Faculty of Education, PEDAL Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Child Dev. 2022 Jul;93(4):1162-1180. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13730. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
This systematic review and meta-analysis considered evidence of guided play compared to direct instruction or free play to support children's learning and development. Interventions from 39 studies were reviewed (published 1977-2020); 17 were included in meta-analysis (N = 3893; M = 1-8 years; M 49.8%; M White 41%, African American/Black 28%, Hispanic 19%). Guided play had a greater positive effect than direct instruction on early maths skills (g = 0.24), shape knowledge (g = 0.63), and task switching (g = 0.40); and than free play on spatial vocabulary (g = 0.93). Differences were not identified for other key outcomes. Narrative synthesis highlighted heterogeneity in the conceptualization and implementation of guided play across studies.
本系统评价和荟萃分析考虑了与直接指导或自由游戏相比,引导式游戏对支持儿童学习和发展的证据。对 39 项研究的干预措施进行了综述(发表于 1977 年至 2020 年);17 项研究纳入荟萃分析(N = 3893;M = 1-8 岁;M = 49.8%;M 白人 41%,非裔美国人/黑 28%,西班牙裔 19%)。与直接指导相比,引导式游戏对早期数学技能(g = 0.24)、形状知识(g = 0.63)和任务转换(g = 0.40)的影响更大;与自由游戏相比,对空间词汇的影响更大(g = 0.93)。其他关键结果没有差异。叙述性综合强调了引导式游戏在研究中概念化和实施方面的异质性。