Suppr超能文献

封闭剂渗入牙本质小管:不同冲洗系统的评估:原创研究

The Sealer Penetration into the Dentinal Tubules: An Appraisal of Different Irrigation Systems: Original Research.

作者信息

Ch Thouseef, Shaik Izaz, Khan Mohammed Muzammil, Parvekar Prashik, Mirza Mubashir Baig, Mustafa Mohammed, Tiwari Heena

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodntics, Malabar Dental College and Research Center, Malappuram, Kerala, India.

Department of MDS, DMDc, Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, Newark, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov;13(Suppl 2):S1280-S1285. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_95_21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A good endodontic sealer aids in a successful root canal treatment. Sealer in turn depends on the thorough irrigation technique and debris removal. Hence, in the present study, we intend to compare the sealer's dispersion into dentinal tubules of the different irrigation systems by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM).

METHODOLOGY

Seventy-six single-rooted, freshly removed human mandibular premolars were taken. They were separated into equal groups as conventional endodontic needle irrigation system, Endovacirrigation, Endoactivator irrigation, and manual dynamic agitation groups. Protaper rotary system was used and obturation was done with gutta-percha. The sealer used was AH Plus labeled with fluorescent dye (0.1% Rhodamine B isothcyanate). Transverse sections from the root apex at the levels of 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm were scanned using CLSM. The sealer's penetration for the depth and the percentage were measured.

RESULTS

We observed that endovac irrigation system showed maximum percentage and depth of sealer's penetration compared to endoactivator, manual dynamic agitation, and conventional methods at 1, 3, and 5 mm levels from the apex.

CONCLUSION

The irrigation systems significantly influence the penetration of the Sealer into root dentinal tubules. When penetration of sealer at different levels, compared to endoactivator, manual dynamic agitation, and conventional method, significant greater levels were attained with the EndoVac system.

摘要

引言

一种良好的根管封闭剂有助于根管治疗的成功。而封闭剂又取决于彻底的冲洗技术和碎屑清除。因此,在本研究中,我们打算通过共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)比较不同冲洗系统的封闭剂在牙本质小管中的扩散情况。

方法

选取76颗新鲜拔除的单根人下颌前磨牙。将它们分为常规根管治疗针冲洗系统组、EndoVac冲洗组、Endoactivator冲洗组和手动动态搅拌组。使用Protaper旋转系统并用牙胶进行充填。所用的封闭剂是用荧光染料(0.1%异硫氰酸罗丹明B)标记的AH Plus。使用CLSM扫描根尖1mm、3mm和5mm水平处的根横切面。测量封闭剂的渗透深度和百分比。

结果

我们观察到,与Endoactivator、手动动态搅拌和传统方法相比,EndoVac冲洗系统在距根尖1mm、3mm和5mm水平处显示出封闭剂渗透的最大百分比和深度。

结论

冲洗系统对封闭剂渗透到牙根牙本质小管有显著影响。与Endoactivator、手动动态搅拌和传统方法相比,当比较不同水平的封闭剂渗透时,EndoVac系统能达到显著更高的水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fd6/8686904/f052ab3cc747/JPBS-13-1280-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验