Division of General Internal Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Oct;37(13):3251-3257. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07330-2. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
While advanced care planning (ACP) is recommended in dementia and cancer care, there are unique challenges in ACP for individuals with dementia, such as the insidious onset and progression of cognitive impairment, potentially leading to high-intensity care at the end of life (EOL) for this population.
To compare ACP completion and receipt of high-intensity care at the EOL between decedents with dementia versus cancer.
Retrospective longitudinal cohort study.
Participants of the U.S. Health and Retirement Study who died between 2000 and 2014 with dementia (n = 2099) and cancer (n = 1137).
Completion of three types of ACP (living will, durable power of attorney for healthcare [DPOAH], discussions of preferences for EOL care) and three measures of EOL care intensity (in-hospital death, intensive care unit [ICU] care in the last 2 years of life, life support use in the last 2 years of life).
Use of living will was lower in dementia than in cancer (adjusted proportion, 49.9% vs. 56.9%; difference, - 7.0 percentage points [pp, 95% CI, - 13.3 to - 0.7]; p = 0.03). Use of DPOAH was similar between the two groups, but a lower proportion of decedents with dementia had discussed preferences compared to decedents with cancer (53.0% vs. 68.1%; - 15.1 pp [95% CI, - 19.3 to - 10.9]; p < 0.001). In-hospital death was higher in dementia than in cancer (29.5% vs. 19.8%; + 9.7 pp [95% CI, + 5.9 to + 13.5]; p < 0.001), although use of ICU care was lower (20.9% vs. 26.1%; - 5.2 pp [95% CI, - 9.8 to - 0.7]; p = 0.03). Use of life support was similar between the two groups.
Individuals with dementia complete ACP less frequently and might be receiving higher-intensity EOL care than those with cancer. Interventions targeting individuals with dementia may be necessary to further improve EOL care for this population.
尽管在痴呆症和癌症护理中推荐进行高级医疗保健计划(ACP),但痴呆症患者的 ACP 存在独特的挑战,例如认知障碍的隐匿性发作和进展,这可能导致该人群在生命末期(EOL)接受高强度的护理。
比较痴呆症和癌症患者的 ACP 完成情况和 EOL 高强度护理的接受情况。
回顾性纵向队列研究。
参加美国健康与退休研究并在 2000 年至 2014 年期间死亡的患有痴呆症(n = 2099)和癌症(n = 1137)的参与者。
三种类型的 ACP(生前遗嘱、医疗保健持久授权书[DPOAH]、讨论 EOL 护理偏好)和三种 EOL 护理强度的措施(医院内死亡、生命最后 2 年 ICU 护理、生命最后 2 年使用生命支持)的完成情况。
使用生前遗嘱的比例在痴呆症患者中低于癌症患者(调整后的比例,49.9% vs. 56.9%;差异,-7.0 个百分点[95%CI,-13.3 至-0.7];p = 0.03)。两组之间使用 DPOAH 的比例相似,但痴呆症患者中讨论偏好的比例低于癌症患者(53.0% vs. 68.1%;-15.1 个百分点[95%CI,-19.3 至-10.9];p < 0.001)。医院内死亡在痴呆症患者中高于癌症患者(29.5% vs. 19.8%;+9.7 个百分点[95%CI,+5.9 至+13.5];p < 0.001),尽管 ICU 护理的使用较低(20.9% vs. 26.1%;-5.2 个百分点[95%CI,-9.8 至-0.7];p = 0.03)。两组之间的生命支持使用情况相似。
痴呆症患者完成 ACP 的频率较低,并且可能比癌症患者接受更高强度的 EOL 护理。针对痴呆症患者的干预措施可能是进一步改善该人群 EOL 护理的必要措施。