol among OHS personnel were dissimilarly associated with conducting alcohol prevention interventions in occupational health settings. For doing, knowing how seems to be more important than knowing that. Training programs for OHS personnel should emphasize knowledge about how to deal with alcohol-related issues and how to conduct prevention interventions, rather than focus on detrimental effects of alcohol.

摘要

背景

饮酒是一个主要的公共卫生挑战;大多数员工经常饮酒,相当一部分员工可以被认为是需要干预的风险饮酒者。职业健康服务(OHS)在针对员工实施酒精预防干预措施方面具有独特的优势,但很少这样做。研究表明,OHS 人员缺乏知识是酒精预防活动的障碍。本研究旨在探讨 OHS 人员的理论和实践酒精知识水平,以及这两种知识方式与酒精预防活动的相关性是否不同。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,2018 年从挪威的 322 名 OHS 人员中收集了调查数据(应答率=53.6%)。该调查包括两种知识方式(理论和实践)和三种行为方式(干预频率、进行个体干预和进行群体干预)的变量。使用描述性统计、配对样本 t 检验、双变量相关分析以及调整后的线性和逻辑回归分析来分析数据。

结果

OHS 人员对他们的理论酒精知识的评价高于他们的实践知识(η=0.33,p<0.001)。报告的实践知识水平较高与更高的干预频率(b=0.39,β=0.60,p<0.001)和更有可能进行个体干预(OR=1.60,p<.001)以及群体干预(OR=1.84,p<.001)相关。理论知识与干预的实施无关,而且这两种知识方式与行为的关联之间没有证据表明存在相互作用。敏感性分析并未表明 OHS 人员在不同单位就业存在聚类效应。

结论

OHS 人员对酒精的不同认识方式与在职业健康环境中实施酒精预防干预措施的相关性不同。对于行为,实践知识似乎比理论知识更重要。OHS 人员的培训计划应强调处理与酒精相关问题的知识以及如何进行预防干预,而不是专注于酒精的有害影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bf5/9526917/8a0dfc4638b1/13722_2022_335_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验