Suppr超能文献

三种不同血管性痴呆大鼠模型的认知功能与心脏功能比较

Comparison of Cognitive Performance and Cardiac Function Between Three Different Rat Models of Vascular Dementia.

作者信息

Wei Baoyu, Wu Shihao, Wang Zhaoqi, Song Wanshan, Zhu Jinqiang

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Component-Based Chinese Medicine, Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 301617, People's Republic of China.

Department of Acupuncture and Cerebropathy, Second Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 300250, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2022 Jan 4;18:19-28. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S338226. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Establishing an ideal animal model is essential for studying the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of vascular dementia (VD). The present study was designed to compare the differences of behavior, cerebral blood flow (CBF), cardiac output and the levels of myocardial enzyme of three different VD rat models.

METHODS

The rats were randomly divided into sham-operated group (SHAM), permanent bilateral common carotid artery occlusion group (BCCAO), BCCAO combined with sodium nitroprusside (2.0mg·kg) group (BCCAO+2.0SNP) and BCCAO combined with sodium nitroprusside (2.5mg·kg) group (BCCAO+2.5SNP). After operation, Morris water maze test, echocardiographic evaluation and the measurement of CBF were performed, then the levels of myocardial enzymes in serum were assessed during euthanasia.

RESULTS

Compared with SHAM rats, the three VD model rats showed different degrees of cognitive impairment, lower cardiac output and CBF, and BCCAO rats showed higher levels of myocardial enzymes. Compared with BCCAO rats, the spatial learning ability of BCCAO+2.0SNP rats and BCCAO+2.5SNP rats was more severely impaired, while the levels of myocardial enzymes of BCCAO+2.0SNP rats were lower. Compared with BCCAO+2.0SNP rats, BCCAO+2.5SNP rats showed no significant difference in cognitive function and cardiac function.

CONCLUSION

Our present study demonstrated that all of the three different VD rat models exhibited cognitive and cardiac function impairment. The BCCAO+2.0SNP model and BCCAO+2.5SNP model damaged the spatial learning ability more seriously. The BCCAO+2.5SNP model caused more comprehensive cognitive impairment. In addition, the BCCAO+2.0SNP model and BCCAO+2.5SNP model might cause more serious damage to cardiac function.

摘要

目的

建立理想的动物模型对于研究血管性痴呆(VD)的发病机制、预防和治疗至关重要。本研究旨在比较三种不同VD大鼠模型在行为、脑血流量(CBF)、心输出量和心肌酶水平方面的差异。

方法

将大鼠随机分为假手术组(SHAM)、永久性双侧颈总动脉闭塞组(BCCAO)、BCCAO联合硝普钠(2.0mg·kg)组(BCCAO+2.0SNP)和BCCAO联合硝普钠(2.5mg·kg)组(BCCAO+2.5SNP)。术后进行Morris水迷宫试验、超声心动图评估和CBF测量,然后在安乐死期间评估血清中心肌酶的水平。

结果

与SHAM大鼠相比,三种VD模型大鼠均表现出不同程度的认知障碍、较低的心输出量和CBF,且BCCAO大鼠的心肌酶水平较高。与BCCAO大鼠相比,BCCAO+2.0SNP大鼠和BCCAO+2.5SNP大鼠的空间学习能力受损更严重,而BCCAO+2.0SNP大鼠的心肌酶水平较低。与BCCAO+2.0SNP大鼠相比,BCCAO+2.5SNP大鼠在认知功能和心脏功能方面无显著差异。

结论

我们目前的研究表明,三种不同的VD大鼠模型均表现出认知和心脏功能损害。BCCAO+2.0SNP模型和BCCAO+2.5SNP模型对空间学习能力的损害更严重。BCCAO+2.5SNP模型导致更全面的认知障碍。此外,BCCAO+2.0SNP模型和BCCAO+2.5SNP模型可能对心脏功能造成更严重的损害。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fa5/8742620/215c86575b81/NDT-18-19-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验